Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Close Up Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
Kate Middleton/ Invasion of privacy?
Page 1 of 17 next> last>>
Sep 18, 2012 20:53:28   #
handgunner Loc: Windsor Locks, Connecticut
 
Where do we draw the line?????

Reply
Sep 18, 2012 20:55:27   #
micro Loc: Texas
 
handgunner wrote:
Where do we draw the line?????


I draw the line at "do unto others as..............."

Reply
Sep 18, 2012 21:01:46   #
handgunner Loc: Windsor Locks, Connecticut
 
Where do you draw the line between photography and invasion of privacy? (be nice) :)

Reply
Check out Black and White Photography section of our forum.
Sep 18, 2012 21:02:20   #
elise3
 
Ditto Micro, Just because you have the equipment/technology to stalk someone does not justify doing it. Plus, I heard that the photographer was a female. Shame on her! I hope they prosecute.

Reply
Sep 18, 2012 21:13:32   #
Elfstop
 
For those of us that don't get paid for publicity pics its easy...the line is very wide. It only gets thinner when your electric bill is due...I have a friend that photographs very famous people for a living...he says he now has no conscience. I feel bad for him.

Reply
Sep 18, 2012 21:17:44   #
SpeedyWilson Loc: Upstate South Carolina
 
The line might be defined by the size of your wallet. I understand that camera systems to capture good images at 1/2 mile range can cost $20,000 and more. A demonstration of the equipment needed was on the TODAY Show this morning, and is online at today.com, topic "Ex-paparazzo shows how long lens captured Kate pics."

http://today.msnbc.msn.com/

Reply
Sep 18, 2012 21:22:28   #
photo guy Loc: Chippewa Falls, WI
 
I would say what that photographer did in the case with Kate was wrong. She has an expectation of privacy especially since she was on vacation and was at a private location.

Reply
Check out Landscape Photography section of our forum.
Sep 18, 2012 21:29:04   #
Elfstop
 
Good article

Reply
Sep 18, 2012 21:34:53   #
tk Loc: Iowa
 
Wrong. Needs to be stopped. But how? You can arrest and fine but there will be underground shots despite this.

Reply
Sep 18, 2012 22:20:56   #
krgatlgm Loc: Las Vegas, Nv
 
micro wrote:
handgunner wrote:
Where do we draw the line?????


I draw the line at "do unto others as..............."


I cannot think of a better answer!!!

Reply
Sep 18, 2012 22:23:13   #
Wabbit Loc: Arizona Desert
 
handgunner wrote:
Where do we draw the line?????


Hey Doc ..... I'd like to see the pictures before I answer .....

Reply
 
 
Sep 18, 2012 22:29:38   #
Wabbit Loc: Arizona Desert
 
handgunner wrote:
Where do you draw the line between photography and invasion of privacy? (be nice) :)


Hey Doc ..... It's all about the money ..... how did the photographer know they were there ..... I smell a rat

Reply
Sep 18, 2012 22:57:37   #
handgunner Loc: Windsor Locks, Connecticut
 
Wabbit wrote:
handgunner wrote:
Where do you draw the line between photography and invasion of privacy? (be nice) :)


Hey Doc ..... It's all about the money ..... how did the photographer know they were there ..... I smell a rat


Wabbit.... I smell a wat too!!!

:thumbdown:

Reply
Sep 18, 2012 23:20:30   #
Dback4430 Loc: Lockport Il
 
Simple , If you dont wants your " bits " photographed , then keep them clothed . Technology comes at a price . The photographer makes a living doing this . It just happened. So what , In Europe at the beach everyone is topless . who cares ?

Reply
Sep 19, 2012 05:13:14   #
william48 Loc: New Philadelphia,Ohio
 
If she would have acted like a lady and left her clothes on this would not be a story

Reply
Page 1 of 17 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Bridge Camera Show Case section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.