Timmers Loc: San Antonio Texas.

Link to day 128. The continuing set.

(Download)


(Download)


(Download)

19photo30 Loc: Olympia, WA

Enough pornography already! Really getting tired of this!

papakatz45 Loc: South Florida-West Palm Beach

Bring on the donkey!

19photo30 Loc: Olympia, WA

Brilliant reply! Awesome! Still, enough of the lesbian crap. I sure hope you can do better.

Timmers Loc: San Antonio Texas.

No, you are the 'awesome' one displaying your under educate understanding of world history. During the late period of the Roman Empire in the Circus Maximus city prostitutes demonstrated there abilities to gang rape a donkey to death as part of the in between spectacle. Good advertising of their 'skills'. My source is a scholar Dr. Robert Fabian who taught Latin.

Another interesting source for the intellectually under developed would be Lawrence Durrell, his powerful book TUNC. In the introduction he sights Dostoevsky by lifting that line from his book Notes From Underground "Man is not a piano key'.

So that you don't need to look up Tunc, it is derived from Latin and reflects the principle of "Pax Romana" which was Roman Rule by the Sword. So with Tunc we have a principle of rule, rearrange the letters in Tunc and you get the opposing notion of the Greek concept of Cunt, or Cunnilingus. This is a form of government that has the opposite approach from that of Tunc/Pax Romana.

If you push this further, you can see the notion of Tunc in the American System of power. Look at the meeting location for the US Government House of Representatives/Senate and you can see how the US Flag is draped, and that it rests between to Fascia with axe heads facing inward. We, the US, are a fascist state by this outward use of symbols.

By the way, it is out of ignorance that you two speak of the 'lesbian' card. Here is a minor test for you, do you know the meaning of 'Stonewall' and how it relates to the gay community? Ok, why do a bother, you two are what gays call breeders. Back to sleep boys!

Bittmoore Loc: SE Wisconsin

Didn't realize you were being forced to participate in this forum or particular thread.

papakatz45 Loc: South Florida-West Palm Beach

We are all entitled to our opinions regarding postings on the forum, whether or not you agree, are we not?

papakatz45 Loc: South Florida-West Palm Beach

You are the only one who brought up the 'lesbian' card.

Timmers Loc: San Antonio Texas.

19photo30
"Brilliant reply! Awesome! Still, enough of the lesbian crap. I sure hope you can do better."

Look above about three posts.

19photo30 Loc: Olympia, WA

Sorry that the administrators of UHH would allow this pornography to continue. Certainly contributes nothing to the enjoyment of photography. Maybe I'm just not sick enough. Wonder what he would do to that donkey of his? Hmmm..........?

JohnFrim Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.

Tim, this is another of your treatises that doesn’t connect with me, nor with many others. Where you see a history lesson on Pax Romana or Tunc (BTW, I am surprised that you used — and got away with — that anagram), I see a couple of photos that look like frame extracts from a porn flick. How long is the video and what frame rate did you use? (I want to calculate roughly when I can expect to see something new from you.)

Timmers Loc: San Antonio Texas.

Who knows, perhaps this will help? Who am I kidding!
Jordan Peterson on Dostoevsky's Notes From Underground:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97jBvbmY03g

Bittmoore Loc: SE Wisconsin

We are certainly ENTITLED to our opinions. Whether it makes sense to view a "nudes" or boudoir photo posting forum and complain of "pornography" rather than skip posts by those you feel are pornographic is another matter.
The comment did nothing to help the OP with any perceived technical issue(s) of the images posted. Nor did it express what it was that made the viewer believe that the images deserved to be labeled as pornographic.
If you do not wish to see women, or men for that matter, in various stages of undress why peruse this forum? It's clearly labeled and easy to avoid.
If you do not like the subject(s) or poses chosen by a particular photographer why view their posts?
Just because you don't like something doesn't make it pornographic.

JohnFrim Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.

You seem to have arrived late to the party. This is Day 129, and there are usually multiple images on each day’s post, along with “plenty” of discussion. You might want to do some background research on Tim.

JeffDavidson Loc: Originally Detroit Now Los Angeles

Doesn't sound like much of a photography forum to me but about bashing. If I don't like it, I don't keep looking. Bashing one another contributes nothing to this forum.