Delderby wrote:
It seems that manufacturers are now leaving anti aliasing filters off many new cameras. Apparently, with new sensors, moire is less likely to be a problem in future. Until recently it has been easier (much easier) to sharpen (in PP or in camera) that tiny little bit extra to overcome the difference between with anti-alias or without, whereas moire, which is the reason for including an anti-alias filter, is very difficult, if at all, to get rid of. However, as the pixel race resumes, and sensors become more crowded, I believe moire will continue (or return) as a problem.
Have Hogs any thoughts on this, based on practical experience, or just logical thought, perhaps on the problems of moire and the advantages ar otherwise of anti-alias (low pass) filters?
It seems that manufacturers are now leaving anti a... (
show quote)
Camera manufactures are trying to deliver the best possible image they can out of there products. They do extensive testing on different models to come up with the best combination.
For example, the D5 (Nikon's current best, does have a low pass filter) the D850 and D500 do not.
One of the most important things that makes a difference in image quality is, THE PHOTOGRAPHER'S KNOWLEDGE.