mwsilvers wrote:
If you are referring to me, I never said Affinity was inadequate. It is in fact a very fine program at an extremely reasonable price. But, one should also not bury their heads in the sand. If it is important enough for someone to take the effort to shoot raw files, and they are using the Develop persona to process them, they should be aware of Develop's limitations compared to the competition.
No, I was not referring specifically to you but trying to make a general comparison between a forum dedicated to Affinity Photo (AP) and this one that has users of many different editing programs participating. The OP was asking for help and advice on certain functions of AP and I feel there would be more information that would help answer those questions by posting a query on the AP Forum.
However, since you brought it up, you may not have used the word "inadequate" but by saying:
"For most people who are either new to raw or who do not have high expectations of a raw editor's functionality, Affinity's Develop persona may be all the raw functionality they will ever need. For those of us who believe that getting the most from our raw images is important, the Develop persona falls far short of the features available in Lightroom/ACR, Capture One Pro, and DXO PhotoLab Elite.",
you are not even rising to the level of the saying "damning with faint praise." What you implied in this paragraph is that AP users are of lesser ability and knowledge than those using other programs such as the three you named, and do not care about "getting the most from our raw images."
I can plead guilty to that scenario personally as, although I do use many of AP's numerous tools there are probably as many I haven't used, at least not yet, and I'm still trying to learn photo editing in general and the use of AP. And I do use AP for processing nothing than RAW files and simply have not found the issues your raise to be a problem thus far. There must be many AP users who do not fit your description of AP users as either "new to RAW" processing or having "low expectations" of a Raw editor's functionality, and are burying their "head in the sand," since AP Has become quite popular with a now fairly large user base. Saying all of us aren't interested in getting the most from our RAW images is a put down on those of us who do have that interest and think we find it in AP.
There have been a couple of other recent threads here on this exact issue and they all have focused on supposed inadequacies of the Develop Persona. It seems to me that APs overall design has some differences from other editing programs in that it has a designated workspace, the Develop Persona, whose main function is to prepare RAW files for editing in other areas (other Personas) of AP, and that the tools in those other Personas are extensive. You state AP "falls far short of the features available in Lightroom...." In my experience, and considering overall features and performance, that's absurd. The last I knew LR has neither focus merging or layers - composites available whereas AP has both. Focus merging is a tool I use almost every time I process landscape image files and I also have a need to do composites at times.
Apparently we shall have to agree to disagree. I know you can't persuade me that AP falls "far short" of other editing programs, and least not regarding overall performance and results, and I'm sure I can't change your strongly held convictions on this issue. But I am curious - have you arrived at these perceptions through experience using AP or from reading others opinions and beliefs about AP? I don't mean this question to be disparaging, just curious on where your knowledge base on AP derives from. Btw, I have personally used LR in the past.