If I take a shot with my phone camera and process it on the phone with the Lightroom app, is it SOOC ? (Straight Out Of Camera). What if I use one of the Scene modes on my regular camera and the camera does the processing? My Sony has an app that allows me to set up three areas with different exposures and color temperatures in the same shot and blends them in-camera. Is that SOOC? Is it really any different to letting the camera process an Auto jpeg? What about in-camera lens correction or HDR?
Is letting some engineer in Japan determine how my image is supposed to look any more purist than me deciding how I want it to look?
If the image has been edited at all after it has come out of the camera it is not SOOC.
Amost all my images have been edited after it comes out of the camera.
With all the in-camera presets, not much, not like it used to be with film.
Indi
Loc: L. I., NY, Palm Beach Cty when it's cold.
THAT...was well put Linda. Bravo.
Déja vu. (Seen already, as in a dream)
JPEG is far better than full frame, and you should always use a lens hood rather than a tripod.
Mike
repleo wrote:
If I take a shot with my phone camera and process it on the phone with the Lightroom app, is it SOOC ? (Straight Out Of Camera). What if I use one of the Scene modes on my regular camera and the camera does the processing? My Sony has an app that allows me to set up three areas with different exposures and color temperatures in the same shot and blends them in-camera. Is that SOOC? Is it really any different to letting the camera process an Auto jpeg? What about in-camera lens correction or HDR?
Is letting some engineer in Japan determine how my image is supposed to look any more purist than me deciding how I want it to look?
If I take a shot with my phone camera and process ... (
show quote)
There is relevance to "SOOC v PP". Many (and not only photographers) regard a PP'd photo as something of a con, and SOOC as true. In-camera settings are to do with exposure and image quality. There is a general wariness of PP'd photos, where it is possible to change a photo into something beyond all recognition. This is a pity, because mostly PP, as in SOOC, is also about exposure and image quality,
The art of debate is to present an argument, often tongue in cheek, whether you agree with it or not.
Delderby wrote:
There is relevance to "SOOC v PP". Many (and not only photographers) regard a PP'd photo as something of a con, and SOOC as true. In-camera settings are to do with exposure and image quality. There is a general wariness of PP'd photos, where it is possible to change a photo into something beyond all recognition. This is a pity, because mostly PP, as in SOOC, is also about exposure and image quality,
You must have a very old camera or phone. The latest cameras and phones include so much more processing power in them than just exposure and image quality. My "old" Galaxy S8 smart phone can do all sorts of things that were reserved to Photoshop just 5 or 6 years ago.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.