Check out Wedding Photography section of our forum.
Trump breaks Nixon's record....
Oct 17, 2019 14:32:24 #
Oct 17, 2019 15:51:42 #
He's now over 51% and it's putting Republicans holding office on notice.
Some have already started speaking out against Trump and the tide is rising.
Soon only the Trumpeteers and the right-wing trolls on this site will still be in his corner.
Watching him self-destruct in real-time is a beautiful sight.
Some have already started speaking out against Trump and the tide is rising.
Soon only the Trumpeteers and the right-wing trolls on this site will still be in his corner.
Watching him self-destruct in real-time is a beautiful sight.
Oct 17, 2019 15:58:28 #
McKinneyMike wrote:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/polls-show-americans-have-come-to-support-trumps-impeachment-much-faster-than-nixons-or-clintons-155418911.html
Lol duh, To be expected when you get the fake news media spewing and publishing bullshit lies about Trump and also today’s a little different because we have the Internet and access to the news and fake news like we didn’t during Nixon’s time.
Check out Traditional Street and Architectural Photography section of our forum.
Oct 17, 2019 15:59:31 #
Frank T wrote:
He's now over 51% and it's putting Republicans holding office on notice.
Some have already started speaking out against Trump and the tide is rising.
Soon only the Trumpeteers and the right-wing trolls on this site will still be in his corner.
Watching him self-destruct in real-time is a beautiful sight.
Some have already started speaking out against Trump and the tide is rising.
Soon only the Trumpeteers and the right-wing trolls on this site will still be in his corner.
Watching him self-destruct in real-time is a beautiful sight.
Lol fake news just as was the polls that indicated Hillary was going to win the election in an electoral landslide. lolol
Oct 17, 2019 16:10:37 #
EyeSawYou wrote:
Lol fake news just as was the polls that indicated Hillary was going to win the election in an electoral landslide. lolol
Actually, the polls were accurate. They referred to the popular vote, which she won by more than 3,000,000 people. It was the Electoral College that she lost and unfortunately, that's the way our elections work.
But you keep believing what Fox tells you and stay safe in mom's basement.
Oct 17, 2019 17:50:20 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
Frank T wrote:
Actually, the polls were accurate. They referred to the popular vote, which she won by more than 3,000,000 people. It was the Electoral College that she lost and unfortunately, that's the way our elections work.
But you keep believing what Fox tells you and stay safe in mom's basement.
But you keep believing what Fox tells you and stay safe in mom's basement.
I dunno, He only seems to believe FOX when they say what he already believes or wants to believe.
Oct 17, 2019 21:30:53 #
Frank T wrote:
Actually, the polls were accurate. They referred to the popular vote, which she won by more than 3,000,000 people. It was the Electoral College that she lost and unfortunately, that's the way our elections work.
But you keep believing what Fox tells you and stay safe in mom's basement.
But you keep believing what Fox tells you and stay safe in mom's basement.
Why are you omitting the fact that almost ALL polls indicated that Hillary would win the 2016 election in an electoral landslide, she wasn't even close and neither were the pollsters. That wasn't Fox I was referring to, it was actually FiveThirtyEight. Oh ya, Hillary didn't win the popular vote that's a lie, just just got the popular vote, there's no winning anything.
Check out Photo Critique Section section of our forum.
Oct 17, 2019 21:32:40 #
thom w wrote:
I dunno, He only seems to believe FOX when they say what he already believes or wants to believe.
LOL had nothing to do with Fox, although Fox basically said Hillary had a much better chance of winning as well. So what was not true about what I said? Did Hillary not lose the electoral election?
Oct 17, 2019 22:16:50 #
EyeSawYou wrote:
So what was not true about what I said? Did Hillary not lose the electoral election?
I believe you said Hillary did not win the popular vote, but she did. Is that not a lie? Maybe LWW can make the call.
Oct 18, 2019 09:41:29 #
Elaine2025
Loc: Seattle, Wa
Frank T wrote:
Actually, the polls were accurate. They referred to the popular vote, which she won by more than 3,000,000 people. It was the Electoral College that she lost and unfortunately, that's the way our elections work.
But you keep believing what Fox tells you and stay safe in mom's basement.
But you keep believing what Fox tells you and stay safe in mom's basement.
OMG.....GROW UP......NO POLL REFERS TO THE POPULAR VOTE EINSTEIN. WE ELECT THROUGH THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE. YOU DEMS WILL LIE ABOUT ANYTHING. ABSOLUTELY ANYTHING.
Oct 18, 2019 09:45:40 #
Elaine2025 wrote:
OMG.....GROW UP......NO POLL REFERS TO THE POPULAR VOTE EINSTEIN. WE ELECT THROUGH THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE. YOU DEMS WILL LIE ABOUT ANYTHING. ABSOLUTELY ANYTHING.
Shutup for a change, TROLL.
Check out People Photography section of our forum.
Oct 18, 2019 15:33:53 #
Elaine2025 wrote:
OMG.....GROW UP......NO POLL REFERS TO THE POPULAR VOTE EINSTEIN. WE ELECT THROUGH THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE. YOU DEMS WILL LIE ABOUT ANYTHING. ABSOLUTELY ANYTHING.
Actually, Elaine, the poll -- every poll -- relates best to the sample of the population that was polled. If the sample was drawn randomly from the population at large then it should represent the popular vote. If you poll only members of the electoral college then you should have a representation of the electoral college vote. Simple, eh?
Oct 18, 2019 16:09:27 #
Elaine2025
Loc: Seattle, Wa
JohnFrim wrote:
Actually, Elaine, the poll -- every poll -- relates best to the sample of the population that was polled. If the sample was drawn randomly from the population at large then it should represent the popular vote. If you poll only members of the electoral college then you should have a representation of the electoral college vote. Simple, eh?
John, my point is the people taking the polls manipulate the outcome by who they poll. Just like they polls declared hildabeast the Presidential winner....but that didn't work out. After that, no one believes polls.
Oct 18, 2019 18:26:00 #
Elaine2025 wrote:
John, my point is the people taking the polls manipulate the outcome by who they poll. Just like they polls declared hildabeast the Presidential winner....but that didn't work out. After that, no one believes polls.
I will hold you to that, Elaine. DON'T EVER cite a poll that shows Trump or the repubs in the lead or you will be HYPOCRITE QUEEN. Deal?
Oct 18, 2019 18:29:12 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
EyeSawYou wrote:
LOL had nothing to do with Fox, although Fox basically said Hillary had a much better chance of winning as well. So what was not true about what I said? Did Hillary not lose the electoral election?
What does my saying you only believe FOX when they say what you already believe have to do with Hillary losing? You aren't channeling Dennis are you?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.