Heavy lens issue
Oct 17, 2019 12:16:23 #
nadelewitz wrote:
You appear, in this and other posts, to have a serious hatred of crop-sensor cameras. Deal with it.
The true secret to getting ahead in photography is to worry about the dramatic range and pixel resolution.
Oct 17, 2019 12:44:00 #
nadelewitz
Loc: Ithaca NY
CHG_CANON wrote:
The true secret to getting ahead in photography is to worry about the dramatic range and pixel resolution.
The "true secret" is to take pictures, and not get bogged down in technical minutiae that, to you, throws out a large portion of what the world uses quite happily and effectively.
And what does "getting ahead in photography" mean, that you are the appointed judge of?
Oct 17, 2019 12:45:40 #
CHG_CANON wrote:
The true secret to getting ahead in photography is to worry about the dramatic range and pixel resolution.
The true secret to getting ahead in photography is to worry about the dynamic range and pixel resolution.
There I fixed for you. Spell check is my worst enema. LOL
Oct 17, 2019 12:54:38 #
Davethehiker wrote:
The true secret to getting ahead in photography is to worry about the dynamic range and pixel resolution.
There I fixed for you. Spell check is my worst enema. LOL
There I fixed for you. Spell check is my worst enema. LOL
Thank you, I did a quick find all / change all for other thoughts:
The surest way to corrupt a novice is to explain the importance of dynamic range.
Oct 17, 2019 12:55:10 #
nadelewitz
Loc: Ithaca NY
Davethehiker wrote:
The true secret to getting ahead in photography is to worry about the dynamic range and pixel resolution.
There I fixed for you. Spell check is my worst enema. LOL
There I fixed for you. Spell check is my worst enema. LOL
I had trouble spelling "minutiae". Spell check taught me something once again, even though proper spelling has always been my big cause.
Oct 17, 2019 13:23:22 #
wdross
Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado
machia wrote:
What weight ? Lol
Come on, unless you have medical issues it’s not a factor.
But then again if you have lots of stuff I understand that you would try to minimize weight.
Perhaps photographers should work out with weights three times a week ?
Just kidding.😃
Come on, unless you have medical issues it’s not a factor.
But then again if you have lots of stuff I understand that you would try to minimize weight.
Perhaps photographers should work out with weights three times a week ?
Just kidding.😃
I disagree with it has to be a medical issue or factor. Weight usually is also associated with size. Why should I give my overhead carry-on to a camera? Especially when I can put my camera, two lenses (14 to 200 total equivalent), flash, filters, extra battery, and accessories all in a personal carry-on size (not overhead carry-on size) that fits under the seat in front of me and still leaves room for my feet. And next year I will be able to shoot with the equivalent of 300-2000 handheld with with one lens (estimated 16" X 4.5" diameter and 4 or 5 pounds) and a 2X teleconverter. How much weight and size does it take for Nikon or Canon to get out to 2000 in a zoom? And will it be handholdable? Sorry, sometimes size and weight gain one very little.
Oct 17, 2019 13:34:23 #
wdross wrote:
I disagree with it has to be a medical issue or factor. And next year I will be able to shoot with the equivalent of 300-2000 handheld with with one lens (estimated 16" X 4.5" diameter and 4 or 5 pounds) and a 2X teleconverter. How much weight and size does it take for Nikon or Canon to get out to 2000 in a zoom? And will it be handholdable? Sorry, sometimes size and weight gain one very little.
You are forgetting the "macho man" signalling that is so important so some males. To them, their gigantic hands that are too big for a small camera or a camera and lens too light weight for "stability", are synonyms for their testosterone levels!
Oct 17, 2019 13:45:37 #
I must admit I am a hypocrite... I justify having a lighter camera/lens due to my age and physical limitations; however, I continue to gain weight around my waist when it would be better for me to loose weight.
Oct 17, 2019 14:04:01 #
Oct 17, 2019 14:20:19 #
LWW
Loc: Banana Republic of America
Not yet mentioned, but if you carry a 80-200 2.8 or 300 4.0 or larger around the neck a proper strap makes or breaks the experience.
A solid monopod adds weight but aids immensely in traversing open ground with a load and can still work as a G1 VR system.
A solid monopod adds weight but aids immensely in traversing open ground with a load and can still work as a G1 VR system.
Oct 17, 2019 15:11:42 #
aellman wrote:
One reason the Nikon F was a favorite of professional photographers in the 1970s was it's weight. Many of them felt it's mass helped stabilize the camera in marginal shooting situations. >Alan
Thats ironic. I still have my Nikon F,and it's weighs less that my OMD EM5Dii.
Oct 17, 2019 15:13:36 #
Retina
Loc: Near Charleston,SC
Davethehiker wrote:
I reduce camera shake on my birding lens by pushing it over to the piano and attaching it with bungie cords.
I wonder if the Big Book on the piano gives you an extra half stop.
Oct 17, 2019 15:17:50 #
Retina
Loc: Near Charleston,SC
CatMarley wrote:
Do you mean "Cameras don't take pictures; people do"?I find the "best" camera is the one you end up grabbing the most often. It is a tool. And it doesn't matter how wonderful the tool is if it mostly stays at home while you are out using another. Your "best" camera and "greatest" lens don't take any pictures on the shelf.
Oct 17, 2019 15:26:55 #
I started out with heavy gear. the first major camera came along back in 2006 where I was able to utilize my current set of lenses with the D50.. but after my injury, I'm unable to carry these types of cameras let alone the extra gear, which at that time was several zoom lenses and a couple of fixed lenses. The max size lens I was able to achieve at that time was 200mm. nearly ten years since getting rid of that gear, I've though I could manage with something more than just a pocket camera. years of taking shots with a Kodak easyshare or fujifilm Xp60 camera are over, but I'm still hindered. I really have to watch what I'm doing or lifting. Granted I'm back on the path of collecting a new set of gear, but I'm being a bit more cautious with my purchases and how I carry them. So far I'm happy to report that my vintage tripod with tablet and camera mount is looking very good and will offer that assistant needed to better my shots. So to all those who think you're limited because of your injuries, or hindrances.. you can do it. I just need a new pair of glasses.
Oct 17, 2019 16:41:34 #
Earlier this year I got a Nikkor 200 to 500mm which as most of you know weighs a ton. So, before I set off for the Arctic I spent about 6 weeks doing some lifting of some weights (8lb. each). That worked nicely when trying to capture shots of polar bears and walruses from a zodiac bouncing through the ocean:-) I am 76, and I guess it all depends on what you want from life, eh?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.