Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Main Photography Discussion
D750 vs D500 for wildlife especially mammals.
Page <<first <prev 3 of 6 next> last>>
Oct 16, 2019 08:05:36   #
JeetND
 
DaveO wrote:
You're probably right. I am limited to a D7100, D7500, D500 and D850 and have done much research, but I'll keep reading.


Ok but i can't own that much gear.
Especially a D850 and a D500 and also D7500 together.

Reply
Oct 16, 2019 08:47:15   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
larryepage wrote:
My primary cameras are a D810 and a D850. A few months ago, I got a D500 for those occasions when I wanted excellent results, but wanted smaller files than those produced by the 850/810. I find that the D500 produces images equivalent to the 8XXs, apart from the difference in overall resolution. (I also have a D300s, mentioned above. I loved it when it replaced my D200, but it cannot in any way come close to what the newer cameras can do, especially low light.)

I do a lot of low light photography, including night sky photography. The D500 is not my primary camera for night sky because of wide angle limitations imposed by the smaller sensor. I have never encountered any meaningful low light limitations with it that cannot be overcome with good technique, despite hearing comments similar to yours in the past. It has always been essent9ially equivalent to both D8XXs in every important way.

In response to your specific noted concern, the D500 does have an internal focus motor. In fact, it is the most compatible of any Nikon with both older and newest lenses.

Please note that I do not emphasize photographing wildlife, but from my understanding of and experience with the D500, I do not see any reason that it should not be a good choice when coupled with appropriate lenses. And it will not cost $1000 to add a grip. Yes, a new one is about $400 US, but you do not need the big battery. Used Nikon grips are about $200. I cannot recommend any 3rd party grips. All seem to have some performance limitations.
My primary cameras are a D810 and a D850. A few mo... (show quote)


Re the $1000: My response to a reply, which I quoted and addressed, was in reference to the posters thought regarding a grip and a bigger battery. If you price the Nikon grip, battery door, battery and charger, the cost is approximately $1000.

Some thought that they could increase their FPS on some cameras by simply purchasing a bigger battery

Reply
Oct 17, 2019 07:09:09   #
nimbushopper Loc: Tampa, FL
 
JeetND wrote:
Yes i know the D500. I think it doesn't have a motor dedicated to Autofocus like the D5 but still the D500 is a beast. But can it handle 6400 ISO and above ?
I could get the reach if i buy a D7500 and also get 8 fps, 50 raw buffer.
I could get the low noise performance of a D750, if i buy used.
For the price of new D500, i could get a D750 used and a D7500 new.
I now focus with only 11 points of D3400 and never ran out of buffer and also the 51 points on D7100 seemed enough. Hardly will need 153 points, mostly will use Group autofocus (4 points) and single point.
Thanks
Yes i know the D500. I think it doesn't have a mot... (show quote)


The D500 is just fantastic at high ISO! Here's a sample I shot of Beauregard at 12500 ISO.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/37991479@N08/48121069367/in/dateposted/

Reply
 
 
Oct 17, 2019 07:11:17   #
DAN Phillips Loc: Graysville, GA
 
I have the D750 and a Sigma 150-600 lens. I am very well satisfied with the results I get.

Reply
Oct 17, 2019 07:19:56   #
MG Audet
 
If you can get a D500 -- do!!. Love my D500 with the Nikon 200 - 500 mm lens or the 300 mm F/4 (with 1.4 extender). Great for birds. I have ordered the new 500 mm F/5.6 PF, but back ordered. Renting it for a bird trip. The D7200 is also a great alternative (in my opinion) if you can't make the jump to the D500.

Michael

Reply
Oct 17, 2019 07:20:14   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
Oooh, now you're tempting me with the D500. : )

https://cameradecision.com/compare/nikon-d500-vs-nikon-d750

ISO
https://www.dpreview.com/articles/7774764205/fujifilm-x-t30-sony-a6400-added-to-studio-test-scene

https://cameradecision.com/compare/nikon-d500-vs-nikon-d750
https://www.digitalcameraworld.com/features/nikon-d500-vs-nikon-d750
https://www.dpreview.com/news/1419516967/nikon-d500-versus-d750-which-one-is-right-for-you
https://www.pcmag.com/compare/361792/nikon-d500-vs-nikon-d750

Reply
Oct 17, 2019 08:04:04   #
JeetND
 
jerryc41 wrote:
Oooh, now you're tempting me with the D500. : ) b... (show quote)

Thank you

Reply
 
 
Oct 17, 2019 08:04:30   #
JeetND
 
MG Audet wrote:
If you can get a D500 -- do!!. Love my D500 with the Nikon 200 - 500 mm lens or the 300 mm F/4 (with 1.4 extender). Great for birds. I have ordered the new 500 mm F/5.6 PF, but back ordered. Renting it for a bird trip. The D7200 is also a great alternative (in my opinion) if you can't make the jump to the D500.

Michael


Ok thanks

Reply
Oct 17, 2019 08:05:13   #
JeetND
 
DAN Phillips wrote:
I have the D750 and a Sigma 150-600 lens. I am very well satisfied with the results I get.


I am trying to get both used. Thanks

Reply
Oct 17, 2019 08:07:40   #
JeetND
 
nimbushopper wrote:
The D500 is just fantastic at high ISO! Here's a sample I shot of Beauregard at 12500 ISO.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/37991479@N08/48121069367/in/dateposted/


Thanks for the pic. I will get a D500.

Reply
Oct 17, 2019 08:14:26   #
JeetND
 
Thanks to all, I will get a D500 new or used, if new, then on Zero interest EMI.
I have found a D3s for 500 USD and D750 for 715 USD, which would be good as a second body.
The D3s is quite old and might have reached its shutter limit guaranteed by Nikon.
The D750 is around 30k shutter count.
Thanks

Reply
 
 
Oct 17, 2019 08:18:34   #
Bultaco Loc: Aiken, SC
 
nimbushopper wrote:
The D500 is just fantastic at high ISO! Here's a sample I shot of Beauregard at 12500 ISO.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/37991479@N08/48121069367/in/dateposted/


Thanks for posting. OP requested a high ISO image I checked about 100 shots and wasn't able to find one.

Reply
Oct 17, 2019 08:55:38   #
Juy Loc: Delaware
 
JeetND wrote:
Is it good above ISO 6400- ISO 8000 ?
I hate noise, thats it.


I have the D500 I will try to attach a file taken last year D500 Tamron 150-600 @ 420mm F8 1/1000 auto iso @8000
It really depends on the light you have and the sunject and contrast as to how well the image can appear with relation to noise. This shot surprised the heck out of me I never relized how high the iso was at the time. some PP and noise reduction produced a pretty decent image.


(Download)

Reply
Oct 17, 2019 10:12:29   #
ICN3S Loc: Cave Junction, OR
 
JeetND wrote:
D3 is a full frame and D300 is DX i think.


The D3 is full frame. I had 2 of them (purchased when they were released) until they died. I currently own a D600(for backup), D750 and D500. They are excellent cameras but I would gladly sell them all to get my D3's in working condition. The D850 is a great camera but I didn't want or need all those pixels. For wildlife I'd choose the D500!

Reply
Oct 17, 2019 10:18:44   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
ICN3S wrote:
The D3 is full frame. I had 2 of them (purchased when they were released) until they died. I currently own a D600(for backup), D750 and D500. They are excellent cameras but I would gladly sell them all to get my D3's in working condition. The D850 is a great camera but I didn't want or need all those pixels. For wildlife I'd choose the D500!


Recently got a Nikon D3s with less than 2000 clicks in box as new. Could not be happier. And, best of all, my charger for the D5 has a adapter for the D3s battery. Sometimes the planets do align.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.