SalvageDiver wrote:
Here is a picture of Stevens Peak taken this July from the Skyline Trail NE of Paradise in the Mt Rainier National Park. We had been in the clouds earlier in the afternoon and we followed the trail using GPS. The trail was not well marked and, at times, the clouds reduced visibility to just a few feet. As we got towards the latter half of the loop trail, the clouds broke and gave us this beautiful view of the local mountains.
Download the image and edit in any way you wish. Then submit your result to this thread. Entries will be accepted until 7 pm EDT, Thursday. Voting will run from Thursday evening until Sunday evening. The winner will host the following week's challenge. Thank you for your continued support. Have fun!
Attached are the raw image and a jpg exported directly from the unedited raw file. Hope you enjoy the scenery.
The raw file can be downloaded from the dropbox link below
https://www.dropbox.com/s/98osa8x6e4hhifa/DSC02281_L.dng?dl=0Mike
Here is a picture of Stevens Peak taken this July ... (
show quote)
A beautiful scene. I decided I'm ready for a change of season. I made it autumn. I also change crop and made it more square.
Erich
Congratulations on your win Mike and this great image to work with. It was dark so I lightened it up a little and added some pop.
I haven't posted a second edit in a while, and as I looked at the image again, It was the Blue Hour popping out at me.
my second go at it: Stevens Peak in late afternoon light
This group of images offers a real learning experience for me (in addition to the obvious display of post-processing skills!). We're constantly being told how important accurate color rendition is; we're told to calibrate our monitors, etc. etc.
And here we have a beautiful scene rendered with many variations on the "original" colors. And the images are all at least "acceptable" (most well beyond that!), right? I certainly don't mean to start a discussion here, it's the wrong place for that; just wondering...and learning....
srt101fan wrote:
This group of images offers a real learning experience for me (in addition to the obvious display of post-processing skills!). We're constantly being told how important accurate color rendition is; we're told to calibrate our monitors, etc. etc.
And here we have a beautiful scene rendered with many variations on the "original" colors. And the images are all at least "acceptable" (most well beyond that!), right? I certainly don't mean to start a discussion here, it's the wrong place for that; just wondering...and learning....
This group of images offers a real learning experi... (
show quote)
And, it's a fine wondering you have. Given human vision, so many color renderings are possible with a photo, as is evidenced here. The only concern I think we need is to make sure we know what the output will look like, as we post process--and there are several ways to do that, from expensive calibration steps to the old way of test strips and knowledge of our processes.
There is a gray area (surprise!) in the acceptable-ridiculous scale, both realistically and artistically. As my grandson taught me, "So what, right!?"
artBob wrote:
And, it's a fine wondering you have. Given human vision, so many color renderings are possible with a photo, as is evidenced here. The only concern I think we need is to make sure we know what the output will look like, as we post process--and there are several ways to do that, from expensive calibration steps to the old way of test strips and knowledge of our processes.
There is a gray area (surprise!) in the acceptable-ridiculous scale, both realistically and artistically. As my grandson taught me, "So what, right!?"
And, it's a fine wondering you have. Given human v... (
show quote)
Your grandson has the right idea Robert. Life is too short.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.