Is It Ever OK for a President to Ask a Foreign Country to Investigate a Political Rival? (Page 2): Most definitely, a failure for the republicans who are too blind to see it, a failure...

Kraken Loc: Barry's Bay

Wrangler wrote:

Do you include winning the presidential election a failure for the Republicans?

Most definitely, a failure for the republicans who are too blind to see it, a failure the democrats, America and the whole world.

Kmgw9v Loc: Miami, Florida

EyeSawYou wrote:

Why don’t you try educating yourself? Biden is the opponent of the other Democrat Presidential candidates not an opponent of Trump. As soon as Biden is nominated as the candidate, that is when Biden is an opponent of Trump.

Every Democratic candidate is a rival for Trump, well before the democratic general election candidate is chosen. The more and sooner each can be eliminated by any way possible only serves to make Trump’s re-election easier.

National Park

WNYShooter wrote:

The glaring fact that Libs are more up in arms about Trump looking into Biden's corruption than they are at Biden's corruption itself, tells you all you need to know about their selective outrage....

As per standard Liberal mantra, "OK for Thee but not for Me."

That’s because the allegations of Biden’s corruption, unlike Trump’s, have all been debunked. Wake up and think!

National Park

Wrangler wrote:

A lot of law is based on precedent. Did Hillary set the precedent on the issue. She paid for dirt on a political opponent. She was not charged

Trump didn’t pay for dirt. He has been charged. 😳😳😳

Is it ok for dems but not for Republicans?

In case you haven’t noticed, Hilary has never been President. She never used the Office of the Presidency to get dirt on a political rival by withholding congressional approved funds from a foreign nation. It’s ok for neither, but what you suggest is a false equivalency.

mjmoore17 Loc: Philadelphia, PA area

Wrangler wrote:

Do you include winning the presidential election a failure for the Republicans?

Again, the great deflection continues. Go comb your horse.

Wrangler Loc: North Texas

National Park wrote:

In case you haven’t noticed, Hilary has never been President. She never used the Office of the Presidency to get dirt on a political rival by withholding congressional approved funds from a foreign nation. It’s ok for neither, but what you suggest is a false equivalency.

I did notice that Hillary wasn’t elected President. Is it true that she used her position of Secretary if State and her party’s money to try to ruin President Trump.

The President of Ukraine said he felt no pressure. Are you calling him a liar?

Kraken Loc: Barry's Bay

Wrangler wrote:

I did notice that Hillary wasn’t elected President. Is true that she used her position of Secretary if State and her party’s money to try to ruin President Trump.

The President of Ukraine said he felt no pressure. Are you calling him a liar?

Yep. And I am Ukrainian and I can tell when a Uke is lying.

Kmgw9v Loc: Miami, Florida

Wrangler wrote:

I did notice that Hillary wasn’t elected President. Is it true that she used her position of Secretary if State and her party’s money to try to ruin President Trump.

The President of Ukraine said he felt no pressure. Are you calling him a liar?

What else would he say? The pressure that is upon him comes from the leader of the free world.
He has much to gain by comporting with Trump, and everything to lose by telling a different truth.
Stay real.

EyeSawYou

Kmgw9v wrote:

Every Democratic candidate is a rival for Trump, well before the democratic general election candidate is chosen. The more and sooner each can be eliminated by any way possible only serves to make Trump’s re-election easier.

Wrong again, Biden is not a nominee therefore he’s not a rival of Trump, Biden is a rival of the other Democrats he’s running against. Biden is Trumps rival, then why hasn’t there been any televised debate between Biden and Trump?

EyeSawYou

Kmgw9v wrote:

What else would he say? The pressure that is upon him comes from the leader of the free world.
He has much to gain by comporting with Trump, and everything to lose by telling a different truth.
Stay real.

lol OK so that you are implying that the Ukrainian president lied. I would like to see the evidence of this.

Kraken Loc: Barry's Bay

EyeSawYou wrote:

lol OK so that you are implying that the Ukrainian president lied. I would like to see the evidence of this.

Aren't you the one that calls everyone a liar? Why stop now?

Wrangler Loc: North Texas

mjmoore17 wrote:

Again, the great deflection continues. Go comb your horse.

All I did was ask you questions about your post. There was no deflection. It was a rule of law.

By the way, I take better care of my horses than you take of our country.

Read:
deflection
nounde·flec·tiondi-ˈflek-shən, dē-

1 : a turning aside or off course : deviation

Wrangler Loc: North Texas

National Park wrote:

In case you haven’t noticed, Hilary has never been President. She never used the Office of the Presidency to get dirt on a political rival by withholding congressional approved funds from a foreign nation. It’s ok for neither, but what you suggest is a false equivalency.

Where is the divert?

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

.

mjmoore17 Loc: Philadelphia, PA area

Wrangler wrote:

I did notice that Hillary wasn’t elected President. Is it true that she used her position of Secretary if State and her party’s money to try to ruin President Trump.

The President of Ukraine said he felt no pressure. Are you calling him a liar?

It matters not if he felt pressure or not. Trump tried to get a foreign country to re-investigate a political opponent. He withheld millions of dollars in military aid until he felt that they would re-investigate.

You are poorly deflecting from the crime that Trump committed. Why do you like criminals?