She's beautiful and beautifully posed. Well done!
I'm in the group with travelwp and Photoserj among others! I have a daughter that has a one-inch infinity sign on her left foot along with 8 other girlfriends as a symbol of "together-forever". That much I can accept.
insman1132 wrote:
Obviously a very personal thing. Nothing really more right or more wrong about one's choice. For this old duck, I just find those two tatoo's on those otherwise magnificent breasts to be distracting to the female form.
I find this a far better model than the skinny anorexic prepubescent boy looking models that are generally shown here. Yes to each their own and this model is very beautiful and the shot extremely well done.
I'm in the group that cannot grow.
This is a very pleasing photo of a good looking female. Not to piss anyone off but on her the tattoos look very good. I volunteer my services to water the roses!!!🤣🤣🤣🤣
This is a very pleasing photo of a very good looking young lady. In MHO I think the roses look good on her breasts.
I like the fact that she is a "normal" woman, that is, not a starved looking model. However, I'm in the group that prefers unmarked, unpierced presentations.
--Bob
2nefoto wrote:
I'm betting a plethora of viewers will think tattoo on female is unflattering. This opinion difference should be what inspires and broadens perspectives. Without it, we cannot grow. MHO
As photographers, do we shun those who are not in mainstream in what is considered acceptable?
Holding a different opinion is shunning?
"shun" = unfortunate choice of highly negative word = "to ignore someone and not speak to that person because you cannot accept their behavior, beliefs, etc." (Cambridge English Dictionary)
I appreciate the vocabulary lashing. However, theignored premise is the ^ negative^ commentary relative to females who do not adhere to specific "norms". Commentary appears to denote these women do not deserve to be photographed, they are unworthy of being in front of the camera and heaven forbid their images be displayed via this milieu. Perhaps your delve into the dictionary will produce a term more to your liking.
In my opinion, shun seems to be a bit harsh. The model is lovely. It's just my personal preference that I'd prefer no ink or metal. I don't think you should take it as an affront if others don't share your preference in models. It's just the way the world works. If I were given a chance to photograph her, I'd probably accept that chance. However, I'm not sure the results would be my best work, as the decorations are not to my liking. That can definitely affect the outcome of the session.
--Bob
2nefoto wrote:
As photographers, do we shun those who are not in mainstream in what is considered acceptable?
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.