Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Canon 50mm
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Sep 18, 2019 16:13:02   #
rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
 
rcarol wrote:
You said, " My post suggested a way to think about the problem." And just how did your post do that? I'm really missing something here.

Think about it.

Reply
Sep 18, 2019 17:21:41   #
rcarol
 
rehess wrote:
Think about it.


I'm to old To waste my brain cells by playing your silly game.

Reply
Sep 18, 2019 17:22:17   #
rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
 
rcarol wrote:
I'm to old To waste my brain cells by playing your silly game.

So stop playing your silly game.

Reply
 
 
Sep 18, 2019 20:35:42   #
rcarol
 
rehess wrote:
So stop playing your silly game.


Do you mean your empty-headed game?

Reply
Sep 18, 2019 20:50:17   #
rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
 
rcarol wrote:
Do you mean your empty-headed game?

This is not a game.

Sorry you cannot - or will not - understand.

Reply
Sep 18, 2019 21:58:57   #
poortrucker4838
 
Thanks a lot for the information I just can't see spending that much after viewing your comments. I just play at photography I needed something to keep me busy in retirement.

thank all of you

Reply
Sep 19, 2019 01:18:31   #
rcarol
 
rehess wrote:
This is not a game.

Sorry you cannot - or will not - understand.


"This is not a game." You haven't deluded yourself into thinking this is a serious conversation, have you?

Reply
 
 
Sep 19, 2019 01:50:48   #
graybeard
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
The 50L is a wonderful lens at every aperture. It's rather 'artistic' between f/1.2 and f/2 due to the shallow depth of field. The 50L is also heavy and rugged along with expensive. If you just want a 50mm lens, the f/1.8 lens is everywhere as good as both the more expensive lenses from f/2.8 onward. Saving $1000 with the f/1.4 still gives a solid lens, and much more sturdy than the f/1.8. Consider your "true" needs in the f/1.2 to f/2.8 range as the f/1.8 is an excellent lens, and don't let it's price fool you into thinking you need to spend more unless your need for f/1.2 to f/2.8 is the reason to spend more.

I've also used the Zeiss Makro-Planar T50 f/2 ZE. It's a manual focus lens, but does give a focus confirmation. It has an excellent image quality at f/2 onward, both colors and sharpness. It's heavy too being all metal and glass. The unique image characteristics, again in the f/1.2 to f/2.8 range, would be reasons to choose one of the more expensive options over the EF 50 f/1.8.
The 50L is a wonderful lens at every aperture. It'... (show quote)


I think there is entirely too much hoopla about the F/1.8... esp since today with digital camera's we have variable ISO and a true 3 way triangle, as opposed to having the ISO fixed by the film speed. I used to load ASA 800 film and my F/1.8, and later F/1.4 Mamiya/Sekor lenses and go out at night and hope I could get decent enough exposures. Now the importance of fast lenses has decreased somewhat. I suppose I will be dismissed as a cretin for saying that, but I did buy a Canon 1.8 50mm and find I rarely use it.

Reply
Sep 19, 2019 02:11:01   #
Haydon
 
poortrucker4838 wrote:
Is a Canon 50mm f/1.2L USM Lens worth $1200.00 more than a Canon EF 50mm F/1.4 USM Lens for Canon that seems to be quite a lot money.


Maybe it's best to see how an artistic professional uses wide open apertures like the 50 1.2L and 85 1.2L. It's the out of focus area bathed in etheric light that makes the magic. Elena still uses her Canon stuff despite moving over to Sony. Much of it has to do with the F1.2 apertures which gives it's own unique look.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/75571860@N06/

Reply
Sep 20, 2019 10:54:17   #
ez22 Loc: The World
 
My favorite lens. Definitely worth every penny.

Reply
Sep 20, 2019 11:22:30   #
rcarol
 
Haydon wrote:
Maybe it's best to see how an artistic professional uses wide open apertures like the 50 1.2L and 85 1.2L. It's the out of focus area bathed in etheric light that makes the magic. Elena still uses her Canon stuff despite moving over to Sony. Much of it has to do with the F1.2 apertures which gives it's own unique look.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/75571860@N06/


Thanks for sharing that link with us. I looked at her Flickr account and I think that her work is stunning, to say the least.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.