krispix wrote:
I would suggest a Circular Polarising Filter (DO NOT GET A LINEAR) is the first filter anyone should buy, and do not skimp on price. They are costly, but the cheap ones are evident.
They do two jobs and you have to rotate them on the lens for best effect. They reduce (or almost eliminate) reflections on glass, water etc. and they will make the sky a darker blue so your white fluffy clouds stand out more.
The effectiveness is all about angles. For the sky, the best results will be when the sun is at 90 degrees to the shot. To reduce reflections is a bit more complicated and is best done by trial & error.
Just a tip. Do not wear polarising sunglasses when using this filter unless you like staring at a black viewfinder!
I would suggest a Circular Polarising Filter (DO N... (
show quote)
Well I'll be buggered!! I didn't skimp on price, (I don't think, $AU260.00) but I never realised the rest of it, because I have a lens hood attached as well. Stuff Me!! I have to reassess this damned thing:) Thank You Krispix!!:)
Pulseight wrote:
medlowa wrote:
I am going to Monument Valley, do I need a polarizing filter?
Just a question from an ignorant Aussie, what's the difference between Monument Valley and Mount Rushmore? I learned a little about the Mount at college nearly 60 years ago, but Monument Valley is new to me.
Monument Valley is in the deserts of southwest Arizona and Utah on the Navajo Indian Reservation. There are red rock sandstone spires and other interesting shapes. It is fabulous! I live about 65 miles from there.
http://navajonationparks.org/htm/monumentvalley.htm
planepics
Loc: St. Louis burbs, but originally Chicago burbs
Here's an example of removing reflections.
Definitely YES. See image, taken with a polarizer in Monument valley..
Monument Valley.
Mount Rushmore is a national monument in the Dakotas, and is a mountain carved into a sculpture depicting four important US Presidents. Monument Valley is an incredible scenic location in Arizona dominated by "monumental" mesas and towering rock formations. If you are a fan of classic American western movies, you have probably seen Monument Valley.
As for a polarizing filter, it is, IMHO, one of the must have pieces of equipment that any photographer who shoots outdoors needs to have in his or her camera bag. They are extremely useful, and in some conditions positively essential. They help cut glare and reflections (especially on water), help cut through haze, can improve overall contrast, and can help enhance colors (blue skies are bluer, clouds "pop"). There are some things to learn about using them (they can cause a vinyette on wide angle lens, they are not very useful on overcast days, their effect depends on the angle of the sun relative to you shooting direction) but the learning curve is not very steep. All in all, a polarizing filter is a good investment, especially for shooting in the sunny Southwest.
mcveed
Loc: Kelowna, British Columbia (between trips)
Do you "need" one? Do you need one for what? Get a circular polarizer and ply with it and you will find that, indeed, you do "need" one. Once you see the benefits you won't leave home without it.
mcveed
Loc: Kelowna, British Columbia (between trips)
jbslord wrote:
POolarizing filters are not a bad idea. I usually have one on the camera lense as added protection against lense damage. Filters aren't cheap until you compare it with the lense they're with. Then they are
Yes. Essential for protection, no.1. Most desireable for enrichment of color, eliminating glare, etc. in those situations where its features apply, no.2. Ehance deep blue skys of the valley, when the filter will enhance them, no.3.
I have a polarizing filter on each one of my Canon lenses. Take them off when not needed or when I need the extra speed.
Topic has been covered many times here.
I think a polarizer is one of the few essential real-world filters that remain -- some of its effects cannot be duplicated in software.
I'll reiterate that you'll want to get what is called a "circular polarizer," or CPL. A linear polarizer can provide the same effects, but is likely to interfere with the metering systems in today's cameras. In fact, it might be harder to find a linear polarizer today than a CPL, other than on eBay.
I wouldn't rely on a CPL for lens protection, however. First, I don't like to use any filter for that purpose except in certain conditions. Second, a polarizing filter reduces the light coming into the lens, so using it indoors, for example, may make it harder for your lens to autofocus or to shoot handheld shots. Also, there are times when you won't want the effects it can provide. Use a polarizer for a reason, and if you don't have a reason to use it for a specific shot, don't.
CResQ
Loc: Cobble Hill, BC
This hobby of mine just gets more and more expensive but boy I am learning so much from UHH. Thanks.
krispix wrote:
I would suggest a Circular Polarising Filter (DO NOT GET A LINEAR) is the first filter anyone should buy, and do not skimp on price. They are costly, but the cheap ones are evident.
They do two jobs and you have to rotate them on the lens for best effect. They reduce (or almost eliminate) reflections on glass, water etc. and they will make the sky a darker blue so your white fluffy clouds stand out more.
The effectiveness is all about angles. For the sky, the best results will be when the sun is at 90 degrees to the shot. To reduce reflections is a bit more complicated and is best done by trial & error.
Just a tip. Do not wear polarising sunglasses when using this filter unless you like staring at a black viewfinder!
I would suggest a Circular Polarising Filter (DO N... (
show quote)
How do you know you aren't getting a "cheap one"...especially when buying on line? I know that for a lot of things, price is not necessarily an indicator of quality.
medlowa wrote:
I am going to Monument Valley, do I need a polarizing filter?
YES, regardless of where you're going.
DakotAZ wrote:
krispix wrote:
I would suggest a Circular Polarising Filter (DO NOT GET A LINEAR) is the first filter anyone should buy, and do not skimp on price. They are costly, but the cheap ones are evident.
They do two jobs and you have to rotate them on the lens for best effect. They reduce (or almost eliminate) reflections on glass, water etc. and they will make the sky a darker blue so your white fluffy clouds stand out more.
The effectiveness is all about angles. For the sky, the best results will be when the sun is at 90 degrees to the shot. To reduce reflections is a bit more complicated and is best done by trial & error.
Just a tip. Do not wear polarising sunglasses when using this filter unless you like staring at a black viewfinder!
I would suggest a Circular Polarising Filter (DO N... (
show quote)
How do you know you aren't getting a "cheap one"...especially when buying on line? I know that for a lot of things, price is not necessarily an indicator of quality.
quote=krispix I would suggest a Circular Polarisi... (
show quote)
B+W, Hoya, and others with multi-coated glass are what you want. Do not get an uncoated filter, as it can degrade your images. I have the Hoya HMC filter and it is excellent.
Leicaflex wrote:
medlowa wrote:
I am going to Monument Valley, do I need a polarizing filter?
I am not familiar with Monument Valley, but if it has lakes, water falls and lots of reflective surfaces, then I would advise you purchase a circular polarising filter. If you have several lenses which you plan to take, purchase the filter that has the largest diameter to match your lens with the largest diameter. Then purchase Stepping Rings to match your other lenses. That way, you only need purchase one polarising filter and using the stepping rings you can use the filter on all your other lenses.
Use the polarising filter at ninety degrees to the sun for the best effect and purchase a quality filter.
quote=medlowa I am going to Monument Valley, do I... (
show quote)
Well, Pilgrim, it's time to watch a John Wayne movie!!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.