rehess
Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
Keen wrote:
Try selling a fuzzy snap to National Geographic. See how far you get.
That falls under his “technical photography” exception.
rehess wrote:
That falls under his “technical photography” exception.
Esactly. Thank you.
The poster was just trying to pit a finer point on the many pointless points.
Although Nat Geo's printing process has never favored critical sharpness, they always placed content at the forefront. The big failure of digital is that it has placed technology at the forefront. I"m ready to see content there.
Remember, nothing will ever be the sharpest, there will always be something newer and better. This is not the time to obsess, it's time to be happy with what you have and work on your skills.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.