katu41 wrote:
This morning my wife looked at a photo hanging in my office and commented that it could have been done better. I took the photo of the inside pool at the Hearst Castle more than 10 years ago when my photo skills were primitive. While my skills are somewhat improved, given the back lighting of the large windows, I am not sure I could have done much better.
A few weeks ago I was working on old photos for conversion to black and white and decided I wanted to see what the old Hearst pool photo would look like in black and white. I found the photo and showed it to my wife. Her comments of the old photo were quite negative. I agreed that lacking color totally changed the faithful reproduction of the space. However, B&W also opened up detail that I could not find in the original photo. (I thought the enhanced reflection was quite cool.) My wife found the reflection of the water very confusing and the black and white line distracted from the subject. What!
After 5 minutes of fruitless arguing, I have decided to leave it to the Hoggs to make a few comments on the merits, or lack thereof, of each photo. Given the difficult lighting of the images, I know this photo is not ideal. That said, I need some help in settling our dispute.
This morning my wife looked at a photo hanging in ... (
show quote)
I like both versions, nice details shown, not confusing at all.