A new poll shows what really interests 'pro-lifers': controlling women Jill Filipovic (Page 3): And you care about those deaths? Not if you don't care about life at its most innocent.

Rose42

jcboy3 wrote:

And that is what seems to bug the anti-abortionist... (show quote)

And you care about those deaths? Not if you don't care about life at its most innocent. The pro death crowd has its own hypocrisy. They too are involved in the military actions and the deaths of innocents.

Alcohol is responsible for far more deaths and injuries than guns. Its abused by children - as are drugs - and costs us far more.

You care about lives? Ban alcohol and do a better job of eliminating opiates.

Quote:

They should be wanting to rid this country of guns, make cars as safe as possible, eliminate drunk driving as much as possible (as in you CAN'T drive if drunk because a breathalizer keeps you from doing so, or you have to turn in your keys if you go to a bar), and put an end to US engaging in foreign wars.

Ridding the country of guns is not the answer. The alt left won't address fundamental issues so their answer is ban. Deny people their right to defend themselves and instead rely on government which won't work.

Many of us are all for ending our engagement in foreign wars. On both sides, the political leaders don't necessarily reflect what their constituents believe. They have their own agendas.

Quote:

Not to mention health care. Oh yes, lets make sure you have your baby, but lets make sure you don't have decent health care to keep it healthy and alive. If life is so precious, then there should be no limit to the resources spent by this country to keep its citizens safe and healthy.

These things are not the goal of the "pro-lifers", and so life must not be the primary purpose of their movement.

The left gets hysterical over guns as you demonstrate here.

You don't know many pro-lifers. A lot of us want better healthcare and access for all but government keeps failing in that regard - democrats too.

LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America

thom w wrote:

Why are you breathing air that could be used by more deserving.

Ahhhh ... let your butthurt flow.

yhtomit Loc: Port Land. Oregon

Texcaster wrote:

According to their own survey responses, anti-abor... (show quote)

Wu whoooooo! Kill babies everybody!!!kill kill kill kill kill...

Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa

Frank T wrote:

Poor little girl. I know you're going to get your panties in a wad over this but, 58% of American support be the right of a woman to control her own body. They are Pro-Choice.
So you see, the majority of people think you're wrong.
Hey wait! I've got an idea. If you don't like abortions, don't have one.

Little Frankie, you lie again, shame on you. Democrats support abortion murder, no matter how far along a pregnant woman is? 68 or 75 percent of Americans oppose that. Here little guy, let me get the information for you to prove you are wrong. So, once again you did not tell the truth. Tell me, why do democrats have to lie so much? I guess because facts do no support their leftist ideology.

https://www.apnews.com/dec1f82c4c630cb97ab7cefc58cf0866

Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa

thom w wrote:

Why are you breathing air that could be used by more deserving.

Why are you little Tommie, that air could be breathed by new born babies.

jcboy3

Rose42 wrote:

And you care about those deaths? Not if you don't ... (show quote)

Sorry, but you are drawing an incorrect conclusion. I do care about the death of people. I do not care about the death of fetuses. It really is that simple. You think there is a conflict, but only because you think that a fetus is a person.

In addition, while I am concerned about the affects of drugs and alcohol on people, I think people should be able to use drugs and alcohol as long as they don't harm other people. I also think people should be able to commit suicide, but also they should be able to get mental health treatment. You should't have to try to commit suicide to get your problems recognized and treated. Opiates have always been a problem, but better access to alternatives might help.

Ridding the country of guns might certainly be the answer; restricting access and restricting which guns are available most certainly will be an answer. It is the case in most countries.

This country's affinity for war is bipartisan. It is driven by greed, paranoia, racism, jingoism. You name it, slaughtering innocent people is a characteristic of American foreign policy.

I hardly think I was hysterical about guns; one brief statement about guns in my post cannot qualify as hysteria.

As for healthcare, Republicans have been doggedly consistent about repealing the ACA. They have claimed a desire to replace it, but have no concrete proposals to do so. They have not addressed other health care issues, most specifically the cost of prescriptions and the limitation on Medicare negotiating drug prices.

Republicans are not proposing changes to the ACA to fix it's problems; in fact they are doing what they can to exacerbate those problems in the hope of crippling the ACA and eventually repealing it. This is not an action taken with the intent to improve health care in America.

I look forward to Republicans marching in the streets demanding better health care, lower drug costs, stricter environmental protection (for clean air, water, food...), safer streets and neighborhoods, and an end to wars of aggression. I doubt it will happen, because instead of focusing on issues pertaining to people, they are focused on the issue of making more people by restricting abortion.

yhtomit Loc: Port Land. Oregon

jcboy3 wrote:

Sorry, but you are drawing an incorrect conclusion. I do care about the death of people. I do not care about the death of fetuses. It really is that simple. You think there is a conflict, but only because you think that a fetus is a person.

In addition, while I am concerned about the affects of drugs and alcohol on people, I think people should be able to use drugs and alcohol as long as they don't harm other people. I also think people should be able to commit suicide, but also they should be able to get mental health treatment. You should't have to try to commit suicide to get your problems recognized and treated. Opiates have always been a problem, but better access to alternatives might help.

Ridding the country of guns might certainly be the answer; restricting access and restricting which guns are available most certainly will be an answer. It is the case in most countries.

This country's affinity for war is bipartisan. It is driven by greed, paranoia, racism, jingoism. You name it, slaughtering innocent people is a characteristic of American foreign policy.

I hardly think I was hysterical about guns; one brief statement about guns in my post cannot qualify as hysteria.

As for healthcare, Republicans have been doggedly consistent about repealing the ACA. They have claimed a desire to replace it, but have no concrete proposals to do so. They have not addressed other health care issues, most specifically the cost of prescriptions and the limitation on Medicare negotiating drug prices.

Republicans are not proposing changes to the ACA to fix it's problems; in fact they are doing what they can to exacerbate those problems in the hope of crippling the ACA and eventually repealing it. This is not an action taken with the intent to improve health care in America.

I look forward to Republicans marching in the streets demanding better health care, lower drug costs, stricter environmental protection (for clean air, water, food...), safer streets and neighborhoods, and an end to wars of aggression. I doubt it will happen, because instead of focusing on issues pertaining to people, they are focused on the issue of making more people by restricting abortion.

Sorry, but you are drawing an incorrect conclusion... (show quote)

What species is this fetus?
Homelessness and mental healthcare needs to be addressed by all countries.
You don't understand our 2nd amendment. Guns are good for preventing tyranny. Learn.
"slaughtering innocent people is a characteristic" of war. Abolish bad guys.
Republicans want clean, air, water...
Making more people? Whats your source aside from your feelings?
Free market healthcare, that's what republicans want.

Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa

jcboy3 wrote:

Sorry, but you are drawing an incorrect conclusion. I do care about the death of people. I do not care about the death of fetuses. It really is that simple. You think there is a conflict, but only because you think that a fetus is a person.

In addition, while I am concerned about the affects of drugs and alcohol on people, I think people should be able to use drugs and alcohol as long as they don't harm other people. I also think people should be able to commit suicide, but also they should be able to get mental health treatment. You should't have to try to commit suicide to get your problems recognized and treated. Opiates have always been a problem, but better access to alternatives might help.

Ridding the country of guns might certainly be the answer; restricting access and restricting which guns are available most certainly will be an answer. It is the case in most countries.

This country's affinity for war is bipartisan. It is driven by greed, paranoia, racism, jingoism. You name it, slaughtering innocent people is a characteristic of American foreign policy.

I hardly think I was hysterical about guns; one brief statement about guns in my post cannot qualify as hysteria.

As for healthcare, Republicans have been doggedly consistent about repealing the ACA. They have claimed a desire to replace it, but have no concrete proposals to do so. They have not addressed other health care issues, most specifically the cost of prescriptions and the limitation on Medicare negotiating drug prices.

Republicans are not proposing changes to the ACA to fix it's problems; in fact they are doing what they can to exacerbate those problems in the hope of crippling the ACA and eventually repealing it. This is not an action taken with the intent to improve health care in America.

I look forward to Republicans marching in the streets demanding better health care, lower drug costs, stricter environmental protection (for clean air, water, food...), safer streets and neighborhoods, and an end to wars of aggression. I doubt it will happen, because instead of focusing on issues pertaining to people, they are focused on the issue of making more people by restricting abortion.

Sorry, but you are drawing an incorrect conclusion... (show quote)

You do not care about the death of fetuses, which are babies. Tell us all again why someone should listen to you little boy.

OMG,you think people should be able to use drugs and alcohol at will, and they should be able to commit suicide. The USA is not a country for you, it will never become that level of crazy. If dems think like you, they will destroy themselves and we can all watch. Little boy, search for a place that fits your mental deficiencies.

soba1 Loc: Somewhere In So Ca

Rose42 wrote:

That doesn’t begin to touch the depravity of the pro death crowd championing 2000 killings every day mostly for convenience.

Murder is murder.........................

Angmo

jcboy3 wrote:

Sorry, but you are drawing an incorrect conclusion. I do care about the death of people. I do not care about the death of fetuses. It really is that simple. You think there is a conflict, but only because you think that a fetus is a person.

In addition, while I am concerned about the affects of drugs and alcohol on people, I think people should be able to use drugs and alcohol as long as they don't harm other people. I also think people should be able to commit suicide, but also they should be able to get mental health treatment. You should't have to try to commit suicide to get your problems recognized and treated. Opiates have always been a problem, but better access to alternatives might help.

Ridding the country of guns might certainly be the answer; restricting access and restricting which guns are available most certainly will be an answer. It is the case in most countries.

This country's affinity for war is bipartisan. It is driven by greed, paranoia, racism, jingoism. You name it, slaughtering innocent people is a characteristic of American foreign policy.

I hardly think I was hysterical about guns; one brief statement about guns in my post cannot qualify as hysteria.

As for healthcare, Republicans have been doggedly consistent about repealing the ACA. They have claimed a desire to replace it, but have no concrete proposals to do so. They have not addressed other health care issues, most specifically the cost of prescriptions and the limitation on Medicare negotiating drug prices.

Republicans are not proposing changes to the ACA to fix it's problems; in fact they are doing what they can to exacerbate those problems in the hope of crippling the ACA and eventually repealing it. This is not an action taken with the intent to improve health care in America.

I look forward to Republicans marching in the streets demanding better health care, lower drug costs, stricter environmental protection (for clean air, water, food...), safer streets and neighborhoods, and an end to wars of aggression. I doubt it will happen, because instead of focusing on issues pertaining to people, they are focused on the issue of making more people by restricting abortion.

Sorry, but you are drawing an incorrect conclusion... (show quote)

500, government does not belong in healthcare. The market was healthier without Obakapig care.

I see this daily. It sucks.

jcboy3

yhtomit wrote:

What species is this fetus?
Homelessness and mental healthcare needs to be addressed by all countries.
You don't understand our 2nd amendment. Guns are good for preventing tyranny. Learn.
"slaughtering innocent people is a characteristic" of war. Abolish bad guys.
Republicans want clean, air, water...
Making more people? Whats your source aside from your feelings?
Free market healthcare, that's what republicans want.

You might read "A Libertarian’s Case Against Free Markets in Health Care"

https://thehealthcareblog.com/blog/2018/08/02/a-libertarians-case-against-free-markets-in-healthcare/

Free Market Health Care is not health care for all.

yhtomit Loc: Port Land. Oregon

jcboy3 wrote:

You might read "A Libertarian’s Case Against Free Markets in Health Care"

https://thehealthcareblog.com/blog/2018/08/02/a-libertarians-case-against-free-markets-in-healthcare/

Free Market Health Care is not health care for all.

Anything else stifles innovation.

wilpharm Loc: Oklahoma

Frank T wrote:

Not shocked at all.
The wingers in this site are scared to death of powerful women.

since when did you classify yourself as a winger??..but...not surprised..you act like a little girl..

Frank T Loc: New York, NY

wilpharm wrote:

since when did you classify yourself as a winger??..but...not surprised..you act like a little girl..

How's that fruit picking job going for you?

jcboy3

Elaine2025 wrote:

You do not care about the death of fetuses, which are babies. Tell us all again why someone should listen to you little boy.

OMG,you think people should be able to use drugs and alcohol at will, and they should be able to commit suicide. The USA is not a country for you, it will never become that level of crazy. If dems think like you, they will destroy themselves and we can all watch. Little boy, search for a place that fits your mental deficiencies.

22