Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Second Best for Olympus
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
Jul 30, 2019 14:54:34   #
sab2101 Loc: Henderson Nv.
 
I have the Panny 12-60 (F3.5-5.6) came as a kit lens and I am very happy with the results. I have it on a Lumix g-85, not a bad combo...........Mike

Reply
Jul 30, 2019 20:07:55   #
coullone Loc: Paynesville, Victoria, Australia
 
My lens I normally use is the 14-150 and highly recommend it, I also have the 12-40 and an older 40-150. The older lens is not as sharp as the 14-150 BUT it seems to be better made. Work that out!

Reply
Jul 31, 2019 22:31:59   #
User ID
 
SteveG wrote:

I do the same! Always buy second hand. Refurbished.
Plenty of like new equipment for a huge savings!


So true !!!

I almost feel pangs of guilt reading this thread.
My OMD M5-II came with the 14-150 ver.II as
and open box special ... $500 for the whole kit.

In the shop I just assumed the 14-150 was the
old model that was cleared out at $100 NOS ...
and only later did I notice it was the new ver.II
model. Anywho, I do tend to laff inside about
all the argument all over the forums about the
absolute wisest choices, including ubiquitous
faux-wise "what type of subjects" replies ...

The real best answer is buy whatever you find
a great deal on, be happy, and go use it :-)

Reply
Check out Digital Artistry section of our forum.
Aug 1, 2019 07:23:04   #
Nancysc
 
So happy to read that you are having a good laff (sic) at the rest of us who enjoy reading the opinions and advice of those with experience on a topic of interest. I don't take these as "arguments" but rather discussion. Keep on reading so that you can be entertained by our queries and faux-wise (sic) answers. Good to know you are "vrai-wise".

Reply
Aug 1, 2019 12:38:59   #
Vurnman Loc: Nevada City, California
 
A wise man once told me "It's only a deal if you get what you want." The first thing to consider when shopping for a lens is not the price, but whether or not that lens will do what you need it to do. I have a 14-150 that fit my needs when I bought it, but is not usable for most of my recent shooting because it is too slow. It works fine for a lot of things, but not indoor sports so I don't thing the questions about how a product will be used are faux-wise at all, but rather may serve to encourage an enlightedned decision.

Reply
Aug 1, 2019 18:40:53   #
User ID
 
Nancysc wrote:
So happy to read that you are having a good laff (sic) at the rest of us who enjoy reading the opinions and advice of those with experience on a topic of interest. I don't take these as "arguments" but rather discussion. Keep on reading so that you can be entertained by our queries and faux-wise (sic) answers. Good to know you are "vrai-wise".



Reply
Aug 1, 2019 18:48:36   #
User ID
 
Vurnman wrote:
A wise man once told me "It's only a deal if you get what you want." The first thing to consider when shopping for a lens is not the price, but whether or not that lens will do what you need it to do. I have a 14-150 that fit my needs when I bought it, but is not usable for most of my recent shooting because it is too slow. It works fine for a lot of things, but not indoor sports so I don't thing the questions about how a product will be used are faux-wise at all, but rather may serve to encourage an enlightedned decision.
A wise man once told me "It's only a deal if ... (show quote)


Nope. I stand by my "philosophy". Buy whatever is a great
deal, use it and be happy. Indoor sport ? Sure, a faster lens
is a good idea. But I won't query the geek pool about which
faster lens is ideal or even better. I'll find a deal, be happy,
and go shoot some indoor sport. And until I find my deal I
can still shoot indoor sports at f/5.6 ... altho there WILL be
some high-ISO noise involved.

I do tend to use my 2.8 zoom [bought used, cheap, from a
friend] at about 5.6 anyway. DoF at 2.8 or even 3.5 is not
usually favorable for live subjects.

So, find a good deal, buy it, use it, be happy !

Reply
Check out Printers and Color Printing Forum section of our forum.
Aug 1, 2019 21:25:58   #
n3eg Loc: West coast USA
 
I use the 14-150 on my E-M5 II all the time. Light and versatile, and IQ is between the kit lenses and the PRO series.

Reply
Aug 26, 2019 20:51:59   #
Hip Coyote
 
SteveG wrote:
I've recently switched to an Olympus OM-D EM5 MARK II. I want to put 12-40mm f2.8 on it to start but the price, is a bit high. Any suggestions for second best choices? I'm looking possibly at some long range zooms? From Panasonic or Olympus? Olympus Digital 14-150mm f4-5.6 II M.Zuiko ED MS? Panasonic Lumix G 14-140mm F3.5-5.6 Vario Power O.I.S. HD Lens MFT? So I don't need two lenses. Im also looking at the Panasonic 12-32mm??

Possibly Panasonic Lumix G 12-60mm F3.5-5.6 Power O.I.S. MFT Len?
I've recently switched to an Olympus OM-D EM5 MARK... (show quote)


Im a bit confused...you want a 12-40 mm (24 to 80 equivalent) but then want long range zoom? Can I suggest that you take a look at what you shot in the past and see what focal lengths you predominately use? There are programs (I use jfdata which is a plug in for lightroom that tells me my focal lengths used...it is a great tool.).

I have the Oly 12-100 pro lens and the 14-150 Oly described in your post. It is a sufficient lens, water resistant, light, etc. One suggestion might be to consider used...go to the MU43 forum and you will see quite a few lenses for sale. There is a 12-40 Pro for sale at about $450.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Bridge Camera Show Case section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.