I have a 50mm lens and a 18-135 mm lens. I'm headed in the Boudoir direction. I wanted to know if there is a nicer/better/more creative lens out there I could use. Also is there a website anyone knows about that has lenses and explains each one? Please pass along the link if you know of one.
Thanks
dasboat
Loc: Vernonia,Ore.(Vernowhere)
swabubin wrote:
I have a 50mm lens and a 18-135 mm lens. I'm headed in the Boudoir direction. I wanted to know if there is a nicer/better/more creative lens out there I could use. Also is there a website anyone knows about that has lenses and explains each one? Please pass along the link if you know of one.
Thanks
Makes a difference if you are shooting a crop or full frame.
My next lens for this type of shooting will hopefully be the 85mm 1.2.
Also check a few sellers on Nextag for price comparison.
Don' buy from cheapest; classic bait & switch crook.
The only thing I would say is get the widest aperture you can for focus or more accurately de-focus control. Or consider the Nikon 135mm with de-focus control. A lens called Lensbaby is another focus control option that is much cheaper. Another technique is to shoot through a paine of glass positioned in front of the lens. On this glass you can smear petroleum jelly to selectively cause a soft focus condition in whatever area of the picture you desire.
I have heard of people using a neutral density filter (I think it's called) and smearing petroleum jelly around the edges to soften the image with a slight vignetting (sp?) effect.
foghornleg90
Loc: All over USA - Medford, OR & Knoxville, TN
I agree mostly with 'imagemister' - the wider the aperature ability, the better, since everything will be indoors, prone to low light and shadows, unless you are setting up a pile of lights & multiple flashes with remote triggers.
I have a f1.8 135 with 2 step soft focus, an 85 f1.8, and a 17-55 f2.8 for portrait & indoor low light stuff. I've used my buddies 10-24 f1.2 and it's OMG nice, but I don't shoot enough of THAT to justify the $2k price tag, and I can get within about 5 to 10% as good with the lens I have in post processing. So... it's all about how much you'll be using them, and how much you'll be making.
There is a huge surge in the old style 'poster girls' and 1930's to 50's erotica poses... might be worth checking out.
As a big ugly man... I don't get many invites for those type of shoots. I have a couple female photography friends that shoot 1 to 10 of those type of shoots most every week. Most 'normal women' just don't wanna get all naked & sexy in front of a single man.
The petroleum jelly isn't necessary if you do any post-processing.
The ND filters... is really dependent on the lighting, walls, and type(s) of ND's you are using. I can't think of many occasions I'd use them on an indoor portrait... unless the person was almost glow in the dark white, or there were a lot of reflective objects above the person. Then I'd probably play with the graduated ND +2. Lighting and background control are vital... I'd probably be more inclined to shoot with at least two off-camera flashes to try to eliminate the shadows (or to create them). Anyhow...
Creativelive.com has some great portrait & lighting courses... but none on nude photography or boudoir stuff to date (that I know of).
If you haven't played with it yet, you might look into 'light painting' it's REALLY cool & fun... and interesting.
I think you're really in pretty good shape for lenses. I suspect the zoom is a little slow and you may be useing the wide end a lot. If you find yourself shooting wide a lot you might want to invest in a 24 or 28 mm F2.8, but use what you got first and see if you actually need something else. You can be shooting inside so I would avoid neutral density anything. You might want to think about saving the money for some good lighting equipment.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.