Check out Advice from the Pros section of our forum.
My first Milky Way
Jul 15, 2019 06:36:11 #
Bayouguy
Loc: From Chauvin living in North Carolina
Ben's nana wrote:
I was in Mackninaw and attempted my first Milky Way shot. There was some of light pollution on the horizon, but I kind of like it. RoKinon lens: f 4.0, ISO 2500, 30 sec. Please comment on what do do better
Thanks
Fran
Thanks
Fran
Jul 15, 2019 06:44:29 #
No one yet has said "Excellent photo, too bad there was a cloud in the middle" 
Jul 15, 2019 07:24:15 #
If it is your first try to astrophotography I would say you did well. You can use flash or a flashlight (ideally LED) to illuminate objects in the foreground if so you desire. I have done it in the past with great results.
Check out The Dynamics of Photographic Lighting section of our forum.
Jul 15, 2019 07:51:52 #
Jul 15, 2019 10:41:02 #
Ben's nana wrote:
Thanks Longshadow,
I do have the capacity for a F2.8 on my lens. As to the shoreline lights, I have a maybe dumb question....If I'm supposed to focus on Jupiter, shouldn't I expect the shore lights to be a little soft? Which lens do you use?
Fran
I do have the capacity for a F2.8 on my lens. As to the shoreline lights, I have a maybe dumb question....If I'm supposed to focus on Jupiter, shouldn't I expect the shore lights to be a little soft? Which lens do you use?
Fran
With your wide angle lens, for all practical purposes, the shore line lights are at the same focus point (distance) as the stars. With any long exposure, any shake or vibration can blur you exposure. Example: the mirror slapping closed will induce blur in a long exposure. The act of tripping the shutter can cause blur. Don't get too concerned about soft lights on the shoreline. Water vapor in the air as well as temperature diffraction can cause softness and there is nothing you can do about it. This bluring is most noticeable in the heat of the day. see examples, the elk are about a 1.5 miles away.
Zeiss 80mm 1/500
Zeiss 210mm 1/400
Jul 15, 2019 11:18:25 #
Ben's nana wrote:
Thanks Longshadow,
I do have the capacity for a F2.8 on my lens. As to the shoreline lights, I have a maybe dumb question....If I'm supposed to focus on Jupiter, shouldn't I expect the shore lights to be a little soft? Which lens do you use?
Fran
I do have the capacity for a F2.8 on my lens. As to the shoreline lights, I have a maybe dumb question....If I'm supposed to focus on Jupiter, shouldn't I expect the shore lights to be a little soft? Which lens do you use?
Fran
I think maybe ORpilot nails this pretty well and on s cond look your stars do seem pretty sharp.
So far I’ve been using an older sigma 30mm f1.4 and Minolta 50mm f1.4.
I just bought a Rokinon 35mm f1.4 but haven’t had it out at night yet
Hopefully at the next new moon I can get to the UP and try.
FWIW I was shooting in Ludington state park and got light pollution from Wisconsin on my horizons.
Jul 15, 2019 11:38:24 #
I down loaded and blew up your photo. Looks like the lens you used has a bit of Chromatic aberration at the edges of the top. I know my old Minolta and Canon 50mm F1.4 lenses had it too. This error makes points of light look like flying saucers instead of round. Their also seems to be some left-right movement blur. No telling where this came from. Wind, shutter, mirror, who knows. I usually shoot several shots of the same image just because stuff happens. Like the camera strap waving in the wind or a big truck just drove by and shook the tripod. Or I shifted from horizontal to vertical and bumpted the focus. As Forest Gump said, "shit happens" But sill, great shot. Get that cup of hot chocolate out and do some more night shots. I wonder what the Mackninaw Bridge looks like with the MilkyWay over it? Digital wasn't around when I was in the AirForce and stationed up in the UP.
Check out Professional and Advanced Portraiture section of our forum.
Jul 15, 2019 15:15:53 #
jayluber
Loc: Phoenix, AZ
I don't really see this as a focus issue. When I use my Rokinon 14mm for MW photos I use f2.8, 20, 25, or 30 second exp (30 is a bit long as it leads to star trails) and ISO of 4,000 - 12,000 depending on the foreground and exposure length. You might also want to get an interesting foreground as well.
Then the photo needs to be processed to bring out the MW. You didn't say - but I hope you're shooting in RAW.
Lots of MW processing videos on internet - just be careful of workflow to keep noise to min.
Great start - but just acknowledge its a learning process.
Where did you take photo???
Then the photo needs to be processed to bring out the MW. You didn't say - but I hope you're shooting in RAW.
Lots of MW processing videos on internet - just be careful of workflow to keep noise to min.
Great start - but just acknowledge its a learning process.
Where did you take photo???
Jul 15, 2019 15:45:55 #
jayluber wrote:
I don't really see this as a focus issue. When I ... (show quote)
Nice light painting.
Jul 15, 2019 22:09:06 #
Jul 15, 2019 22:16:19 #
In this case I would crop off the bush at the bottom (takes away focus from the sky in this case) and maybe take a little off the top for balance. Try it on a copy of the picture and let me know what you think.
Jul 19, 2019 09:47:27 #
Shootist wrote:
Really good first try! Just a few suggestions. Use... (show quote)
Shootist, I used a Nikon D750. Thanks so much shootist for all the tips and the encourgement.
Jul 19, 2019 09:48:44 #
CLF wrote:
Fran, looks good to me but I am no expert at taking this type of photo.
Greg
Greg
Greg, thanks for the compliment and the thumbs up
Fran
Jul 19, 2019 09:49:42 #
Jul 19, 2019 09:50:43 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Infrared Photography section of our forum.