Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
Thoughts to Live By
Page <<first <prev 3 of 5 next> last>>
Jul 3, 2019 12:38:00   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
Sorry, just jumped in and made my comment without reading your follow up.
--Bob

Reply
Jul 3, 2019 12:40:00   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
rmalarz wrote:
Was he the founding member of "Booker T. & the M.G.'s" Probably not, but what coincidence.
--Bob

(I wanted so much to say that!!! )
I love "Green Onions" and "Time is Tight"!

Reply
Jul 3, 2019 13:04:23   #
Kmgw9v Loc: Miami, Florida
 
jerryc41 wrote:
Well, someone mentioned Booker T. Washington, and you came back with peanut butter.


Jerry, re-read the post. My comment was a joke AFTER someone stated that “Mr Carver” was a brainy guy.
I at no time time confused the two men.
No disrespect intended, but Carver, not Booker, invented peanut butter. Apparently, the joke was not understood, by those who were confused by the name Washington.

As to the current political reference, Booker T. Washington’s quote was about the power of truth; he would not have respected a con-man who relies on lies to empower and maintain a political base.

Reply
 
 
Jul 3, 2019 13:43:55   #
rick_n_wv Loc: Charleston WV
 
Kmgw9v wrote:
The epitome of irony: Trump supporters embracing the words of Booker T. Washington.
Bizarro World.


Actually quite the opposite if you study history at all.

Reply
Jul 3, 2019 13:45:08   #
Kmgw9v Loc: Miami, Florida
 
Tex-s wrote:
I'll not insult you by suggesting your pithy comment had no merit, but Trump is hardly the problem. He is the symptom of the problem. The left are denying basic truths and basic Constitutional rights.

Trump is a falsehood machine, no doubt, but the other side of the debate is trying to eliminate gender. GENDER! Male and female exist and are not the same. (If they are interchangeable, there cannot be a women's movement, women's rights, or a wage gap.) We already have biological males dominating women's high school sports. Can YOU think of a better way to truly oppress women than to allow men into their sports?

The left are also trying to eliminate debate. As a short list of evidence I provide the Portland attack against Andy Ngo, the Berkeley riots on campus that caused a couple million in damage just because a conservative (Ben Shapiro) was going to speak on campus, and the recent leaks of information about the tech giants manipulating their services to hide, restrict, demonetize, and falsely label users and content.

The left want to eliminate free speech. So-called microaggressions, mandated pronouns, 'safe spaces', 'free speech zones'....... All of it is slowly chipping away at actual vocal speech freedoms.

The left are working to eliminate borders as well, at least by their own words in the debates.

I can hardly think of a founding principle liberty of the individual the left defend these days.
Speech? Only if you agree.
Press? Not if they disagree.
Religion? You joking?
Assembly? Not if you disagree. See Portland, Berkeley, Fourth of July celebrations....
Petition? Absolutely, via the Courts, trying to eliminate the others.
Gun ownership? Haaaaaaaahahahaha.
Quartering? Irrelevant, at least thus far.
Search and seizures?
Trial of peers?
Bail rules? The left's taxation demands seem fully unreasonable to me, but this is criminal law process, so I'll say the left still respect these, though these are not positive rights of the individual to DO, but restrictions on what can be done to...
Amendment 10: Clearly assigning anything not enumerated to the Feds as a State responsibility or an Individual right? No chance in hell, overall.
Amendment 9: The umbrella that covers every liberal/leftist argument, rational or not. Rights of the people are not necessarily limited to the list provided previously. The left have used this to eliminate the 10th Amendment. The SCOTUS actually has eliminated the 10th Amendment: "the Court held in United States v. Darby (1941) that the Tenth Amendment was merely a "truism," i.e. could be entirely ignored. It has been ever since."

In short, in my views, Trump is not THE problem, he's A problem, and all of the 76000 Democrat candidates are running to re-start THE problem.
I'll not insult you by suggesting your pithy comme... (show quote)


I agree that Trump is not THE problem, and that he is A problem.
The country is drifting badly, in many respects, for many reasons.
At this time, while I am liberal, am not impressed that either party can or will right the rudder.
I absolutely believe that Trump has no answers, and is totally ill-suited for the job that he holds.

Reply
Jul 3, 2019 13:47:20   #
Kmgw9v Loc: Miami, Florida
 
rick_n_wv wrote:
Actually quite the opposite if you study history at all.


What history do you refer to?
The quote from Booker is about truth—truth will always out, no matter how lies are twisted and repeated will they become truth.
I referred only to Trump—a man who knows no truth, has no respect for truth, and uses it only when it is convenient for his immediate needs. Trump sees no power in truth, he does and says what he can get away with for his personal impulsive needs. Truth is a problem for Trump, not an aspiration.
That is a far cry from the meaning of Booker’s quote; and therein lies the root of my comment about irony.

Reply
Jul 3, 2019 14:40:39   #
IDguy Loc: Idaho
 
jerryc41 wrote:
True, but if something is repeated often enough by enough people, it is accepted as the truth.


Indeed. Look at those misguided souls who, wanting to protect their children, didn’t have them vaccinated. They have injured and killed thousands, in some cases their own children. They should be charged with child abuse.

As an extra, note how all the publisized statements by those who actually know vacinnations do not cause autism are ignored by those who have accepted the BS. It becomes a religious belief thing (not even addressing the cases where actual religion contributes to the delusions).

Reply
 
 
Jul 3, 2019 14:46:13   #
IDguy Loc: Idaho
 
Kmgw9v wrote:
What history do you refer to?
The quote from Booker is about truth—truth will always out, no matter how lies are twisted and repeated will they become truth.
I referred only to Trump—a man who knows no truth, has no respect for truth, and uses it only when it is convenient for his immediate needs. Trump sees no power in truth, he does and says what he can get away with for his personal impulsive needs. Truth is a problem for Trump, not an aspiration.
That is a far cry from the meaning of Booker’s quote; and therein lies the root of my comment about irony.
What history do you refer to? br The quote from Bo... (show quote)


Sorry, but truth most certainly does not “always out” in politics, media, and other venues. My condolences to those who actually believe that.

Wonder what you think about all the congresspeople who cause the border problems by not fixing the law or funding what is needed to fix the problems they are causing, and blaming the conservatives who are actually working their hearts out to solve the mess?

Reply
Jul 3, 2019 15:21:33   #
raymondh Loc: Walker, MI
 
alx wrote:



Reply
Jul 3, 2019 15:51:33   #
Kmgw9v Loc: Miami, Florida
 
IDguy wrote:
Sorry, but truth most certainly does not “always out” in politics, media, and other venues. My condolences to those who actually believe that.

Wonder what you think about all the congresspeople who cause the border problems by not fixing the law or funding what is needed to fix the problems they are causing, and blaming the conservatives who are actually working their hearts out to solve the mess?


Sorry, but try to follow: The thread is about a quote---Booker T. Washington was talking about lies becoming truths through repetition and acceptance, evil will always be evil, never good, wrong will never be right; even if accepted by a majority. Booker is the man whose "Thoughts to live By" quote is the subject.

i didn't say it, nor do I believe it is always true. When I said the truth will always "out", I was trying explain the meaning of the quote; not giving my personal views about the world. I know the world is full of accepted lies---especially in politics. Moreso today, more than I have ever seen. Review the misinformation we see everyday on this forum.
The irony is that Booker was articulating a thought about the power, the resilience of truth and good, right over wrong; when we all know Trump relies on less than the truth everyday to solidify his base. That, like I said, is a far cry from the meaning of the quote, made by Booker, not me; and the subject of the thread. That is extreme irony--the idea that his supporters accept the quote as "Thoughts to Live By" in spite of their love for Trump.
I don't mean to insult, but by your comment, this entire discussion has gone over your ability to follow logical argument. READ the quote, and decide if you believe it, and then ask yourself if it applies to Trump, or should. Truth is sometimes hard to find--and Booker knew that. The irony, try to understand, is that Trump is not looking for, or relying on truth to make his bones. Speaking the Truth for Trump is a problem, an obstacle, much like a Congressional oversight committee. Again, the quote is about men like Trump, and their twisted approach to right and wrong.

Good Lord, I could use a Scotch about now.

Reply
Jul 3, 2019 16:07:36   #
alx Loc: NJ
 
Kmgw9v wrote:
Good Lord, I could use a Scotch about now.

A bourbon for me, but you are sure right.

Reply
 
 
Jul 3, 2019 21:45:16   #
SangerM
 
IDguy wrote:
Wonder what you think about all the congresspeople who cause the border problems by not fixing the law or funding what is needed to fix the problems they are causing, and blaming the conservatives who are actually working their hearts out to solve the mess?


With all sincere respect, I must say that the above is confused, specious, or just plain wrong. For example, no one in congress is working his or her 'heart out' to 'solve the mess.' People are pointing fingers and making claims and otherwise doing their best to score points against their political opponents, but there's no real effort being made by anyone who matters to fix the immigration problem along our southern border (which by the way, has been almost entirely self-inflicted--though you need to have facts to know this, trust me). If they were, the problem would be fixed. It's not that hard, really, if you're willing to think outside boxes and biases.

Sadly, the know-nothings in America are too focused on tried & true medieval methods of stopping invaders (walls, moats, cages, starvation, family separations, etc.) to understand or really care that there are global pressures on LATAM populations that have been building for more than a century that we've turned a blind eye to while we focused on what some bright-wit recently rediscovered and is calling great-power competition. We've allowed corrupt regimes to sprout and fester from top to bottom of the hemisphere, and we've supported some against others to the slow destruction of whole economies or their abandonment to the ravages of crime and revolution--all okay with us, so long as people stayed in their little crap-holes and kept giving us their mineral resources and their low-wage labor (when we needed it, as during WWII).

What's interesting is that NAFTA, which was derided as worthless and damaging to American laborers, was actually aimed at reducing the need for people to come to the U.S. to work. The idea was that the border area would be a stopping place where migrants could work and earn enough to send remittances south and so would not need to cross the border. And it was working. By 2010, the flow had decreased and the area was prospering, but the economic downturn of this century wreaked havoc all over and people from the south again starting looking here for work. And of course, in our twittering-idiot country, we forgot the reason for NAFTA, ignored the cause of the resurgence, declared NAFTA a failure, and all the immigrants evil, awful people. Yeah. People who were willing to risk their lives to work long hours at terrible jobs so they could send half or more of what they earn back to needy families (for some poorer countries, inbound remittances exceed their GDP).

I could go on and on, but I'll stop wth these several thoughts. Immigration and its long term effects on America are something I know more than a little about--starting around 1850, when we first asked in the census where people were born. Simply put, all immigration has been beneficial to America (yes, even illegal immigration), in spite of social upheaval, war, the great migrations, and all the rest. More important: immigration is absolutely crucial to the future of our country--we stem the tide at our peril.

Why? Because replacement birthrates matter. The U.S. has a healthy, growing economy for two reasons: We ruthlessly seek and implement efficiencies like no other country (we're all about a Dollar, after all), and we have more babies than we do dying people. The latter reason is the more important, and the only reason that's true is because of our immigrant population. As in most industrialized nations, Americans stopped making enough babies to prosper a couple decades ago, but immigrants bring with them lots of babies and often a culture and religion that encourages making more babies. This is the main reason America is prosperous, and all the other industrialized nations are facing economic stress. Consider why leadership in Germany was so eager to accept immigrants in the face of populist resistance. Merkel understood Germany doesn't make enough babies. They never recovered from the losses of WWII and progress. Russia, in fact, is a doomed country because it cannot make enough babies--and Putin knows it. Why do you think he's so hard over about places where there are lots of ethnic Russians? America needs its immigrants and their new blood if we want to keep our economic position in the world. If we become truly isolationist and manage to turn away all the immigrants, we will be as doomed as Russia.

And you needn't take my word for any of this. The data is available via google, more than its possible to digest. You just have to be willing to form your own opinions instead of uncritcally accepting what people of questionable intent are telling you.

The simple truth is this: What most people think they know about immigration is really just wrong, and the people screaming loudest about world-ending tides of evil immigrant hordes are just using a millenia-old method of rallying a terrified and ignorant populace to the cause. Barbarians are at the gates! Fire! Flood! Doom, despair, agony, deep dark depression, excessive misery!* The real truth is that our nation has room and to spare for a lot more people than we have. Moreover, we are God Blessed enough to be a nation of generally decent people who, when we bother to recall it and admit it, know that there but for the grace, etc., is us. We could fix this easy if we could ever all decide we really want to.

Regards
SangerM


P.S. BY the way, it may be interesting to some to know that in 2006, the 2nd largest number of illegal immigrants in the U.S. were people who came here on vistor visas and didn't leave when they were supposed to. I think that's still true today.

P.P.S. Often when illegal immigrants are caught breaking the law, it's because they are doing things we won't allow them to do legally, like driving without a license and insurance, or running a small business without permits, etc. We also don't encourage using banks and such, so they carry cash and become victims of crime, and they can't rent places to live so they end up squatters... and on and on. Yes, I know. If they didn't come here without permission they wouldn't have these problems, but consider how much of what makes them criminals is just bureacratic BS and wouldn't be a problem if we decided we didn't want it to be. It really can be that simple, which is why I wrote that no one is really working all that hard to solve the problems. It doesn't make good politics to solve a problem you can blame on the opposition and gets you votes. Princes don't fix things that keep people looking other than at them, and in America today, the GOP doesn't want its constituency to start asking where the emperor's brains are.

'nuff said.


* Yes, I remember that well. heh.

Reply
Jul 3, 2019 22:24:58   #
Timmers Loc: San Antonio Texas.
 
Now guys you want to avoid that George Washington Carver guy, he is a big trouble maker.

For an excellent introduction to George Washington Carver get a copy of The Secret Life of Plants.

But, be warned, you will never be able to look at the world with the same eyes.

Reply
Jul 3, 2019 22:27:03   #
StanMac Loc: Tennessee
 
Kmgw9v wrote:
No, i am not.
Jerry, give me a break
Booker T. Washington and George Washington Carver were not alike, except for being visionaries- and black.
One believed in advancing business and educational opportunities for black Americans; the other was a botanist who advanced the peanut- a black American agricultural scientist and inventor. The peanut butter reference was a joke because Carver invented it, and the two men should not be confused

I am not confused.
I find it ironic that those who excuse Trump’s con-artistry would embrace a visionary like Booker T.
No, i am not. br Jerry, give me a break br Book... (show quote)


👍👍
Ironic in the extreme.

Stan

Reply
Jul 3, 2019 22:41:29   #
StanMac Loc: Tennessee
 
Thank you, SangerM.

Stan

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.