Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Macro Lens Vs. Adapter ring for a 50mm lens
Page <prev 2 of 2
Sep 4, 2012 18:28:37   #
twowindsbear
 
Can you possibly borrow, or even rent, a good set of extension tubes, and a reversing ring, to see if they'll work for you?

Good luck with your photos.

Reply
Sep 5, 2012 00:03:57   #
allen finley photography Loc: Sunshine State.
 
Nikonian72 wrote:
kristinelogan wrote:
I guess I am wondering if anyone thinks such images can be gained with a reversal ring or if the macro lens is the only way to go.
The two images you have posted are close-ups, not macros. They can be captured with a macro lens, which also focus so close that just a baby's finger or two are in picture. At Minimum Focusing Distance, a U.S. Quarter fills your viewfinder edge-to-edge.

I suggest a set of Auto-extension tubes to be used with your prime 50-mm. You can experiment with single tubes, or combo of tubes to arrive at the "closeness" that you want to achieve. Auto tubes preserve your auto-focus and auto-aperture features of your Canon lens.

Kenko manufactures excellent auto-extension tubes for Canon mount. Here are my Kenkos for Nikon mount.
quote=kristinelogan I guess I am wondering if any... (show quote)


Totally agree, an extension tube set is the way to go. Will work with getting closer shots. I use them for wedding ring and cake decoration shots with my 50 1.8 and get super sharp results. Make sure you get a set that has an autofocus confirm chip and will operate EF lenses. Some only work with EF-S lenses.

Reply
Sep 5, 2012 08:04:30   #
kristinelogan Loc: Indiana
 
twowindsbear wrote:
Can you possibly borrow, or even rent, a good set of extension tubes, and a reversing ring, to see if they'll work for you?

Good luck with your photos.


Great idea, but sadly those in my immediate circle use macros. I do have a newborn photog friend out of town who is going to try the reversing ring and let me know how it works for. So while she is ordering hers, I am tapping the Hogs for their experiences. ;-)

Reply
 
 
Sep 10, 2012 10:32:47   #
kristinelogan Loc: Indiana
 
Nikonian72 wrote:
kristinelogan wrote:
I guess I am wondering if anyone thinks such images can be gained with a reversal ring or if the macro lens is the only way to go.
The two images you have posted are close-ups, not macros. They can be captured with a macro lens, which also focus so close that just a baby's finger or two are in picture. At Minimum Focusing Distance, a U.S. Quarter fills your viewfinder edge-to-edge.

I suggest a set of Auto-extension tubes to be used with your prime 50-mm. You can experiment with single tubes, or combo of tubes to arrive at the "closeness" that you want to achieve. Auto tubes preserve your auto-focus and auto-aperture features of your Canon lens.

Kenko manufactures excellent auto-extension tubes for Canon mount. Here are my Kenkos for Nikon mount.
quote=kristinelogan I guess I am wondering if any... (show quote)


Thank you so much for your suggestion here. This is certainly worth considering. I am a total newbie to the macro world and appreciate you helping me "see" the difference between close up and macro. You have me thinking..... ;-)

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.