Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Depth of Field: In focus or not?
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Jun 17, 2019 13:35:38   #
R.G. Loc: Scotland
 
Nobody seems to have mentioned that autofocus tends to lock on to the nearest high contrast edges - which in this case was probably the tip of the bud. If it had been on the bee there wold probably have been enough DOF to include the whole bee.

Reply
Jun 17, 2019 15:39:24   #
carl hervol Loc: jacksonville florida
 
I think the man needs glasses looks sharp to me.

Reply
Jun 17, 2019 16:42:45   #
jackpinoh Loc: Kettering, OH 45419
 
shamann wrote:
I took this photo of a mason bee on our oleander plant about 10 years ago. I was using an older camera (Nikon D300) at the time. I've been told by a stock photography site that the main subject is not in focus and it was rejected. I used an f stop of around f/5.6, and because of the narrow depth of field and the angle I took the shot, the bud in the "foreground" is in sharp focus. But it appears to me the bee is also within that same plane (at least part of it is). I'm concerned that my eyesight is getting worse and/or my lens doesn't focus properly. I believe it was auto-focused. Has anyone else had any similar issues and do you have any suggestions?
Thanks in advance!
I took this photo of a mason bee on our oleander p... (show quote)

At the distance, focal length, and aperture you used, the depth of field was probably less than 1mm.

Reply
 
 
Jun 17, 2019 17:13:23   #
DeanS Loc: Capital City area of North Carolina
 
Perhaps in a lab this shot might fail an indepth, critical review. As one that you might print and place in an album, it looks good to me.

Reply
Jun 17, 2019 17:39:17   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
shamann wrote:
I took this photo of a mason bee on our oleander plant about 10 years ago. I was using an older camera (Nikon D300) at the time. I've been told by a stock photography site that the main subject is not in focus and it was rejected. I used an f stop of around f/5.6, and because of the narrow depth of field and the angle I took the shot, the bud in the "foreground" is in sharp focus. But it appears to me the bee is also within that same plane (at least part of it is). I'm concerned that my eyesight is getting worse and/or my lens doesn't focus properly. I believe it was auto-focused. Has anyone else had any similar issues and do you have any suggestions?
Thanks in advance!
I took this photo of a mason bee on our oleander p... (show quote)


Only a razor thin plane in the middle of the insect is sharp. f/11 might have been better, although that’s starting to risk diffraction.

Reply
Jun 17, 2019 19:58:54   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
shamann wrote:
I took this photo of a mason bee on our oleander plant about 10 years ago. I was using an older camera (Nikon D300) at the time. I've been told by a stock photography site that the main subject is not in focus and it was rejected. I used an f stop of around f/5.6, and because of the narrow depth of field and the angle I took the shot, the bud in the "foreground" is in sharp focus. But it appears to me the bee is also within that same plane (at least part of it is). I'm concerned that my eyesight is getting worse and/or my lens doesn't focus properly. I believe it was auto-focused. Has anyone else had any similar issues and do you have any suggestions?
Thanks in advance!
I took this photo of a mason bee on our oleander p... (show quote)


The main subject , the Bee IS in focus - but only a small sliver down the middle of the back ! The narrow DOF is the real reason for rejection. This type of shot needs to be at f11 or smaller !.
.

Reply
Jun 18, 2019 03:24:07   #
bertloomis Loc: Fort Worth, Texas
 
I think it is a wonderful photo!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.