Nobody seems to have mentioned that autofocus tends to lock on to the nearest high contrast edges - which in this case was probably the tip of the bud. If it had been on the bee there wold probably have been enough DOF to include the whole bee.
I think the man needs glasses looks sharp to me.
shamann wrote:
I took this photo of a mason bee on our oleander plant about 10 years ago. I was using an older camera (Nikon D300) at the time. I've been told by a stock photography site that the main subject is not in focus and it was rejected. I used an f stop of around f/5.6, and because of the narrow depth of field and the angle I took the shot, the bud in the "foreground" is in sharp focus. But it appears to me the bee is also within that same plane (at least part of it is). I'm concerned that my eyesight is getting worse and/or my lens doesn't focus properly. I believe it was auto-focused. Has anyone else had any similar issues and do you have any suggestions?
Thanks in advance!
I took this photo of a mason bee on our oleander p... (
show quote)
At the distance, focal length, and aperture you used, the depth of field was probably less than 1mm.
DeanS
Loc: Capital City area of North Carolina
Perhaps in a lab this shot might fail an indepth, critical review. As one that you might print and place in an album, it looks good to me.
shamann wrote:
I took this photo of a mason bee on our oleander plant about 10 years ago. I was using an older camera (Nikon D300) at the time. I've been told by a stock photography site that the main subject is not in focus and it was rejected. I used an f stop of around f/5.6, and because of the narrow depth of field and the angle I took the shot, the bud in the "foreground" is in sharp focus. But it appears to me the bee is also within that same plane (at least part of it is). I'm concerned that my eyesight is getting worse and/or my lens doesn't focus properly. I believe it was auto-focused. Has anyone else had any similar issues and do you have any suggestions?
Thanks in advance!
I took this photo of a mason bee on our oleander p... (
show quote)
Only a razor thin plane in the middle of the insect is sharp. f/11 might have been better, although that’s starting to risk diffraction.
shamann wrote:
I took this photo of a mason bee on our oleander plant about 10 years ago. I was using an older camera (Nikon D300) at the time. I've been told by a stock photography site that the main subject is not in focus and it was rejected. I used an f stop of around f/5.6, and because of the narrow depth of field and the angle I took the shot, the bud in the "foreground" is in sharp focus. But it appears to me the bee is also within that same plane (at least part of it is). I'm concerned that my eyesight is getting worse and/or my lens doesn't focus properly. I believe it was auto-focused. Has anyone else had any similar issues and do you have any suggestions?
Thanks in advance!
I took this photo of a mason bee on our oleander p... (
show quote)
The main subject , the Bee IS in focus - but only a small sliver down the middle of the back ! The narrow DOF is the real reason for rejection. This type of shot needs to be at f11 or smaller !.
.
I think it is a wonderful photo!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.