Lainey, I wouldn't expect you to understand but I'll try. When Bush was President, I disagreed with some of his policies but respected the fact that he was basically honest and had the best interest of the country in mind.
When Reagan was President, I also disagreed with policies but respected that he had the best interest of the country in mind.
Now Trump is President and it's not about his policies. I still disagree with some of them and I actually do agree with others but my real problem with Trump is that by his actions and his words he's shown that he doesn't have the best interest of this country in mind.
He's sided with despots and dictators and publicly defends Putin and Kim, taking the side of these despots and disrespecting our own intelligence agencies.
Now he wants to pardon war criminals, who were turned in by their own men for the atrocious crimes they committed..\
He's turned the Presidency into a cash cow in violation of the Constitution and defies legally issued subpoenas to prevent his misfeasance and malfeasance from being investigated.
He's appointed an Attorney General who doesn't understand that he's the people's attorney, not the personal attorney of Donald Trump.
So if you, in your conscience, in the privacy of your home can square the fact that you've got a criminal in the Oval Office, but you're okay with it because the economy is doing well then that is a sad fact about you.
BTW, if you can take a moment away from Sean Hannity, you might want to take a look at the economic growth of the United States and look at the graphs that will point out to you that much of the growth was started under the Obama administration.
You might also want to figure out that all those new "tariffs" are actually taxes that he's levying against you, the consumer, or do you really believe that when a company has to pay a tariff, they're not going to charge you for it.
I'd take the time to explain economics to you, but most of your posts seem to be attacking me. I guess I scare you as much as AOC does.
Blessed be.

Not butthurt and definitely not a Fake War Hero.
Hey wait. I've got an idea. Why don't you, Louise and the rest of you actually try to take part in an intelligent conversation instead of obsessing about me?
I'd probably disagree with your position but at leaast, it would be closer to having a conversation than a group of schoolyard bullies trying to hurt me.
BTW, you really can't hurt me because I'd actually have to care about you to care what you think.
Just thought a real conversation would be more interesting than your boring bs.

I wholly disagree with this statement, the first 10 amendments, those you reference as to being passed in 1791 severely limited the federal government's reach by outlining personal freedoms and incorporating individual rights in our country's constitution, very few subsequent amendments broadened federal powers, what has done a great deal of damage to our constitution by broadening the scope of federal power to "meet the needs of our society" is the SCOTUS to which the other two branches have no effective check on the power it exercises over our constitution which by the way was never granted to the courts by our constitution, nowhere in the constitution will you find constitutional authorization of judicial review.

Elaine, the point of my question was to provide a forum for different viewpoints to be discussed. It succeeded in that there are a number of differing opinions well expressed. Your posts could never be considered enlightening because all ever do is insult someone like a schoolyard trollop or put an emoji indicating your approval. It’s lame.

While I disagree with BigBear, LWW, and EyeSawYou among others to a lesser extent, they did post reasoned responses. Unlike your posts in which you attempt to cleverly insult someone who argues against trump. All you do is fail, virtually every time... just like now.
You totally missed the point, issued yet another childish insult and look foolish in the process. Nice going.