Some guy can draw really nice.
Fotoartist wrote:
Some guy can draw really nice.
Agreed. Those are classy, understated, elegant tattoos.
No doubt about it, the young-uns love tats. And they look great on firm, smooth flesh. But.... Anyway, not a moral issue, but I do agree with the posts here that tats limit a model's options. Lovely girl and nice pix!
I lost out on several submissions for Playboy centerfolds, back when it could mean several hundred grand to the girl. One girl, against my advice, got a huge small of back tatt. PB's guy ret'd the photos (this was before digital) and told me they'd have brought her in if not for the ink work.
The second girl had decided that her kitty would be prettier if closely flanked by a pair of butterflies. That girl had such a strong look that PB did a test shoot anyhow, but the tatts cost her the centerfold.
I remember doing a headshot shoot of identical twin male models. One was heavily inked and told me he got far fewer gigs than his non-inked brother.
NoSocks
Loc: quonochontaug, rhode island
I don’t understand “moves threads”. What does that mean?
JohnFrim
Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
NoSocks wrote:
I don’t understand “moves threads”. What does that mean?
When someone posts a comment on the forum and others add their posts/comments it becomes a thread. Sometimes Admin thinks the thread contains information that is not appropriate for a particular section and "moves the thread" to a new section.
In this case I suspect the original photos were posted elsewhere and admin felt there was too much "skin" showing, so moved it to the nudie section.
Sometimes Admin deletes individual posts or entire threads if they get out of hand.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.