Trump claims entire Mueller Report covered by Executive Priveledge.
Everyone investigating him hated him, and they had 34 million dollars to use in their investigation. Sorry Charlie, nothing there.
Vietnam Vet wrote:
Everyone investigating him hated him, and they had 34 million dollars to use in their investigation. Sorry Charlie, nothing there.
Mueller enriched the teams Hildabeast donors with tax payers money. They’ll donate some back. And the cycle resumes.
That explains their many field trips and special excursions to DC brothels to do urine research in bed.
For those who support Trump not letting anyone see it what is the rationale?
Rose42 wrote:
For those who support Trump not letting anyone see it what is the rationale?
Indeed! Why all the huffing and puffing about this magnificent rehabilitation of John Barron aka Babylon?
Rose42 wrote:
For those who support Trump not letting anyone see it what is the rationale?
You have never been informed a far less redacted doc remains for congress to read.
Only a couple republicans read it. Lefties don’t wanna read it. They’d rather keep the hoax alive.
The Russian script sure works on them. Useful idiots, lefties are.
Angmo wrote:
You have never been informed a far less redacted doc remains for congress to read.
Only a couple republicans read it. Lefties don’t wanna read it. They’d rather keep the hoax alive.
The Russian script sure works on them. Useful idiots, lefties are.
Just a note but Russia supported trump. You supported Trump. You and Russia are comrades.
Frank T wrote:
Just a note but Russia supported trump. You supported Trump. You and Russia are comrades.
"Unfair late night comedy shows? My pal Vlad locks 'em up or murders 'em! I not allowed to do that yet!"
... gasp for air ... two handed sip of water ... bronzer top up ...
... "When he had that Pussy Riot I told him ..." I grab 'em like a bowling balls and tie their knits in a knot!"
Frank T wrote:
Except that's not what the report said.
Too bad, you can't read and really unfortunate that you don't respect the Constitution.
Why don't YOU tell us what YOU think the report said. Quote chapter and verse so we can see what you are lying about.
What about this and the Constitution has your knickers in a knot?
Elaine2025 wrote:
No, the country has not lost. You will never see an economy like this under a democrat. There are jobs now, the same jobs that obummer said were gone for good. Walk away from dems that want to stifle growth and the economy while politicians get richer. Dems want to keep people needy and in the grasp of government control.
Come Friday with the increase on the China Tariffs from 10% to 25%, you can start to see a good number of those allegedly "trump created" jobs starting to fizzle away when manufacturers begin to realize that those price increases that they've been eating will have to be passed on to the consumer.
It's likely that consumers will put off unnecessary purchases until after the tariffs are lifted, or until trump is out of office on January 20, 2021, whichever comes first.
US manufacturers are going to have to find alternative sources for the raw materials or parts that they use in their finished goods, and stop being so dependent on cheep labor in China.
Cykdelic wrote:
I believe the report by the independent counsel who said there was no collusion or conspiracy, period.
Too bad the fascist progressives can’t accept the reality they asked, and paid, for.
You're grasping at Barr's interpretation of the report.
But there was evidence of both conspiring with the Russians and Obstruction of Justice.
Mueller and his team documented over 200 interactions between the trump campaign and Russian Olegarchs or Russian Government operatives.
There are 11 incidents of Obstruction by or at the instruction of trump in the Mueller Report.
Since the redacted Mueller Report was released, there have been dozens of additional Obstruction of Justice incidents by trump, Barr, the DOJ, the IRS, the Treasury, and the White House. By tomorrow it's likely that Don Jr. will also be obstructing Congress, after he was issued a subpoena to come back and testify before Congress again.
trump was humiliated after the New York Times released their report about trump's taxes from 1985 to 1994.
Angmo wrote:
You have never been informed a far less redacted doc remains for congress to read.
Only a couple republicans read it. Lefties don’t wanna read it. They’d rather keep the hoax alive.
The Russian script sure works on them. Useful idiots, lefties are.
Did you read what the restrictions are for that "less redacted" version are?
Only a small number of members of Congressional are authorized to view that document.
No staffers can view the document.
No one can take notes and remove their notes from the viewing room.
No one can discuss what they read in that less redacted document with anyone else.
That means that any information that the less redacted document contains is useless to anyone who views it!
So it's no wonder that no Democrats have viewed that less redacted document.
Shutterbug1697 wrote:
Did you read what the restrictions are for that "less redacted" version are?
Only a small number of members of Congressional are authorized to view that document.
No staffers can view the document.
No one can take notes and remove their notes from the viewing room.
No one can discuss what they read in that less redacted document with anyone else.
That means that any information that the less redacted document contains is useless to anyone who views it!
So it's no wonder that no Democrats have viewed that less redacted document.
Did you read what the restrictions are for that &q... (
show quote)
So an actual congressman can come see it then. They don’t. Because they know it all a leftie farce.
Kmgw9v wrote:
The country has lost. The damage is irreparable for years to come, if ever.
ROTFLMAO seriously? Have you been in a coma for the last two+ years? This Country is flourishing under Trump and unemployment is at its lowest in decades, GDP over 3.0% first time in ober 10 years which Obama never achieved...I could go on and on, it you are blind to reality.
Frank T wrote:
Except that's not what the report said.
Too bad, you can't read and really unfortunate that you don't respect the Constitution.
Lol name ONE person that was indicted for colluding or conspiring with Russia.
Shutterbug1697 wrote:
Did you read what the restrictions are for that "less redacted" version are?
Only a small number of members of Congressional are authorized to view that document.
No staffers can view the document.
No one can take notes and remove their notes from the viewing room.
No one can discuss what they read in that less redacted document with anyone else.
That means that any information that the less redacted document contains is useless to anyone who views it!
So it's no wonder that no Democrats have viewed that less redacted document.
Did you read what the restrictions are for that &q... (
show quote)
Mueller participated in the redactions, check mate! You loony conspiracy nuts lost.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.