Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
taking a photo with Raw only vs Raw +jpeg
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
May 6, 2019 20:07:26   #
User ID
 
JBGLADSTONE wrote:

My question is, is there a better quality
by selecting Raw only vs Raw +jpeg or
jpeg only vs Raw+jpeg?


No.

Reply
May 6, 2019 23:17:21   #
JBGLADSTONE Loc: Oregon
 
User ID wrote:
No.


Thanks everyone for providing immediate answers. Including guidance/directions.

I just wanted to confirm that RAW vs Raw+jpeg or jpeg only were using the same data processing for each type of file.

Yes I do shoot mostly with both because I want to be able send photos immediately. I Use DPP4, PSE15+, and On1 Photo 10 (not ON1 RAW because my computer is very old with a slow video card). I normally will use DPP4 to convert all raw files to 16bit TIFF for post processing with ON1 Photo 10. ON1 is older and does not recognize my Canon 80D.

Reply
May 6, 2019 23:25:11   #
Photocraig
 
I shot RAW + JPEG until I realized I never opened the JPEG'S. Now it is RAW only. Less space, less time to write to the buffer. I never post pictures, even here. I cull ruthlessly and edit only keepers in LR.

Just me,
C

Reply
 
 
May 7, 2019 06:09:27   #
Kuzano
 
I think the answer to your question is very simple. I am inclined to think that a RAW plua Jpeg, produces the same RAW as a RAW shot alone. Your question is quite clear to me, and requires no other clarification.

Reply
May 7, 2019 06:19:47   #
catchlight.. Loc: Wisconsin USA- Halden Norway
 
mwsilvers wrote:
Only shoot raw if you are intending to post process all or most of you images. If you will rarely post process, stick with jpegs. If you export unedited raw images to jpegs, as a general rule they may look flater and duller with less sharpening or contrast compared to jpegs straight out the camera. The advantage of shooting raw only comes into play if you post process.

I shoot raw only. I edit every image I keep.
I export edited raw files to jpegs in my raw processor of choice, DXO Photolab Elite.
Only shoot raw if you are intending to post proces... (show quote)


Shooting RAW is best as you say, and will store all of the data for future editing... instead of a destructive compressed Jpeg, but...

setting the camera to shoot Raw + small jpeg, assigns a preview of the image that will allow easy identification any time, anywhere and on any device.

Reply
May 7, 2019 06:47:28   #
Cecil Webb
 
I shoot Raw & Jpeg because I use the Jpeg like the old contact sheet for editing & culling images with lesser impact because they load faster, anything I keep I process from RAW (old habits are hard to break).

Reply
May 7, 2019 07:07:33   #
Carusoswi
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
There's probably a deep question here in "is there a better quality" ....

Do you plan to edit your RAW files? What software are you planning to use?

Whether you shoot JPEG or RAW, how are you planning to use the resulting image files?


Not questioning your work flow if it works for you, but, if you installed a program like Irfanview, you could browse your RAW files, and Irfanview would show you your camera's in-bedded jpeg view from which you could click a keyboard shortcut to edit the RAW file in the editor of your choice.

This would save you having to shoot in RAW + JPEG.

I haven't tried it, but believe that Irfanview would convert your RAW to JPEG, either on a single file basis or a batch operation, so, if you wanted those JPEG files after the shoot, they are still available to you.

Caruso

Reply
 
 
May 7, 2019 07:15:53   #
ggenova64
 
I shot both RAW + JPEG. RAW is what's called an undestructive file (can't spell!) in other words it retains all the original data without damaging or making permanent changes to the file. On the other side JPEG losses it's files data every time changes are made.

Reply
May 7, 2019 07:35:07   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
I use RAW capture only.
--Bob
JBGLADSTONE wrote:
My question is, is there a better quality by selecting Raw only vs Raw +jpeg or jpeg only vs Raw+jpeg?

Reply
May 7, 2019 07:46:40   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
JBGLADSTONE wrote:
Thanks everyone for providing immediate answers. Including guidance/directions.

I just wanted to confirm that RAW vs Raw+jpeg or jpeg only were using the same data processing for each type of file.

Yes I do shoot mostly with both because I want to be able send photos immediately. I Use DPP4, PSE15+, and On1 Photo 10 (not ON1 RAW because my computer is very old with a slow video card). I normally will use DPP4 to convert all raw files to 16bit TIFF for post processing with ON1 Photo 10. ON1 is older and does not recognize my Canon 80D.
Thanks everyone for providing immediate answers. ... (show quote)


Yes, they are the 'same data' from the sensor. The RAW file is the the sensor data in an unprocessed form with the camera settings. The JPEG is the same RAW data with camera settings then processed by the camera. The DPP software recognizes the camera settings such as sharpening, picture style, white balance, noise processing, brightness, contrast, lens profile, etc, from the 80D. The Canon software can be used to modify and / or otherwise override these values. Converting to 16-bit TIFF is a appropriate method to transform the RAW file into a format the other software can operate on, although PSE can edit only 8-bit TIFFs.

Reply
May 7, 2019 07:48:48   #
berchman Loc: South Central PA
 
JBGLADSTONE wrote:
My question is, is there a better quality by selecting Raw only vs Raw +jpeg or jpeg only vs Raw+jpeg?


When I'm on a trip to an interesting place and I know that I will want to post a few photos in Facebook or send a few to friends, I shoot RAW + jpeg. My Fuji camera can send photos wirelessly to my iPhone where I can process them and mail them out. It can send only jpeg's because the RAW shots are too large. Fuji is known for the incredible quality of its jpegs. When I return from the trip I process the RAW photos in Lightroom and Photoshop.

Reply
 
 
May 7, 2019 08:30:26   #
bentvalve
 
Raw 95% of the time. When I go to a car show or go on a motorcycle run I save in both RAW and jpeg-Fine on 2 cards. Saves time when I post on the forums I frequent.

Bent

Reply
May 7, 2019 08:58:04   #
bike42 Loc: Boynton Beach Fl & Bridgewater, NJ
 
This summer I will be shooting a golf outing for a charity. I intend to shoot Raw & JPEG. I will download the JPG pictures from cartd number 2 (Nikon D500) to their computer, and they will show the pictures all during dinner. I will take the RAW pictures home, and post process them as necessary. They might send the RAW pictures out to the individual groups (I intend to take a picture of each group on the tee).

Reply
May 7, 2019 08:59:35   #
boydcrochet
 
mwsilvers wrote:
Only shoot raw if you are intending to post process all or most of you images. If you will rarely post process, stick with jpegs. If you export unedited raw images to jpegs, as a general rule they may look flater and duller with less sharpening or contrast compared to jpegs straight out the camera. The advantage of shooting raw only comes into play if you post process.

I shoot raw only. I edit every image I keep.
I export edited raw files to jpegs in my raw processor of choice, DXO Photolab Elite.
Only shoot raw if you are intending to post proces... (show quote)


You are experiencing an anomaly with your jpg engine. Either you are wrong, have really outdated software, or your current software is setup wrong.

Reply
May 7, 2019 09:18:01   #
gvarner Loc: Central Oregon Coast
 
I shoot RAW+JPEG because, at times, there are photos that I don’t intend to do much processing with. Yes, I can and do make that decision once in a while.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.