Jim Bianco wrote:
Do you use image stabilization when you use a monopod? Thanks Jim Bianco
Always.
I've been using various IS lenses for over 15 years and I hardly ever turn it off... some lenses I even have the switch taped over to prevent accidentally turning it off.
BEWARE getting advice about image stabilization... People with a different system than yours are likely to reply and their stabilization is probably different.
Each stabilization system.... Canon IS, Nikon VR, Sony OSS, Sigma OS, Tamron VC.... is patented by its manufacturer. Although the purpose of in-lens stabilization and general principles are the same, there are bound to be some difference in how they perform.
For example, a lot of people using Nikon VR tend to turn it off whenever they can because they feel it slows autofocus a bit.
Personally, using around a dozen different Canon IS lenses extensively over the years, I feel the opposite is true with them.... that, if anything, IS helps AF perform better. As a result, I see no reason to turn it off!
A few Canon IS lenses require it be turned off when used "on a tripod"... four discontinued models and one that's still in production (the EF 300mm f/4L IS USM). With these particular lenses, if they are locked down on a tripod (or used in any way that prevents any and all movement), the IS can go into sort of a feedback loop where it actually causes movement and "shake blur" in images. I've used several copies of two lens models with that type of IS. You can see the IS "freaking out" with rapid movements in your viewfinder (not to be confused with slower "image drift" that's common with all optical stabilization systems). The lenses of this type I had and still have lend themselves to hand held shooting... maybe a monopod with the 300mm.... so I've never had any problem leaving IS on.
All Canon manuals tell you to turn off IS when using the lens on a tripod. However, I've confirmed with Canon techs that this is only suggested to save battery power, since IS draws a little. But, having used IS lenses alongside non-IS lenses often, I don't think it draws very much power. Besides, the lenses that "sense" lack of movement and turn off IS automatically will accomplish the same power savings.
All this pertains to Canon IS.... I have no idea if any of it is relevant to other image stabilization systems.