New camera
Apr 21, 2019 03:17:16 #
MDI Mainer wrote:
As far as I am aware there are three main differen... (show quote)
They BOTH have IBIS, Mainer … but in the a6500, it's 5-axis IBIS, which the a6400 lacks …
Apr 21, 2019 10:57:30 #
Chris T wrote:
They BOTH have IBIS, Mainer … but in the a6500, it's 5-axis IBIS, which the a6400 lacks …
Sorry, but I don't think the A6400 has any IBIS function. Some lenses may offer less than 5-axis stabilization, but it's not not in that camera body. The failure to include IBIS is the biggest criticism of the A6400.
https://www.theverge.com/2019/3/15/18266143/sony-a6400-review-mirrorless-compact-vlogging-camera
Apr 21, 2019 11:31:23 #
Apr 21, 2019 12:03:59 #
MDI Mainer wrote:
Sorry, but I don't think the A6400 has any IBIS function. Some lenses may offer less than 5-axis stabilization, but it's not not in that camera body. The failure to include IBIS is the biggest criticism of the A6400.
https://www.theverge.com/2019/3/15/18266143/sony-a6400-review-mirrorless-compact-vlogging-camera
https://www.theverge.com/2019/3/15/18266143/sony-a6400-review-mirrorless-compact-vlogging-camera
Mainer - 5-axis Stabilization is incorporated into the body of the Sony a6500, the a99 II, the a9, and MOST
of the a7 series. It has NOTHING to do with lenses. The a6000 series - all incorporate BASIC IBIS, as do the SLT series. Since the a6400 is relatively new, I don't really know - but, I assumed it had basic IBIS, just like the others in the series. It would really surprise me if it wasn't there. Are you sure? … I think the fuss is - because, it's NEW, and lacks the 5-axis IBIS, incorporated in the a6500. But, pretty sure it has IBIS.
Apr 21, 2019 13:21:04 #
MDI Mainer wrote:
Sorry, but I don't think the A6400 has any IBIS function. Some lenses may offer less than 5-axis stabilization, but it's not not in that camera body. The failure to include IBIS is the biggest criticism of the A6400.
https://www.theverge.com/2019/3/15/18266143/sony-a6400-review-mirrorless-compact-vlogging-camera
https://www.theverge.com/2019/3/15/18266143/sony-a6400-review-mirrorless-compact-vlogging-camera
Mainer - checked three different reviews, now - of the a6400. That would seem to be the case - it lacks, even - BASIC IBIS (In-Body Image Stabilization) - who knew? … That means it relies on ILIS (In-Lens Image Stabilization) - of which, there are NOT many - in the Sony Camp, anyway - but, there may be some made by third-party manufacturers of E-Mount APS-C MILC (Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Camera) lenses … which are multiplying like flies, now. I am - to say the least - VERY surprised by this. Thanks !!!!!
Apr 21, 2019 15:36:57 #
I am sorry I ask this question. I am an 80 year old retired farmer that takes a lot of pictures on auto. I do not need approval to buy anything. I have read about a lot about cameras and lenses and found out everyone likes what they have. I thought I would ask you experts what you think. I got a few good answers and some smart remarks. Sorry to take up your time.
Apr 21, 2019 16:53:11 #
Jfendley wrote:
I am sorry I ask this question. I am an 80 year old retired farmer that takes a lot of pictures on auto. I do not need approval to buy anything. I have read about a lot about cameras and lenses and found out everyone likes what they have. I thought I would ask you experts what you think. I got a few good answers and some smart remarks. Sorry to take up your time.
J - after reading some reviews of the a6400 - I have to admit it's an excellent choice, and quite a trade-up from the original a6000. However, the lack of ANY kind of IBIS, makes me a little wary. The a6300 - DOES include IBIS, and in the a6500 - you'd have the best kind of IBIS - which is 5-axis. I'm a little younger than you (but not by much) and I have to admit - it is very difficult to hold ANY kind of camera steady (no matter how small it is) once you attach a longish lens - say - anything above 135mm to 200mm. If you have any lenses that long - I would recommend you stay with the a6000, or - if you choose to upgrade - go to the a6500 (or the a6300) - which BOTH have IBIS - like your a6000 (but the IBIS in the a6500 is better.)
Apr 21, 2019 17:41:03 #
While there is nothing wrong with the A6400 but if I have the A6000 I wouldn't buy the A6400.
Apr 21, 2019 18:58:45 #
BebuLamar wrote:
While there is nothing wrong with the A6400 but if I have the A6000 I wouldn't buy the A6400.
The a6400 seems to be one fantastic camera, Bebu … it has many of the advanced features of the FF series - like the a9 … but THAT camera has 5-way IBIS - so, it's a much better instrument than the a6400. IBIS is included in all the SLT series, and in the a99 II - it's 5-way IBIS, too. Those two cameras are BOTH pretty fine - call them magnificent - but, they're also quite pricey. The a6400 is aimed at a different market - but, those who should buy and use it - are those who need not be concerned about a camera w/o stabilization.
Apr 21, 2019 19:30:26 #
Let us be clear -- the A6300 does not have any in-body stabilization at all. Among the A6X00 lineup, only the A6500 has that feature, and it is the 5-axis version. All the rest rely exclusively on in-lens stabilization, if you want/need the stabilization function.
Apr 21, 2019 23:37:30 #
MDI Mainer wrote:
Let us be clear -- the A6300 does not have any in-body stabilization at all. Among the A6X00 lineup, only the A6500 has that feature, and it is the 5-axis version. All the rest rely exclusively on in-lens stabilization, if you want/need the stabilization function.
My mistake, Mainer …
All three of my SLTs have IBIS, so I assumed all the other Sony APS-C bodies did, too …
You're quite right! … The only a6000 series body with IBIS - is the a6500 - as I'd already indicated.
And, yes - it is the 5-way kind ...
Apr 22, 2019 09:32:18 #
My surmise is that Sony didn't feel the need to differentiate their ground-breaking mirrorless line from Canon/Nikon (now playing belated catch-up). With the SLTs the in-body stabilization was a significant change from the dominant market players, so an important plus. But who knows.
Apr 22, 2019 13:06:36 #
MDI Mainer wrote:
My surmise is that Sony didn't feel the need to differentiate their ground-breaking mirrorless line from Canon/Nikon (now playing belated catch-up). With the SLTs the in-body stabilization was a significant change from the dominant market players, so an important plus. But who knows.
Yes, but Nikon followed Sony's lead and incorporated IBIS into the Z6 and Z7, whilst Canon - has, so far - left it out - of the EOS R and EOS RP, anyway … but there's a new REVEAL - promised at the Jacob Javits Center in NYC in October … so, I suspect that's when Canon (and Sony) will reveal some new goodies - and, if they're smart - Ricoh / Pentax will, too … time will tell …
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.