Blurryeyed wrote:
No, that is not what Barr said.
You are correct but the losers are merely parrotting what they are told to say by the DNC talking points being put out.
They are incapable of independent thought and yhis report destroys their whole little world of DNC lies for the past 2 years.
Look how jubilent they have been for 2 years now "Knowing" any minute the President will be guilty of obstruction and collusion.
Americans ALL knew the President was innocent. Only democrats and losers believed the DNC talking points.
Still wont vote for Trump
johnst1001a wrote:
Still wont vote for Trump
You never would anyway so what.
Frank T wrote:
4 page statement of a 2 year investigation.
Release the report .
America paid for it and it belongs to us.
It is a crime to release grand jury material and they typically do not release material about people who are not indicted. So what you’re doing is asking that they break the law, typical Democrat.
Blurryeyed wrote:
No, that is not what Barr said.
Here is an excerpt from Barr's 4 page statement:
"The Special Counsel therefore did not draw a conclusion - one way or the other – as to whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction. Instead, for each of the relevant actions investigated, the report sets out evidence on both sides of the question and leaves unresolved what the Special Counsel views as “difficult issues” of law and fact concerning whether the President's actions and intent could be viewed as obstruction. The Special Counsel states that “while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”"
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/03/24/us/politics/barr-letter-mueller-report.html
When Barr was AG during the Bush administration he save Bush's Bacon.
"Barr ran the Justice Department once before, under President George H.W. Bush.
Back then, the all-consuming, years-long scandal was called Iran-Contra. On Dec. 24, 1992, it ended when Bush pardoned six people who had been caught up in it.
Then-Attorney General Barr supported the president's decision in the Iran-Contra case, which gave clemency to people who had been officials in the administration of President Ronald Reagan, including former Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger. He had been set to go on trial to face charges about lying to Congress.
To the man who led the Iran-Contra investigation, however, the pardons represented a miscarriage of justice.
"It demonstrates that powerful people with powerful allies can commit serious crimes in high office, deliberately abusing the public trust without consequences," said Lawrence Walsh, the independent prosecutor in the case, at the time of the pardons."
https://www.npr.org/2019/01/14/684553791/william-barr-supported-pardons-in-an-earlier-d-c-witch-hunt-iran-contra
That’s what you get when no crime is committed but you look at the person.
You need to investigate the crime to find the person. When you investigate the person, you got nothing.
Just because the president wasn't indicted doesn't mean his actions are respectable.
Many in organized crime are never indicted.
LWW
Loc: Banana Republic of America
BigWahoo wrote:
Here is an excerpt from Barr's 4 page statement:
"The Special Counsel therefore did not draw a conclusion - one way or the other – as to whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction. Instead, for each of the relevant actions investigated, the report sets out evidence on both sides of the question and leaves unresolved what the Special Counsel views as “difficult issues” of law and fact concerning whether the President's actions and intent could be viewed as obstruction. The Special Counsel states that “while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”"
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/03/24/us/politics/barr-letter-mueller-report.htmlHere is an excerpt from Barr's 4 page statement: b... (
show quote)
Weasel words from a deep state weasel.
Frank T wrote:
4 page statement of a 2 year investigation.
Release the report .
America paid for it and it belongs to us.
Little Frankie, this may come as a surprise to you, but the report DOES NOT belong to you. You lib fascist socialist dems are all screaming release the report, which, unless you are an idiot, you know full well it cannot be released in its entirety. Things discovered that are NOT a crime, do not get released. Grand Jury testimony DOES NOT get released. Classified information DOES NOT get released. I'm sure there are other things that do no get release. Move on, Democrats look like the spoiled little cry babies they are.
LWW wrote:
Weasel words from a deep state weasel.
I thought that you would have liked the Barr report. He was hand picked by the president.
Kraken wrote:
Nowhere did anyone say no obstruction.
Krackhead, you are not an American and who cares what you think. It DOES NOT SAY OBSTRUCTION. The Attorney General and Rod Rosenstein, both agree there is not obstruction. But out. Go give canada the benefit of you lack of intelligence.
Frank T wrote:
I'm fine with the Mueller Report, just dont think a 4 year investigation can be reduced to four pages by Barr, who I trust less.
I expect transparency and there isn't any here.
You never know, the report might say Hillary was a Russian agent, but we'll never know unless the report is released.
Little Frankie it only seemed like four years, it was actually 22 months, millions wasted on a false lying premise put out there by the dems. It was all a hoax.
BigWahoo wrote:
Just because the president wasn't indicted doesn't mean his actions are respectable.
Many in organized crime are never indicted.
What happened to all of you russia collucion crap??? You lib fascist socialist dems are a piece of work.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.