There are a couple of "pro" photographers in my area that like to take photos of people with the sun in the photo, usually near their head. The sun blows out the shot and sometimes you can't even see their face. I think it looks hideous, but wanted opinions from others. If you don't understand what I am talking about, maybe I can reproduce and post.
Val
Loc: Minnesota
SDav612 wrote:
There are a couple of "pro" photographers in my area that like to take photos of people with the sun in the photo, usually near their head. The sun blows out the shot and sometimes you can't even see their face. I think it looks hideous, but wanted opinions from others. If you don't understand what I am talking about, maybe I can reproduce and post.
Are you talking about something like this?
A photo example is worth a thousand words of explanation.
Val
Loc: Minnesota
I think he is talking about lens flare from the sun.
Val wrote:
SDav612 wrote:
There are a couple of "pro" photographers in my area that like to take photos of people with the sun in the photo, usually near their head. The sun blows out the shot and sometimes you can't even see their face. I think it looks hideous, but wanted opinions from others. If you don't understand what I am talking about, maybe I can reproduce and post.
Are you talking about something like this?
No, where the sun is so over exposed that it blows out the side of their face where you can barely recognize the person. I will try to duplicate tomorrow and post, because of course I can't post the ones I am talking about.
Val wrote:
I think he is talking about lens flare from the sun.
You are explaining. Where is the picture?
SDav612 wrote:
There are a couple of "pro" photographers in my area that like to take photos of people with the sun in the photo, usually near their head. The sun blows out the shot and sometimes you can't even see their face. I think it looks hideous, but wanted opinions from others. If you don't understand what I am talking about, maybe I can reproduce and post.
This is one, but there is another photographer that is much, much worse.
SDav612 wrote:
This is one, but there is another photographer that is much, much worse.
First reaction: If this were my photo, I would never show it to anyone.
Second reaction: The word "Pro", or professional, means that someone's efforts are their main source of income. A professional poker player has no other significant source of income. Same for a professional boxer, professional actor, or a professional photographer.
I have photography clients, but photography is not my primary source of income. I consider myself a free-lance photographer. My 1040 reflects money earned, and money spent on photography.
If my photos looked like the example presented above, I would not be making any money as a photographer.
Nikonian72 wrote:
SDav612 wrote:
This is one, but there is another photographer that is much, much worse.
First reaction: If this were my photo, I would never show it to anyone.
Second reaction: The word "Pro", or professional, means that someone's efforts are their main source of income. A professional poker player has no other significant source of income. Same for a professional boxer, professional actor, or a professional photographer.
I have photography clients, but photography is not my primary source of income. I consider myself a free-lance photographer. My 1040 reflects money earned, and money spent on photography.
If my photos looked like the example presented above, I would not be making any money as a photographer.
quote=SDav612 This is one, but there is another ... (
show quote)
That was my reaction too and like I said, the other local photographer is much worse. Some of her's look like they have a lightbulb on the side of their head. It drives me crazy! This one posted, my daughter actually had to pay for!
SDav612 wrote:
That was my reaction too and like I said, the other local photographer is much worse. Some of her's look like they have a lightbulb on the side of their head. It drives me crazy! This one posted, my daughter actually had to pay for!
If that is your daughter in the photo, she looks okay. But her companion is melting!
Nikonian72 wrote:
SDav612 wrote:
This is one, but there is another photographer that is much, much worse.
First reaction: If this were my photo, I would never show it to anyone.
Second reaction: The word "Pro", or professional, means that someone's efforts are their main source of income. A professional poker player has no other significant source of income. Same for a professional boxer, professional actor, or a professional photographer.
I have photography clients, but photography is not my primary source of income. I consider myself a free-lance photographer. My 1040 reflects money earned, and money spent on photography.
If my photos looked like the example presented above, I would not be making any money as a photographer.
quote=SDav612 This is one, but there is another ... (
show quote)
i agree! i'm not a pro in that i do not earn my living at photography (though i do sell my work), but i would never even attempt a shot from that angle, much less offer it to a client!!
Quote:
That was my reaction too and like I said, the other local photographer is much worse. Some of her's look like they have a lightbulb on the side of their head. It drives me crazy! This one posted, my daughter actually had to pay for!
if i were your daughter, i'd demand a re-shoot!
MWAC
Loc: Somewhere East Of Crazy
I can't say I would want to be paying for something like this.
I try not to compare my images other photographers because there might be some that I feel are not on the same level I am YET, there are many, many more that can and do blow me out of the water. I strive to be happy with what I produce (not there yet) but images like this are not on my "want to duplicate" list.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.