Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
True Macro-Photography Forum
Locking Eyes With Spiders and Insects - From Nat Geo
Feb 21, 2013 23:31:32   #
Remoman Loc: Someplace Remote Near LA
 
http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/artscience/2013/02/locking-eyes-with-spiders-and-insects/?

Reply
Feb 22, 2013 02:14:54   #
St3v3M Loc: 35,000 feet
 
Excellent article. Well spoken, educational and beautiful. Thank you!

This would be fun http://www.snomnh.ou.edu/exhibits

And his Flickr page http://www.flickr.com/photos/opoterser

Reply
Feb 22, 2013 08:32:58   #
gym Loc: Athens, Georgia
 
These photos are incredible. I took a look at some of the EXIF data and though there is no f/stop info, it's interesting that even though the shutter speed is often around 1/180 or so, the ISO for the ones I examined is 100. Getting the right amount of light for such a low ISO while maintaining a relatively quick shutter speed is quite a trick.

I also note that we have contributions to this forum whose quality rivals those by Mr. Shahan. It's worth a trip to this page at least a couple of times a day to view the macrotreasures posted by this membership.

Reply
 
 
Feb 22, 2013 08:54:13   #
Screamin Scott Loc: Marshfield Wi, Baltimore Md, now Dallas Ga
 
I've seen his work many times...He is a contact of mine over on Flickr...

Reply
Feb 22, 2013 12:34:55   #
Bozsik Loc: Orangevale, California
 
Remoman wrote:
http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/artscience/2013/02/locking-eyes-with-spiders-and-insects/?


There are people on this site who produce similar quality work.

Reply
Feb 22, 2013 12:56:30   #
Nikonian72 Loc: Chico CA
 
gym wrote:
it's interesting that even though the shutter speed is often around 1/180 or so, the ISO for the ones I examined is 100. Getting the right amount of light for such a low ISO while maintaining a relatively quick shutter speed is quite a trick.
When a heavily-diffused illumination source is placed so close to the subject, the light-coverage is excellent, and the flash duration can be extremely short.

Reply
Feb 22, 2013 13:00:33   #
LoneRangeFinder Loc: Left field
 
Love the shot of Shahan on the ground with the duct taped DIY diffuser.

Reply
 
 
Feb 22, 2013 20:27:21   #
Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.
 
Nikonian72 wrote:
When a heavily-diffused illumination source is placed so close to the subject, the light-coverage is excellent, and the flash duration can be extremely short.
To add to what Douglass said I recently looking at Shahan's Flickr page and noted that he has gotten a new Flash Unit and interestingly has built a new foldable softbox that measures 8"X10".

Shahan has been an inspiration to a lot of us here and elsewhere and I think that I can say that both Martin and I have paid close attention to flash brackets and softboxes. I know that in copying some of his ideas my photography improved greatly.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/opoterser/7216539208/in/photostream

Reply
Feb 22, 2013 20:33:56   #
Nikonian72 Loc: Chico CA
 
Also note that Shahan controls both illumination and colors of his backgrounds.

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8459/7923719100_b7e5a2dcc1_c.jpg
Female Jumping Spider - Phidippus regius - Florida by Thomas Shahan, on Flickr

http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5197/6908604600_53c9a3a23c_c.jpg
Male Dimorphic Jumping Spider (Maevia inclemens) by Thomas Shahan, on Flickr

Reply
Feb 22, 2013 20:45:12   #
Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.
 
Nikonian72 wrote:
Also note that Shahan controls both illumination and colors of his backgrounds.
I think that super large soft box helps with that, If you look at that Smithsonian article linked by this post you will see his old softbox which was also quite large, but the way that he has it positioned a large portion of that box is out over the front of his lens aiming away from the camera... My box is a bit smaller than his but I have found that same type of set up to work very well... I feel like I have also found that the larger the box the stronger flash is needed, so it does seem that there is always some sort of trade off going on... But I agree that both Shahan and the guy he mentions and hyperlinks in on his flickr page both do an excellent job of background management to the point that you are seeing blue sky's in the background instead of blackness caused by full flash.

Reply
Feb 22, 2013 22:04:35   #
martinfisherphoto Loc: Lake Placid Florida
 
Nikonian72 wrote:
Also note that Shahan controls both illumination and colors of his backgrounds.
If you look closely you will notice many of the spiders are photographed on some sort of Leaf. In reading Shahans notes you will also see where he mentions sometimes taking the spiders home to photograph. Also when he's out and about with a group, they will collect the spiders return to a central location to photograph and release into the wild. I would suggest many of his photos are taken as such, under controlled conditions/lighting/props/background.
Regardless how they are taken they have been an inspiration to me and I have set me goals to this standard. I have the Jumping Spider fever thanks to Mr. Shahan and the folks on this forum have helped me to reach for that goal.

Reply
 
 
Feb 23, 2013 03:20:36   #
LoneRangeFinder Loc: Left field
 
fstop22 wrote:
Nikonian72 wrote:
Also note that Shahan controls both illumination and colors of his backgrounds.
If you look closely you will notice many of the spiders are photographed on some sort of Leaf. In reading Shahans notes you will also see where he mentions sometimes taking the spiders home to photograph. Also when he's out and about with a group, they will collect the spiders return to a central location to photograph and release into the wild. I would suggest many of his photos are taken as such, under controlled conditions/lighting/props/background.
Regardless how they are taken they have been an inspiration to me and I have set me goals to this standard. I have the Jumping Spider fever thanks to Mr. Shahan and the folks on this forum have helped me to reach for that goal.
quote=Nikonian72 Also note that Shahan controls b... (show quote)


He claims at one point to take about 90% on location. I'd like to know how he was able to do a manual 3 stack of a spider. I guess I'll have to redesign my soft box again. I'm curious about the folding 8x10 model. I sort of got off on another DIY project: a panoramic head made from an altered Stroboframe Flash bracket

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
True Macro-Photography Forum
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.