More Thunderbirds
Feb 14, 2013 14:58:34 #
Feb 14, 2013 15:06:34 #
Nice, but the watermarks are distracting with a bit of overkill.
Feb 14, 2013 15:10:20 #
Feb 14, 2013 15:19:52 #
mikeyatc wrote:
what were your camera settings?
for no. 1:
shutter speed 1/1600 sec., 300mm focal length, f5.6,exposure manual with +0.7 exposure comp., ISO 140, focus mode AF-A, AF area 3-D tracking
for no.2 :
same except for shutter speed 1/1250 sec., ISO 220, and focal length 220mm
Feb 14, 2013 15:40:02 #
I have also said that about the watermarks before, way ott and in fact I don't look at the photos because of it
Feb 14, 2013 15:43:39 #
JR1 wrote:
I have also said that about the watermarks before, way ott and in fact I don't look at the photos because of it
So, don't look.
Feb 14, 2013 16:43:45 #
Geezer wrote:
Nice, but the watermarks are distracting with a bit of overkill.
ok i can understand 1 watermark in a lower corner but 9 watermarks on 1 photo is a bit excessive and quite distracting and ruins a otherwise nice photo
Feb 14, 2013 17:11:55 #
[quote=Rob48]
Hey, cmon, you posted your pictures to get some sort of response. Some might be accolades, and some might be a little advice. If we all took your comment literally, you won't have an audience. So, please, I'm a newcomer here and I'd like to read more good vibes....
JR1[/quote wrote:
So, don't look.
So, don't look.
Hey, cmon, you posted your pictures to get some sort of response. Some might be accolades, and some might be a little advice. If we all took your comment literally, you won't have an audience. So, please, I'm a newcomer here and I'd like to read more good vibes....
Feb 14, 2013 17:26:25 #
Feb 14, 2013 18:12:07 #
dooragdragon wrote:
ok i can understand 1 watermark in a lower corner but 9 watermarks on 1 photo is a bit excessive and quite distracting and ruins a otherwise nice photo
Geezer wrote:
Nice, but the watermarks are distracting with a bit of overkill.
ok i can understand 1 watermark in a lower corner but 9 watermarks on 1 photo is a bit excessive and quite distracting and ruins a otherwise nice photo
People seem to have the feeling that all my photos have these distracting watermarks on them;any photos you see here with the watermarks are separate from identical photos without watermarks.
SEE EXAMPLE:
Feb 14, 2013 19:09:10 #
Geezer wrote:
Nice, but the watermarks are distracting with a bit of overkill.
Watermarking to the extreme. Such extreme watermarking is more about 'ego' than photo quality.
Pics are 'nice' but IMHO not worth the extreme watermarking destruction!
Feb 14, 2013 19:45:08 #
Rob48 wrote:
People seem to have the feeling that all my photos have these distracting watermarks on them;any photos you see here with the watermarks are separate from identical photos without watermarks.
SEE EXAMPLE:
dooragdragon wrote:
ok i can understand 1 watermark in a lower corner but 9 watermarks on 1 photo is a bit excessive and quite distracting and ruins a otherwise nice photo
Geezer wrote:
Nice, but the watermarks are distracting with a bit of overkill.
ok i can understand 1 watermark in a lower corner but 9 watermarks on 1 photo is a bit excessive and quite distracting and ruins a otherwise nice photo
People seem to have the feeling that all my photos have these distracting watermarks on them;any photos you see here with the watermarks are separate from identical photos without watermarks.
SEE EXAMPLE:
much nicer there now the planes get your atten not the watermarks
Feb 14, 2013 20:22:56 #
Rob48 wrote:
So, don't look.
JR1 wrote:
I have also said that about the watermarks before, way ott and in fact I don't look at the photos because of it
So, don't look.
Amen to that :thumbup:
Feb 14, 2013 20:36:56 #
Birdguide wrote:
Amen to that :thumbup:
Rob48 wrote:
So, don't look.
JR1 wrote:
I have also said that about the watermarks before, way ott and in fact I don't look at the photos because of it
So, don't look.
Amen to that :thumbup:
Thank you, Birdguide.
Feb 15, 2013 00:35:52 #
Excellent! I alway's take criticism as constructive too push me to the next level.
Rob48 wrote:
People seem to have the feeling that all my photos have these distracting watermarks on them;any photos you see here with the watermarks are separate from identical photos without watermarks.
SEE EXAMPLE:
dooragdragon wrote:
ok i can understand 1 watermark in a lower corner but 9 watermarks on 1 photo is a bit excessive and quite distracting and ruins a otherwise nice photo
Geezer wrote:
Nice, but the watermarks are distracting with a bit of overkill.
ok i can understand 1 watermark in a lower corner but 9 watermarks on 1 photo is a bit excessive and quite distracting and ruins a otherwise nice photo
People seem to have the feeling that all my photos have these distracting watermarks on them;any photos you see here with the watermarks are separate from identical photos without watermarks.
SEE EXAMPLE:
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.