it's still all about the money,if the the customers stood up and demanded an affordable ff camera,they would come out with one.
ole sarg wrote:
In film we wanted to work with a big negative. In short, a Haselbad or a Pentax 645 was a most desired camera. The reason being negative size.
Why doesn't the same hold true for sensor size. A FF vs a crop sensor. Why would one prefer a crop sensor over a FF sensor?
After all isn't it all about capturing data?
The DX began life because it was cheaper to build, and it is still selling today because it is cheaper to buy.
If I want "reach" I use my D7000 or D800e in crop mode. If I want capture data (resolution) I have that option with full-frame.
Looked at the Rockwell article and there is quite a difference in image quality.
I think should I go back to a dslr that i would go full frame. It seems that size does matter!
Searcher wrote:
I'd jump hurlers ....
I always enjoy input from you guys across the pond. What the heck is jumping hurlers?
OddJobber wrote:
Searcher wrote:
I'd jump hurlers ....
I always enjoy input from you guys across the pond. What the heck is jumping hurlers?
Its an English spelling error - should have read "hurdles" - sorry!
rpavich wrote:
ole sarg wrote:
In film we wanted to work with a big negative. In short, a Haselbad or a Pentax 645 was a most desired camera. The reason being negative size.
Why doesn't the same hold true for sensor size. A FF vs a crop sensor. Why would one prefer a crop sensor over a FF sensor?
After all isn't it all about capturing data?
It's still true. Larger sensors capture more detail and finer details.
I don't know why one would prefer a cropped sensor camera...but I KNOW that this is going to spark the "longer reach" debate...just wait and see :)
quote=ole sarg In film we wanted to work with a b... (
show quote)
Check the prices and consider serious amateurs.
Searcher wrote:
I'd jump hurlers....
That's a mental image I don't want, thanks :) !
Searcher wrote:
Its an English spelling error - should have read "hurdles" - sorry!
Got a great laugh from that. The only thing I could find with Google was the players on a hurling team, and certainly another mental image I didn't need! :oops: :-D
I know that some of the comments I read on this site at times makes me want to hurl!
;-)
bdo
Loc: Colorado
Zero_Equals_Infinity wrote:
One tends to think of a crop sensor as offering an equivalent of a longer lens. What it really comes down to is pixel pitch / density. If a crop sensor, full frame and medium format camera all have the same pixel pitch, then the difference is solely one of the surface area of a sensor. (e.g. Nikon D7000 at 16MP, D800 at 36MP and Phase One IQ180 at 80MP all have the same pixel pitch.)
What the larger sensor offers is a larger capture for a lens of the same focal length, more detail (by changing lens) for a capture of the same composition with a shallower depth of field.
One tends to think of a crop sensor as offering an... (
show quote)
I don't know about the Phase One IQ180 at 80MP, but the pixel pitch on the D800 is 4.8 microns vs. 4.4 on the D7000. Not a huge difference, but about 10% more density for the D7000.
MT Shooter wrote:
I know that some of the comments I read on this site at times makes me want to hurl!
;-)
MT have you been peeking at Chit-Chat again? :-)
MT Shooter wrote:
I know that some of the comments I read on this site at times makes me want to hurl!
;-)
Shooter what I like about you is that you are honest & straight forward which in my amateur eyes is very helpful. I posted the picture of the black cow in the grass for people to ell me what I did wrong. You were very honest & I understood what you said & liked to 10 second pp you did to balance the color & sharpen. I'm out tomorrow to Try out my new 24-105 & will post pictures for your critique which will be very much appreciated.
BHC
Loc: Strawberry Valley, JF, USA
It's ruining the economy. If people had to carry my two F4S bodies, four to six lenses and associated gear around, we'd have more chiropractors, more of their office workers and less unemployment. We would all be in better condition. And look at all the film manufacturers, processors, and related industries and their employees. I tell you, this digital stuff is making us a nation of weaklings!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.