DxO Optics Pro v.8
Jan 22, 2013 09:02:05 #
Is anyone on the forum is using Dxo and Lightroom? Other than the lens/camera corrections in DxO, does it have any advantages over Lightroom?
Feb 16, 2013 12:35:01 #
I don't use LR. I use DxO since a couple of years. It's this software that brought me back to digital photography. I am on version 8 now.
(Only) if your camera/lens combination is supported by DxO does this s/w do the better job on geometric correction, dynamic range correction and chromatic aberration. In most cases, when I develop my RAW pictures I use the Auto function which carries out 8 automatic functions. Geometry needs hand work.
DxO misses a serious Organizer module. I use PSE10 for that.
There is a good review in PC Magazine (of version 7 though):
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2397431,00.asp
(Only) if your camera/lens combination is supported by DxO does this s/w do the better job on geometric correction, dynamic range correction and chromatic aberration. In most cases, when I develop my RAW pictures I use the Auto function which carries out 8 automatic functions. Geometry needs hand work.
DxO misses a serious Organizer module. I use PSE10 for that.
There is a good review in PC Magazine (of version 7 though):
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2397431,00.asp
Feb 16, 2013 12:36:35 #
I don't use LR. I use DxO since a couple of years. It's this software that brought me back to digital photography. I am on version 8 now.
(Only) if your camera/lens combination is supported by DxO does this s/w do the better job on geometric correction, dynamic range correction and chromatic aberration. In most cases, when I develop my RAW pictures I use the Auto function which carries out 8 automatic functions. Geometry needs hand work.
DxO misses a serious Organizer module. I use PSE10 for that.
There is a good review in PC Magazine (of version 7 though):
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2397431,00.asp
(Only) if your camera/lens combination is supported by DxO does this s/w do the better job on geometric correction, dynamic range correction and chromatic aberration. In most cases, when I develop my RAW pictures I use the Auto function which carries out 8 automatic functions. Geometry needs hand work.
DxO misses a serious Organizer module. I use PSE10 for that.
There is a good review in PC Magazine (of version 7 though):
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2397431,00.asp
Jun 20, 2013 06:43:35 #
Jun 20, 2013 06:44:06 #
Jun 20, 2013 06:48:33 #
andrew.haysom
Loc: Melbourne, Australia
mikeschwartz wrote:
Is anyone on the forum is using Dxo and Lightroom? Other than the lens/camera corrections in DxO, does it have any advantages over Lightroom?
I am using DxO Optics Pro, but not Lightroom, I use PS Elements. I love DxO for the Lens Correction, it does a brilliant job with chromatic aberration. I have some non-Canon lenses which don't work with Digital Photo Professional.
I also use DxO for the perspective correction features which I find really easy to use.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.