Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
True Macro-Photography Forum
Ring flash for macro
Page <prev 2 of 2
Jan 22, 2013 13:45:47   #
Nikonian72 Loc: Chico CA
 
As per the chart posted above, I concur that the YN-560 (similar to YN-565) is more powerful than SB-600. Where did you find GN 58 (meters)?

I am going to create an FAQ based on this chart, to assist photographers in comparing speedlight output.

Reply
Jan 22, 2013 13:49:49   #
Screamin Scott Loc: Marshfield Wi, Baltimore Md, now Dallas Ga
 
I'm copying & pasting my response from the original thread on the "Main" forum...I'm also including a shot of my macro lighting equipment...My go-to ring/point light has a GN of 50 @ ASA 100 & the point light is 95 @ ASA 100 (ASA is the film equivalent of ISO)

I've got ring lights, ring/point lights, "O" ray flash unit & LED ring light....My advice, go with the ring or ring/point light for convenience, portability & power...I've attached an image of my units. BTW, what camera system are you using ? (helps with making suggestions)...My ring/point lights are the brand that made them popular (Lester Dine) back in the 1980's...You can find them used on eBay for a lot less than new offerings...



Reply
Jan 22, 2013 13:50:05   #
hangman45 Loc: Hueytown Alabama
 
Nikonian72 wrote:
As per the chart posted above, I concur that the YN-560 (similar to YN-565) is more powerful than SB-600. Where did you find GN 58 (meters)?
One place is on the link you provided
http://speedlights.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/YN-560-Instruction-Manual-42.jpg
But I knew it already because that are the manufactures specs off their page
http://www.yongnuostore.com/product/yongnuo-yn-560-yn560-flash-speedlight_pentax/
I know this is the one listed as Pentax but they are all the same

Reply
 
 
Jan 22, 2013 13:52:29   #
DOOK Loc: Maclean, Australia
 
All I can say re. the YN-560 is..Forgetting all the technical jargon & comparisons, I have had mine for a year & it has more than enough power for my needs. I have a very large back yard & it can illuminate the entire yard no problem.

Anyway, I bought a dedicated macro flash yesterday (JY-670), so I wan't have to use the YN-560 for macro work now.

Reply
Jan 22, 2013 13:53:30   #
LoneRangeFinder Loc: Left field
 
Nikonian72 wrote:
As per the chart posted above, I concur that the YN-560 (similar to YN-565) is more powerful than SB-600.
Way down the list is my SB-400. For macro, my starting point is ASA 400, 1/200 shutter duration, & f/22, with my flash @ 1/16-manual. Of course, that's for winter light in Portland OR, in January. Of course, it changes for subject matter, time of day, location, weather.... etc. This is diffused with a DIY softbox & working distance for 1:1. So if my "mighty mouse" can do it, the others above it can as well.

Reply
Jan 22, 2013 13:58:49   #
Screamin Scott Loc: Marshfield Wi, Baltimore Md, now Dallas Ga
 
DOOK wrote:
I bought a dedicated macro flash yesterday (JY-670), so I wan't have to use the YN-560 for macro work now.
That JY-670 only has a GN of 14....Seriously underpowered...I have a very similar unit (same basic features) with a GN of 10...Also, if it's like what I have, the flash duration is only 1/100th of a second....Again, not very effective...

Reply
Jan 22, 2013 14:10:13   #
hangman45 Loc: Hueytown Alabama
 
Screamin Scott wrote:
That That JY-670 only has a GN of 14....Seriously underpowered.
Ring Flashes have a much lower GN rating than regular hot shoe flashes the $550.00 Pentax ring flash only has a GN of 16 meters at ISO100

Reply
 
 
Jan 22, 2013 14:11:39   #
Nikonian72 Loc: Chico CA
 
Ring-flashes and softboxes are not meant to illuminate at distance, so standard GN comparison is moot.

My O-Flash diffuser attached to my SB-600 would generate a pitiful GN.

Reply
Jan 22, 2013 14:22:51   #
Nikonian72 Loc: Chico CA
 
hangman45 wrote:
Nikonian72 wrote:
As per the chart posted above, I concur that the YN-560 (similar to YN-565) is more powerful than SB-600. Where did you find GN 58 (meters)?
One place is on the link you provided
http://speedlights.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/YN-560-Instruction-Manual-42.jpg
But I knew it already because that are the manufactures specs off their page
http://www.yongnuostore.com/product/yongnuo-yn-560-yn560-flash-speedlight_pentax/
I know this is the one listed as Pentax but they are all the same
quote=Nikonian72 As per the chart posted above, I... (show quote)
"Guide number: 58 at ISO100, (at) 105MM (flash angle)"
For variable angle speedlights, you must use only 35-mm angle for comparison. "105-mm" is speedlight set to telephoto mode (narrow angle).

Reply
Jan 22, 2013 14:53:48   #
Screamin Scott Loc: Marshfield Wi, Baltimore Md, now Dallas Ga
 
hangman45 wrote:
Ring Flashes have a much lower GN rating than regular hot shoe flashes the $550.00 Pentax ring flash only has a GN of 16 meters at ISO100
Good to know !

Reply
Jan 22, 2013 18:35:54   #
LoneRangeFinder Loc: Left field
 
Nikonian72 wrote:
Ring-flashes and softboxes are not meant to illuminate at distance, so standard GN comparison is moot.
My O-Flash diffuser attached to my SB-600 would generate a pitiful GN.
Ah... light goes on.... :oops:
The "correct" flash output for macro at the same distance/settings is identical; the fractional setting might differ depending on the power of the unit.

Reply
 
 
Jan 23, 2013 08:16:46   #
richardh76 Loc: VT, Central, Champlain Valley
 
Many thanks for starting this thread. Very informative and helpful.
Richard

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
True Macro-Photography Forum
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.