Just getting into B&W shooting and am finding myself loving it more everday. Most have been converted from color but I plan to start shooting in monochrome to see if I can develope a better B&W eye. Any suggestions are welcome...........
MWAC
Loc: Somewhere East Of Crazy
I like #2 the best.
I would recommend not shooting in monochrome but rather keep shooting in colour and converting. You can control your highlights, low lights and mid tones that way. where when shooing in monochrome you are letting the camera make the choices for you. (I don't think this is ever a good idea).
MWAC wrote:
I like #2 the best.
I would recommend not shooting in monochrome but rather keep shooting in colour and converting. You can control your highlights, low lights and mid tones that way. where when shooing in monochrome you are letting the camera make the choices for you. (I don't think this is ever a good idea).
I've heard the same thing, MWAC... but have been tweaking the levels you mention in processing work even when I shoot in B&W, too.
It doesn't make a HUGE difference, but enough of one that I
THINK I'm making a difference in them! *snickers*
These aren't bad... however, I'm still learning what makes a great B&W shot and what constitutes bland or mediocre, myself... so no critiquing from me, just opinion! :)
Number two is my fave. of the set as well... enough varying tones to keep things interesting. It's well exposed but not overly so... and the scene is clear.
MWAC
Loc: Somewhere East Of Crazy
tilde531 wrote:
MWAC wrote:
I like #2 the best.
I would recommend not shooting in monochrome but rather keep shooting in colour and converting. You can control your highlights, low lights and mid tones that way. where when shooing in monochrome you are letting the camera make the choices for you. (I don't think this is ever a good idea).
I've heard the same thing, MWAC... but have been tweaking the levels you mention in processing work even when I shoot in B&W, too.
It doesn't make a HUGE difference, but enough of one that I
THINK I'm making a difference in them! *snickers*
These aren't bad... however, I'm still learning what makes a great B&W shot and what constitutes bland or mediocre, myself... so no critiquing from me, just opinion! :)
Number two is my fave. of the set as well... enough varying tones to keep things interesting. It's well exposed but not overly so... and the scene is clear.
quote=MWAC I like #2 the best. br br I would r... (
show quote)
somewhere on the board, I posted my CS5 reciepe that I use for B/W conversations. I'll try to find it again later tonight.
To get great results you need to burn and dodge areas that you think need to be highlighted or darkened.
Well now I have 2 posts that seem to contradict each other. In my photo class the instructor agreed that you should always convert from color but on here I have heard some say the opposite. If converting makes the photos look blah what would you change to make them better????
MWAC wrote:
somewhere on the board, I posted my CS5 reciepe that I use for B/W conversations. I'll try to find it again later tonight.
To get great results you need to burn and dodge areas that you think need to be highlighted or darkened.
I remember reading it and thinking: "You GO girl!" It was very concise and easy to follow.... I was all excited about learning something new, etc.... but alas, I don't HAVE CS5 or Photoshop either. *grumble*
I thought I'd try your recipe using similar tools offered in the other programs I DO have, however.
Now the bad thing: I don't remember which thread it was either *blush * sowwie
Ah yes have seen these and was very impressed with the clarity. Like the lady above I don't have Photoshop but I use Picassa and there should be something I can do with that. What I would like to know is what would you suggest I do to make the pics more appealing if they appear bland---not sure what that means so I can adjust........
coco1964 wrote:
Ah yes have seen these and was very impressed with the clarity. Like the lady above I don't have Photoshop but I use Picassa and there should be something I can do with that. What I would like to know is what would you suggest I do to make the pics more appealing if they appear bland---not sure what that means so I can adjust........
Picasa won't give you these results, sadly.
I have and use it, too... and LightRoom3.
The closest to Photoshop and CS5 for FREE that I've found, is Gimp2.6 (or something like that). It has the same tools she's using HOWEVER... it's very difficult to learn what does what and how... especially with layers (since mine won't show me the layers in one place! grumble* )
coco: from what I can see, your barn and building shots are underexposed , too dark. They could use some selective lightening and brightening... to bring up the contrast and make the tones pop off one another.
To tweak (as this is what we are speaking of here) a color to a B&W the best but most complex way is to play with the layers.
If picassa is using layers, you are good to go. If not, use GIMP - free software (GNU license) that offers most (and sometime more than PS C5).
http://www.gimp.org/No, I am not working for them but when something is free and good, it is worth publicizing.
Note: learning curve is high.
MWAC
Loc: Somewhere East Of Crazy
You can so get these results with LE, my mentor only uses LR3 for his editting. The trick is getting your exposure and W/B spot on. And when you convert that your whites are white and your blacks are a tue black.
Blah b/w are usually are result of the image being more and black/grey conversation.
MWAC
Loc: Somewhere East Of Crazy
Sorry for any typos on my phone.
no. 3
I would dodge the clouds directly over the barn "SLIGHTLY".
I would then adjust the contrast over the whol picture.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.