Help with new Tamron 90mm.
Do you think that the new Tamron 90mm with image stabilizer is worth $300 (approx.) more than the regular 90mm without?
My friend is ready to make a purchase. She is fairly new to macro and is not crazy about using a tripod.
Is using a tripod a "must" for macro?
Without a tripod would the image stabilizer make that much of a difference and make up for not using the tripod?
Thanks for any advice!
A lens you keep forever. It is my opinion you get the best and never look back.
By far, most of the macro-photographers on this forum have matriculated to hand-held macro work. I only use a tripod when working in a controlled "studio" situation, whether indoors or outdoors.
I usually shoot living insects in the field. My normal Working Distance is 6-inches to 12-inches. About 2-years ago, I upgraded from an A-F, non-VR macro lens, to an A-F + VR lens. My 'keep rate' improved dramatically.
Thanks Photodan and Douglass!!
i use the sigma 105 macro hand held.i always manual focus with the optical stabilizer turned off.my sucess rate has also gone way up.to me it would not.tom
She must have her reasons for choosing the Tamron lens. Personally, I think a good illumination solution is more important than vibration control. That is something that your friend might want to consider, if she does not already have a good speedlight.
Do you mean a regular flash or something like a ring light?
Pixelpixie88 wrote:
Do you mean a regular flash or something like a ring light?
Personally I use a speedlight with a bracket and a diffuser, many of us use different solutions, it is personal preference.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.