Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
I'd Support Him
Page <<first <prev 13 of 13
Jan 4, 2013 17:31:41   #
tschmath Loc: Los Angeles
 
Eugene wrote:
Well, if that's true, I don't have a problem with it no more that any other form of contraception. I do agree that the government shouldn't be involved with these issues. I think they have their hands full with other issues.


This is the hypocrisy of religious zealots. You say you have no objection to any other kind of birth control. Birth control pills do not prevent conception, they merely stop implantation of a fertilized egg in the womb. Did you read that - a fertilized egg. Prevents implantation, meaning the fertilized egg dies. So what's different between that and an abortion at 10 or 12 or 13 weeks? In both cases, according to religious extremists, a human life is ended. But according to your own statement, a two-day old embryo can die, just not a more developed one. Total hypocrisy.

Reply
Jan 4, 2013 23:11:18   #
yhtomit Loc: Port Land. Oregon
 
tschmath wrote:
Eugene wrote:
Well, if that's true, I don't have a problem with it no more that any other form of contraception. I do agree that the government shouldn't be involved with these issues. I think they have their hands full with other issues.


This is the hypocrisy of religious zealots. You say you have no objection to any other kind of birth control. Birth control pills do not prevent conception, they merely stop implantation of a fertilized egg in the womb. Did you read that - a fertilized egg. Prevents implantation, meaning the fertilized egg dies. So what's different between that and an abortion at 10 or 12 or 13 weeks? In both cases, according to religious extremists, a human life is ended. But according to your own statement, a two-day old embryo can die, just not a more developed one. Total hypocrisy.
quote=Eugene Well, if that's true, I don't have a... (show quote)


What type of egg are you talking about tschmath?

Reply
Jan 4, 2013 23:15:26   #
JBTaylor Loc: In hiding again
 
Gnslngr wrote:
JBTaylor wrote:


Do you spend this much effort supporting all laws that you are not a fan of? I suspect you don't. What makes Obamacare special?


No, I don't. But I do spend time trying to make others see that any law must be applied to everyone equally. And trying to make others see that religion is used by hypocrites to justify their illegal behavior.


Interesting but how does that relate to this thread?

So do you have a problem with companies to which the administration chooses to give a waiver (apply unequally)? There is hypocrisy all around and religion is not necessary for it to exist. I have seen much hate, bigotry, and intolerance from self styled opponents of hate, bigotry, and intolerance.


Gnslngr wrote:
You seem inordinately focused not on your position, but on me. I'm flattered, but you should know I'm married.
:lol:


Interesting but incorrect interpretation. I'm married too. :lol:

Reply
 
 
Jan 4, 2013 23:16:28   #
tschmath Loc: Los Angeles
 
yhtomit wrote:
What type of egg are you talking about tschmath?


Are you serious? Or are you trying to make some sort of joke? I'm tKing about a fertilized human egg.

Reply
Jan 5, 2013 00:02:41   #
Gnslngr
 
JBTaylor wrote:
So do you have a problem with companies to which the administration chooses to give a waiver (apply unequally)?


Not a clue what you are talking about, but you seem more interested in pulling me into a discussion about Obama (who you incorrectly assume I support) because you apparently don't agree with him than having a real debate on the issues.

Not interested. :thumbup:

Reply
Jan 5, 2013 00:45:59   #
JBTaylor Loc: In hiding again
 
tschmath wrote:
Eugene wrote:
Well, if that's true, I don't have a problem with it no more that any other form of contraception. I do agree that the government shouldn't be involved with these issues. I think they have their hands full with other issues.


This is the hypocrisy of religious zealots. You say you have no objection to any other kind of birth control. Birth control pills do not prevent conception, they merely stop implantation of a fertilized egg in the womb. Did you read that - a fertilized egg. Prevents implantation, meaning the fertilized egg dies. So what's different between that and an abortion at 10 or 12 or 13 weeks? In both cases, according to religious extremists, a human life is ended. But according to your own statement, a two-day old embryo can die, just not a more developed one. Total hypocrisy.
quote=Eugene Well, if that's true, I don't have a... (show quote)


Really??? Are you serious? To be clear, I am not challenging your characterization of how birth control pills work. That view has been expressed by abortion opponents, particularly Catholics, who are also opposed to birth control of nearly every kind. But one gynecologist I know explained it differently to me. Frankly I can't tell where you stand on abortion or what your point is but your slander of Eugene as an example of the hypocrisy of religious zealots is unfair, illogical, and borderline dishonest.

First of all, let's include the full context of Eugene's comment including the part you conveniently left out.

Eugene wrote:
Well, if that's true, I don't have a problem with it no more that any other form of contraception. I do agree that the government shouldn't be involved with these issues. I think they have their hands full with other issues.
Blurryeyed wrote:
Eugene wrote:
If you believe that life happens at the time of conception it is.
Gnslngr wrote:
Bmac wrote:


A transplant is used to save life, blood transfusions are used to save life, psychiatric help is used to save life, ambulances are called to save life. The right to life will not be trumped by religious doctrine.

Abortion causing drugs are meant to end life. Your analogy is false. 8-)


Your facts are wrong. It's not an "abortion causing drug".


Actually Eugene you should read about the morning after pill, it prevents conception it is not an abortive drug contrary to popular belief.
quote=Eugene If you believe that life happens at ... (show quote)
b Well, if that's true /b , I don't have a proble... (show quote)


Eugene's not having a problem with the morning after pill is predicated on Blurryeyed's statement that the morning after pill prevents conception. Prior to that Eugene expressed opposition to it consistent with your viewpoint. Where is the hypocrisy?

So while you are tilting at windmills and using "heads, I win, tails. you lose" perversion of logic to falsely accuse Eugene of hypocrisy of the "religious zealot" variety, it is clear that your real disagreement is with Blurryeyed and Gnslngr.

You owe Eugene an apology.

By the way, are you opposed to birth control pills or are you okay with ending life at every stage of development or age for any reason?

Reply
Jan 5, 2013 06:37:26   #
Gnslngr
 
JBTaylor wrote:


You owe Eugene an apology.



Finally! The posting police are here!

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Reply
 
 
Jan 5, 2013 11:44:08   #
yhtomit Loc: Port Land. Oregon
 
tschmath wrote:
yhtomit wrote:
What type of egg are you talking about tschmath?


Are you serious? Or are you trying to make some sort of joke? I'm tKing about a fertilized human egg.


So...if this fertilized egg is indeed alive and developing,has life begun at this point?

Reply
Jan 5, 2013 11:57:52   #
PrairieSeasons Loc: Red River of the North
 
yhtomit wrote:
tschmath wrote:
yhtomit wrote:
What type of egg are you talking about tschmath?


Are you serious? Or are you trying to make some sort of joke? I'm tKing about a fertilized human egg.


So...if this fertilized egg is indeed alive and developing,has life begun at this point?


An interesting question that will likely take this thread in a whole other direction. The pro-abortion people would have us believe that life doesn't become human until completely free of the womb. Adherents of the Jewish faith would have it when the heart first beats around 22 days after fertilization. Adherents of the Catholic faith would have it at the time of conception.

With medical science continuing to make the babies viable at earlier and earlier times, the pro-abortion position becomes more and more difficult to defend.

Reply
Jan 5, 2013 12:12:12   #
Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.
 
PrairieSeasons wrote:
yhtomit wrote:
tschmath wrote:
yhtomit wrote:
What type of egg are you talking about tschmath?


Are you serious? Or are you trying to make some sort of joke? I'm tKing about a fertilized human egg.


So...if this fertilized egg is indeed alive and developing,has life begun at this point?


An interesting question that will likely take this thread in a whole other direction. The pro-abortion people would have us believe that life doesn't become human until completely free of the womb. Adherents of the Jewish faith would have it when the heart first beats around 22 days after fertilization. Adherents of the Catholic faith would have it at the time of conception.

With medical science continuing to make the babies viable at earlier and earlier times, the pro-abortion position becomes more and more difficult to defend.
quote=yhtomit quote=tschmath quote=yhtomit What... (show quote)


Absolutely agree, there is a point during a pregnancy that abortion becomes murder, no matter your religious belief or lack there of.... So many libs bemoan the death penalty for cold blooded murders, yet have no problem with the slaughter of an innocent infant!

Reply
Jan 5, 2013 18:09:40   #
Michael O' Loc: Midwest right now
 
Timothy and Blurryeyed : Yes, the scientific question has now evolved to "when does the human life begin ?" Religiously, we know. For the atheist it is easy to say "birth", as if that little bundle of life was a clump of NOTHING until popping out of the birth canal. As we are all well aware, the courts are slowly being pushed to face reality on this question too. I wonder how long it will take before the unborn are treated as kindly as released and forgiven adult killers ? We are a strange and self-centered society.

Reply
 
 
Jan 6, 2013 10:47:44   #
yhtomit Loc: Port Land. Oregon
 
When I first started learning about biology, we were taught about the "life cycle" of a creature.It always started with conception and always ended in death.Life never started a couple of weeks or months later .In science life begins at conception,everything else is a political contortion of science.I'm off to my weekly blood letting.Cheers.

Reply
Jan 6, 2013 10:54:51   #
Screamin Scott Loc: Marshfield Wi, Baltimore Md, now Dallas Ga
 
You have to have that too?

yhtomit wrote:
When I first started learning about biology, we were taught about the "life cycle" of a creature.It always started with conception and always ended in death.Life never started a couple of weeks or months later .In science life begins at conception,everything else is a political contortion of science.I'm off to my weekly blood letting.Cheers.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 13 of 13
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.