Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
affectations in photo terminology
Page <<first <prev 10 of 10
Jan 4, 2013 09:41:53   #
bkyser Loc: Fly over country in Indiana
 
Photography is nothing, try sailing. I teach sailing to boyscouts. There are no ropes used in sailing, there are sheets (ropes that control the sails), and halyards (to raise the sail) Rode (anchor rope), and stays (wire rope to hold the mast up) Because I'm more interested in the kids learning to love to sail, I do use the word rope.... much to the chagrin of the old salts that think the kids must spend their time studying the differences between the tacks based on wind direction, or the front bottom of a sail, also called the tack. Getting all wrapped up in fancy terms takes away from the fun that gets newbies interested in lots of hobbies.
That being said, I actually don't think photography is nearly as bad as some special interests when it comes to wierd terms.

Reply
Jan 9, 2013 16:45:37   #
Old Redeye Loc: San Mateo, CA
 
Yeah, I like to use abreviations so I don't have to talk or write so long. Hence: Photograph = ph, shutter = sh and aperture = ap. Unfortunately others have started using those tems in other arenas. The nerve!!!
jerryc41 wrote:
buckwheat wrote:
In another thread someone mentioned "glass" as the worst affectation in terminology. I would like to know what other people think, because my pet peeve is referring to a photo as a "capture".
"Bokeh" is another one, and as the teenagers who are too lazy to learn the language take over, I'm sure it will get worse.
What is your peeve?

I think people are trying to avoid using the same words all the time. For example, we are stuck with "photography" and "photograph." They're big words to say and big words to type. I use photo, image, and pic frequently, just to break it up.

As for bokeh, that's a legitimate term that has a legitimate use, and some people care about it more than others.

"Glass" might seem like an affectation, but we all get the idea. Of course when you pay $2,000 for a lens, there is a lot more quality in there than just the glass itself, so it's not only the glass that produces a better image.

It's like car people calling a transmission a tranny, or calling a Corvette a Vette. It's shorthand used by people involved in the activity. One thing I don't understand is the compulsion to call an engine a motor. All the vehicle shows I watch on TV use "motor."

So, Im OK with all that photographic affectation.
quote=buckwheat In another thread someone mention... (show quote)

Reply
Page <<first <prev 10 of 10
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.