Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Gallery
Food Photoshoot #4
Page 1 of 2 next>
Dec 15, 2012 12:39:09   #
Stef C Loc: Conshohocken (near philly) PA
 
These are from my latest menu items shoot at Plenty, a restaurant on Passyunk ave. in the heart of South Philadelphia..

Hope you're not hungry. Please feel free to give any c&c, hopefully i'm getting better..













I'm on the fence with this one, i like the lighting AND i hate it. Opinions?
I'm on the fence with this one, i like the lightin...

Reply
Dec 15, 2012 12:57:34   #
Stef C Loc: Conshohocken (near philly) PA
 
.



Reply
Dec 15, 2012 12:59:18   #
Brendan Loc: Cornwall
 
yes i am hungry and that last pic has sent me crazy.......was stroking the cat at the time ,its now minus 1 ear.......

Reply
 
 
Dec 15, 2012 13:13:03   #
mooseeyes Loc: Sonora, California
 
Well, my hunger alarm just went off. . .time for some breakfast!

Reply
Dec 15, 2012 13:40:25   #
Nikonian72 Loc: Chico CA
 
Will these images be printed?

I ask, because printing will expand the contrast, and the hot spots in images #1, 3, 5, & 7 may block-up in print.

Reply
Dec 15, 2012 13:47:04   #
Stef C Loc: Conshohocken (near philly) PA
 
nah, just web! That's a good tip though. Are you saying to optimize for printing i'd have to bring those highlights down? (I left them so washed out, because that's the style they like)

Reply
Dec 15, 2012 17:26:44   #
Izza1967 Loc: Bristol, England
 
I do like these images, just one question, why the high ISO?

Reply
 
 
Dec 15, 2012 19:46:51   #
Stef C Loc: Conshohocken (near philly) PA
 
Izza1967 wrote:
I do like these images, just one question, why the high ISO?


Cause the light was much darker than the images look, and I was just using natural light.

Plus, I think that it doesn't really like that noisy at all.. it looks pretty good for 1000 to me

Reply
Dec 16, 2012 04:19:38   #
Izza1967 Loc: Bristol, England
 
They look very good for the higher ISO but take your first pic at ISO 500 and shutter speed of 3200 and second at ISO 1000 and shutter speed of 4000. They could esily have been taken at a lower ISO which, so I have read, gives better colour saturation.

I am not trying to say you are wrong for what you have done it's just something I wouldn't have thought to do myself and want to learn more about others techniques so as to improve my own :)

Reply
Dec 16, 2012 07:23:15   #
bullwinkle Loc: New Hartford, Missouri
 
Wow, did you eat all that? Breakfast sure is sounding good right now. Like the half muffin best.

Reply
Dec 16, 2012 08:33:37   #
GrahamS Loc: Hertfordshire, U.K
 
Your lighting is far too harsh. Try a couple of reflectors - pieces of white card will do - and experiment. Use a tripod, aperture priority and an aperture of f16. A low ISO will improve your image quality as well.

Reply
 
 
Dec 16, 2012 08:36:16   #
rlaugh Loc: Michigan & Florida
 
Nice shots and not a calorie in the bunch!!

Reply
Dec 16, 2012 10:14:46   #
Stef C Loc: Conshohocken (near philly) PA
 
GrahamS wrote:
Your lighting is far too harsh. Try a couple of reflectors - pieces of white card will do - and experiment. Use a tripod, aperture priority and an aperture of f16. A low ISO will improve your image quality as well.


But i don't want to be shooting at F/16 on a tripod. They want artsy blurry backgrounds and blown out highlight, so why whould I shoot at F/16?

As their client, i'm going to get that look for them.. Everywhere that's supposed to be in focus is (i hope, with a few exceptions) Thank you for looking though!

Reply
Dec 16, 2012 10:16:10   #
Stef C Loc: Conshohocken (near philly) PA
 
Izza1967 wrote:
They look very good for the higher ISO but take your first pic at ISO 500 and shutter speed of 3200 and second at ISO 1000 and shutter speed of 4000. They could esily have been taken at a lower ISO which, so I have read, gives better colour saturation.

I am not trying to say you are wrong for what you have done it's just something I wouldn't have thought to do myself and want to learn more about others techniques so as to improve my own :)


Yeah you're right. I'm looking through my image and I went as low as 500, and as high as 1600. I could've easily brought a monopod too. Next time!

Reply
Dec 16, 2012 10:18:11   #
Stef C Loc: Conshohocken (near philly) PA
 
Izza- I have a question for you. I assume when you clicked "download" you were able to see the High Iso. When it's loading on your screen, does it seem especially noisy until it completely loads? On my computer, it looks like it was at about ISO 6,400 before finished loading then it all smooths out. Just curious

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.