Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Sports Photography section of our forum.
Photo Gallery
Is this an improvement or is it over the top?
Dec 15, 2012 09:47:04   #
drydock Loc: mackay, queensland australia
 
I took this pic of a sulphur crested cockatoo the other day and was pretty happy with the result. However-- I was fooling around on the computer and found a free plugin for lightroom called Perfect effects 4, downloaded it and applied a preset called tonal contrast to the image. I think the results are very pleasing, giving almost a 3D effect without the grainy appearance of HDR.

I wold be interested in the opinions of UHH members as to whether they prefer the original or the PE4 version

original image
original image...

pe4 image
pe4 image...

Reply
Dec 15, 2012 10:06:46   #
macawman Loc: Long Island New York
 
I like the second one better more feather detail.

Reply
Dec 15, 2012 10:53:16   #
DigitalDon Loc: Calgary, Alberta
 
The second one is better because of the light. If you haven't adjusted the light, it looks like all the plugin does is actually brighten the darks and also applies sharpening. The program didn't seem to add any noise but then you had a nice clean pic to begin with.

Reply
 
 
Dec 15, 2012 11:08:59   #
JR1 Loc: Tavistock, Devon, UK
 
Looks fine to me more detail

Reply
Dec 15, 2012 11:13:28   #
Horseart Loc: Alabama
 
drydock wrote:
I took this pic of a sulphur crested cockatoo the other day and was pretty happy with the result. However-- I was fooling around on the computer and found a free plugin for lightroom called Perfect effects 4, downloaded it and applied a preset called tonal contrast to the image. I think the results are very pleasing, giving almost a 3D effect without the grainy appearance of HDR.

I wold be interested in the opinions of UHH members as to whether they prefer the original or the PE4 version


#2 beautiful bird, beautiful photo. I am a bird lover with 2 silly parrots!!!

Reply
Dec 15, 2012 11:27:08   #
Vincent Loc: St. Petersburg, FL
 
Number 2 does it, but then again what does a nut know? They are nice!

Reply
Dec 15, 2012 21:02:39   #
jeanbug35 Loc: Jonesboro AR
 
I like the 2nd one.

Reply
Check out Infrared Photography section of our forum.
Dec 16, 2012 08:03:41   #
Al FR-153 Loc: Chicago Suburbs
 
#2 appears sharper. They did it by adding noise to sharpen the edges, which you can easily see in the fine feathers to the lower left of the eye. They took it just a hair over the edge for me, but then I do my own in CS5 and dislike seeing noise. For automation, it appears good. If you are doing it yourself, I would back off the sharpening just a hair.

Reply
Dec 16, 2012 10:50:51   #
Treepusher Loc: Kingston, Massachusetts
 
Another vote for number two, improving an already good photo.

Reply
Dec 16, 2012 11:06:08   #
JC56 Loc: Lake St.Louis mo.
 
Nice photo....but 2 looks a little over sharp...jmo.

Reply
Dec 16, 2012 13:55:44   #
SoHillGuy Loc: Washington
 
The second one seems to be an improvement, however the post processing induced a green fringe along the right side of the Cockatoo

Reply
Check out Photo Critique Section section of our forum.
Feb 8, 2013 08:40:37   #
steve6 Loc: Hull MA.
 
beautiful job ,you can print mine any time. by.

Reply
Feb 8, 2013 08:43:17   #
angler Loc: StHelens England
 
Very nice,number 2 is an imrovement,but i liked number 1 as well.

Reply
Feb 8, 2013 08:44:53   #
Bret Loc: Dayton Ohio
 
Much better job with the p/p....just keep this in mind...less is almost always more...go to far with it and it starts looking "cooked"...nice shot btw.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out The Dynamics of Photographic Lighting section of our forum.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.