A few months ago I bought a Canon S100 P & S camera because it was listed at f/2 at the widest aperture among other attractive features. I couldn't afford a DSLR and I was determined to get a high quality small camera with large aperture so I could take some portraits of my grandchildren. I thought that the f/2 would produce shallow depth of field and thus blurred backgrounds. This proved to be WRONG!
After puzzling over it for some time and reading to find the answer, I located this statement in Bryan Peterson's book "Understanding Exposure":
"Your fixed-lens camera is hopelessly plagued with an uncanny ability to render a tremendous amount of depth of field, even when you set your lens to f/2.8---an aperture of f/2.8 is equivalent to an aperture opening of f/11 on an SLR camera! And when you're at f/4, you're able to record a depth of field equivalent to f/16. At f/5.6, you're equivalent to f/22. At f/8 , you're equivalent to f/32, and if your lens goes to f/11, you're equivalent to a whopping f/64! Those of us who use SLRs can only dream of the vast depth of field that would result from apertures like f/64." Then later on he says: "So, is there a downside to these fixed-zoom-lens digital cameras? Yes, there is: you can't be nearly as succesful when shooting 'singular-theme/isolation' compositions. Even with your lens set to telephoto length and your aperture wide open, you'll struggle with most attempts to render a background that remains muted and out of focus. Remember, even wide open---at f/2.8 for example--- you still have a depth of field equivalent to f/11 on an SLR."
Wow! I didn't know that. Now, although I have a fine small camera for many things, I can't do what I wanted to do. Arrgggh!!
---Beagleman
Thanks for the information Beagleman. That explains why I have never been able to get blurred backgrounds with my Canon A640.
Hopefully this will help others make the decision between P&S or DSLR, if like you they want to to get blurred backgrounds. I needed mine originally purely for record purposes on a course I was doing so was not bothered about background blur. Since then it has been a different matter. However, I also have DSLRs so can get blur when needed.
It looks like you could be a candidate for a 'bridge camera'. On my Canon SX40, I am able to do photographs that blur the background- although not as we'll as my DSLR. There are other P & S and 'bridge cameras' that can also do this.
as far as I know the reason for this problem is cos the nodel point on the lens is so closeto the sensor.. for point and shoot people on a holiday its a ideal camera nearly anything you point it at will be in focus.
You may be able to solve your problem using post processing. There are programs, old age kicks in, which I can't remember that can selectively defocus areas of your picture. It's too early for my mind to be working, but I know it can be done PP.
Found the program - Focal Point 2 by OnOne Software :thumbup:
Beagleman wrote:
A few months ago I bought a Canon S100 P & S camera because it was listed at f/2 at the widest aperture among other attractive features. I couldn't afford a DSLR and I was determined to get a high quality small camera with large aperture so I could take some portraits of my grandchildren. I thought that the f/2 would produce shallow depth of field and thus blurred backgrounds. This proved to be WRONG!
After puzzling over it for some time and reading to find the answer, I located this statement in Bryan Peterson's book "Understanding Exposure":
"Your fixed-lens camera is hopelessly plagued with an uncanny ability to render a tremendous amount of depth of field, even when you set your lens to f/2.8---an aperture of f/2.8 is equivalent to an aperture opening of f/11 on an SLR camera! And when you're at f/4, you're able to record a depth of field equivalent to f/16. At f/5.6, you're equivalent to f/22. At f/8 , you're equivalent to f/32, and if your lens goes to f/11, you're equivalent to a whopping f/64! Those of us who use SLRs can only dream of the vast depth of field that would result from apertures like f/64." Then later on he says: "So, is there a downside to these fixed-zoom-lens digital cameras? Yes, there is: you can't be nearly as succesful when shooting 'singular-theme/isolation' compositions. Even with your lens set to telephoto length and your aperture wide open, you'll struggle with most attempts to render a background that remains muted and out of focus. Remember, even wide open---at f/2.8 for example--- you still have a depth of field equivalent to f/11 on an SLR."
Wow! I didn't know that. Now, although I have a fine small camera for many things, I can't do what I wanted to do. Arrgggh!!
---Beagleman
A few months ago I bought a Canon S100 P & S c... (
show quote)
P&S cameras are meant for users who don't even know what depth of field means and never heard the phrase. If you want all the abilities of a Bridge or dSLR - you have to buy a Bridge or dSLR. You haven't been cheated by anyone but yourself! :?
Thanks everyone for your responses. I guess I just needed to share my frustration (as marco marks put it) with myself.
---Beagleman
KERO
Loc: Richmond, Va.
You have got to be kidding me. I just order the Canon S110 on Wednesday to get control of the DOF that my little Nikon cool pix won't give me. Tell me I didn't just waste $400.00.
Beagleman wrote:
Thanks everyone for your responses. I guess I just needed to share my frustration (as marco marks put it) with myself.
---Beagleman
Actually, I think you informed a couple of people of something they didn't know. Ignore the snarky responses..almost every post gets a least one for some reason.
Beagleman wrote:
A few months ago I bought a Canon S100 P & S camera because it was listed at f/2 at the widest aperture among other attractive features. I couldn't afford a DSLR and I was determined to get a high quality small camera with large aperture so I could take some portraits of my grandchildren. I thought that the f/2 would produce shallow depth of field and thus blurred backgrounds. This proved to be WRONG!
After puzzling over it for some time and reading to find the answer, I located this statement in Bryan Peterson's book "Understanding Exposure":
"Your fixed-lens camera is hopelessly plagued with an uncanny ability to render a tremendous amount of depth of field, even when you set your lens to f/2.8---an aperture of f/2.8 is equivalent to an aperture opening of f/11 on an SLR camera! And when you're at f/4, you're able to record a depth of field equivalent to f/16. At f/5.6, you're equivalent to f/22. At f/8 , you're equivalent to f/32, and if your lens goes to f/11, you're equivalent to a whopping f/64! Those of us who use SLRs can only dream of the vast depth of field that would result from apertures like f/64." Then later on he says: "So, is there a downside to these fixed-zoom-lens digital cameras? Yes, there is: you can't be nearly as succesful when shooting 'singular-theme/isolation' compositions. Even with your lens set to telephoto length and your aperture wide open, you'll struggle with most attempts to render a background that remains muted and out of focus. Remember, even wide open---at f/2.8 for example--- you still have a depth of field equivalent to f/11 on an SLR."
Wow! I didn't know that. Now, although I have a fine small camera for many things, I can't do what I wanted to do. Arrgggh!!
---Beagleman
A few months ago I bought a Canon S100 P & S c... (
show quote)
The good news is that most people don't complain about blurred images from such cameras.
Wow, I learned something today. I didn't know this about point and shoot cameras. Thanks for the info.
KERO
Loc: Richmond, Va.
D & H says:
With its 5x Optical Zoom, the S110's 24-120mm equivalent lens has a bright f/2.0 aperture, which is ideal for low-light conditions or using a shallow depth-of-field for pleasing, defocused background effects. These benefits also translate into the Full HD video captured by the camera, providing the same desirable background effects, and excellent zoom for close-ups of your subject.
My little Sony DSC-WX50 has a portrait mode that does blur the background.
Sweet!
raynardo wrote:
My little Sony DSC-WX50 has a portrait mode that does blur the background.
Sweet!
It probably has a larger sensor and/or maximum aperture.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.