Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Pick only two Nikon primes for Dx
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
Dec 2, 2012 22:13:46   #
Finch585 Loc: Northern California
 
If you Nikon DX shooters could have only two primes for general photography (not sports or birding) what FL would you take?

I'm thinking 35mm (for a normal view) and 85mm (for bokeh shots).

You?

Best,
Jeffrey

Reply
Dec 2, 2012 22:20:01   #
Nikonian72 Loc: Chico CA
 
Bokeh? Really? You are concerned with bokeh as a primary function of a lens?

Just about any cheap lens will provide "bokeh". Just get a manual lens of f/2 or larger. It don't even have to be sharp!

Reply
Dec 2, 2012 22:21:10   #
lighthouse Loc: No Fixed Abode
 
Finch585 wrote:
If you Nikon DX shooters could have only two primes for general photography (not sports or birding) what FL would you take?

I'm thinking 35mm (for a normal view) and 85mm (for bokeh shots).

You?

Best,
Jeffrey


What other lenses do you have?

Reply
 
 
Dec 2, 2012 23:00:32   #
Finch585 Loc: Northern California
 
Nikonian72 wrote:
Bokeh? Really? You are concerned with bokeh as a primary function of a lens?

Just about any cheap lens will provide "bokeh". Just get a manual lens of f/2 or larger. It don't even have to be sharp!


Well, yes, mostly for portraiture. I should have written "background blur" instead of just bokeh. That's why I bought the 85mm f/1.8.

Reply
Dec 2, 2012 23:03:46   #
Finch585 Loc: Northern California
 
lighthouse wrote:
Finch585 wrote:
If you Nikon DX shooters could have only two primes for general photography (not sports or birding) what FL would you take?

I'm thinking 35mm (for a normal view) and 85mm (for bokeh shots).

You?

Best,
Jeffrey


What other lenses do you have?



17-55mm f/2.8G, love it, but enjoying the primes.
Wondering how wide to go if I get another prime (for D7000) and what you all like.

J.

Reply
Dec 2, 2012 23:04:55   #
Db7423 Loc: Pittsburgh, PA
 
Not knowing what lens you currently have and what you like to shoot will limit us the ability to give you good answers to your question. However, my favorite lens on DX was a nifty-fifty so that would be my firt choice. An 85 mm may also be a good choice as well.

Reply
Dec 2, 2012 23:09:24   #
GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City
 
I think I'd get a the 85 ( I have an older f/2) and a 24, just 'cause I like things a bit wider. Back when I shot film, my "normal" lens was the 35mm f2. The 24 is the DX equivalent.
I do love my 17-55. Fantastic DX lens.

Reply
 
 
Dec 2, 2012 23:25:58   #
Finch585 Loc: Northern California
 
Db7423 wrote:
Not knowing what lens you currently have and what you like to shoot will limit us the ability to give you good answers to your question. However, my favorite lens on DX was a nifty-fifty so that would be my firt choice. An 85 mm may also be a good choice as well.


Ok, sorry, I was trying to take a poll of what two primes everyone else already likes on DX, especially wide, regardless of my criteria :-) if they could only have two (you know stuck on a desert island...)
but I shoot everything but wildlife and sports, so don't feel i need a super-tele, and I currently have:

35mm f/1.8G
85mm f/1.8D (love the aperture ring)
17-55mm f/2.8G

I shelved the kit 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 G and wondering how wide others would commit to as a practical prime.

Reply
Dec 2, 2012 23:31:44   #
lighthouse Loc: No Fixed Abode
 
Finch585 wrote:
Db7423 wrote:
Not knowing what lens you currently have and what you like to shoot will limit us the ability to give you good answers to your question. However, my favorite lens on DX was a nifty-fifty so that would be my firt choice. An 85 mm may also be a good choice as well.


Ok, sorry, I was trying to take a poll of what two primes everyone else already likes on DX, especially wide, regardless of my criteria :-) if they could only have two (you know stuck on a desert island...)
but I shoot everything but wildlife and sports, so don't feel i need a super-tele, and I currently have:

35mm f/1.8G
85mm f/1.8D (love the aperture ring)
17-55mm f/2.8G

I shelved the kit 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 G and wondering how wide others would commit to as a practical prime.
quote=Db7423 Not knowing what lens you currently ... (show quote)


100mm macro
and 21mm Zeiss

Reply
Dec 2, 2012 23:46:57   #
GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City
 
lighthouse wrote:

100mm macro
and 21mm Zeiss


oooooh, oooooh, Can I change my 24 to a 21mm Zeiss?
I'm droolin' here.

Reply
Dec 2, 2012 23:58:42   #
Finch585 Loc: Northern California
 
GoofyNewfie wrote:
lighthouse wrote:

100mm macro
and 21mm Zeiss


oooooh, oooooh, Can I change my 24 to a 21mm Zeiss?
I'm droolin' here.


no, no, no boys... the OP (me ;-) said "Nikon"

(meesa can't afford Zeiss or Leica ;-)

Reply
 
 
Dec 3, 2012 02:28:10   #
lighthouse Loc: No Fixed Abode
 
Nope, OP said Nikon camera, said nothing about Nikon glass.

Reply
Dec 3, 2012 02:42:29   #
Finch585 Loc: Northern California
 
lighthouse wrote:
Nope, OP said Nikon camera, said nothing about Nikon glass.


Well, half correct, in the title I asked "pick only two Nikon primes for DX...."
;-)

Reply
Dec 3, 2012 03:15:04   #
lighthouse Loc: No Fixed Abode
 
Finch585 wrote:
lighthouse wrote:
Nope, OP said Nikon camera, said nothing about Nikon glass.


Well, half correct, in the title I asked "pick only two Nikon primes for DX...."
;-)


Damn! So you did.

105mm f/2.8G ED-IF AF-S VR Lens
24mm f/1.4 AF-S G

Reply
Dec 3, 2012 06:32:03   #
Beagleman Loc: Indiana
 
Finch585, how are 'ya gonna charge the camera batteries if you're on a desert island?

---Beagleman

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.