If you Nikon DX shooters could have only two primes for general photography (not sports or birding) what FL would you take?
I'm thinking 35mm (for a normal view) and 85mm (for bokeh shots).
You?
Best,
Jeffrey
Bokeh? Really? You are concerned with bokeh as a primary function of a lens?
Just about any cheap lens will provide "bokeh". Just get a manual lens of f/2 or larger. It don't even have to be sharp!
Finch585 wrote:
If you Nikon DX shooters could have only two primes for general photography (not sports or birding) what FL would you take?
I'm thinking 35mm (for a normal view) and 85mm (for bokeh shots).
You?
Best,
Jeffrey
What other lenses do you have?
Nikonian72 wrote:
Bokeh? Really? You are concerned with bokeh as a primary function of a lens?
Just about any cheap lens will provide "bokeh". Just get a manual lens of f/2 or larger. It don't even have to be sharp!
Well, yes, mostly for portraiture. I should have written "background blur" instead of just bokeh. That's why I bought the 85mm f/1.8.
lighthouse wrote:
Finch585 wrote:
If you Nikon DX shooters could have only two primes for general photography (not sports or birding) what FL would you take?
I'm thinking 35mm (for a normal view) and 85mm (for bokeh shots).
You?
Best,
Jeffrey
What other lenses do you have?
17-55mm f/2.8G, love it, but enjoying the primes.
Wondering how wide to go if I get another prime (for D7000) and what you all like.
J.
Not knowing what lens you currently have and what you like to shoot will limit us the ability to give you good answers to your question. However, my favorite lens on DX was a nifty-fifty so that would be my firt choice. An 85 mm may also be a good choice as well.
I think I'd get a the 85 ( I have an older f/2) and a 24, just 'cause I like things a bit wider. Back when I shot film, my "normal" lens was the 35mm f2. The 24 is the DX equivalent.
I do love my 17-55. Fantastic DX lens.
Db7423 wrote:
Not knowing what lens you currently have and what you like to shoot will limit us the ability to give you good answers to your question. However, my favorite lens on DX was a nifty-fifty so that would be my firt choice. An 85 mm may also be a good choice as well.
Ok, sorry, I was trying to take a poll of what two primes everyone else already likes on DX, especially wide, regardless of my criteria :-) if they could only have two (you know stuck on a desert island...)
but I shoot everything but wildlife and sports, so don't feel i need a super-tele, and I currently have:
35mm f/1.8G
85mm f/1.8D (love the aperture ring)
17-55mm f/2.8G
I shelved the kit 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 G and wondering how wide others would commit to as a practical prime.
lighthouse wrote:
100mm macro
and 21mm Zeiss
oooooh, oooooh, Can I change my 24 to a 21mm Zeiss?
I'm droolin' here.
GoofyNewfie wrote:
lighthouse wrote:
100mm macro
and 21mm Zeiss
oooooh, oooooh, Can I change my 24 to a 21mm Zeiss?
I'm droolin' here.
no, no, no boys... the OP (me ;-) said "Nikon"
(meesa can't afford Zeiss or Leica ;-)
Nope, OP said Nikon camera, said nothing about Nikon glass.
lighthouse wrote:
Nope, OP said Nikon camera, said nothing about Nikon glass.
Well, half correct, in the title I asked "pick only two Nikon primes for DX...."
;-)
Finch585 wrote:
lighthouse wrote:
Nope, OP said Nikon camera, said nothing about Nikon glass.
Well, half correct, in the title I asked "pick only two Nikon primes for DX...."
;-)
Damn! So you did.
105mm f/2.8G ED-IF AF-S VR Lens
24mm f/1.4 AF-S G
Finch585, how are 'ya gonna charge the camera batteries if you're on a desert island?
---Beagleman
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.