Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Do you include feet?
Page 1 of 5 next> last>>
Dec 2, 2012 00:42:26   #
robert-photos Loc: Chicago
 
In your group photos do you include the feet and lower body of the subjects and why?

Should be an interesting discussion. :P

Reply
Dec 2, 2012 03:46:21   #
lighthouse Loc: No Fixed Abode
 
Most of the time.
Because it is usually connected to their torso.

Reply
Dec 2, 2012 06:12:21   #
JR1 Loc: Tavistock, Devon, UK
 
lighthouse wrote:
Most of the time.
Because it is usually connected to their torso.


A true and obvious answer

Reply
 
 
Dec 2, 2012 12:32:29   #
robert-photos Loc: Chicago
 
lighthouse wrote:
Most of the time.
Because it is usually connected to their torso.


When you look at a group photo how often do you study their feet rather than their faces?

So the question is "Why include the feet when they don't usually add to the photo?"

It is a question about composition, not connectivity. :roll:

Reply
Dec 2, 2012 12:38:35   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
robert-photos wrote:
In your group photos do you include the feet and lower body of the subjects and why?

Should be an interesting discussion. :P

Include feet in the U. S. and meters in the UK.

Reply
Dec 2, 2012 12:46:01   #
LouEllen
 
I was asked to take photos for our church calendar and they are including some group shots for different ministries. While photographing one group, I was asked if people would be able to see their feet. There was quite a bit of laughing when I responded that ALL I was photographing was their feet b/c I thought it would make a very interesting photo.

But to answer the question, there were no feet in the shot. Too many people to include feet. I wanted something closer and more intimate. I still like the idea of only feet, though. LOL

Lou Ellen

robert-photos wrote:
In your group photos do you include the feet and lower body of the subjects and why?

Should be an interesting discussion. :P

Reply
Dec 2, 2012 12:46:50   #
hlmichel Loc: New Hope, Minnesota
 
jerryc41 wrote:
robert-photos wrote:
In your group photos do you include the feet and lower body of the subjects and why?

Should be an interesting discussion. :P

Include feet in the U. S. and meters in the UK.


LOL!!!

Reply
 
 
Dec 2, 2012 12:49:55   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
robert-photos wrote:
In your group photos do you include the feet and lower body of the subjects and why?

Should be an interesting discussion. :P

Yes, usually. It looks more natural, and it's not like a close-up photo of the individuals. Sometimes, people want the close-up effect, so I concentrate on waist-up. I give them the choice.

Reply
Dec 2, 2012 12:53:48   #
robert-photos Loc: Chicago
 
LouEllen wrote:
I was asked to take photos for our church calendar and they are including some group shots for different ministries. While photographing one group, I was asked if people would be able to see their feet. There was quite a bit of laughing when I responded that ALL I was photographing was their feet b/c I thought it would make a very interesting photo.

But to answer the question, there were no feet in the shot. Too many people to include feet. I wanted something closer and more intimate. I still like the idea of only feet, though. LOL

Lou Ellen

robert-photos wrote:
In your group photos do you include the feet and lower body of the subjects and why?

Should be an interesting discussion. :P
I was asked to take photos for our church calendar... (show quote)


I agree, as I have done that on occassion. Once in Prague I sat in the town square and took photos of passing feet for more than two hours. An interesting study. (but perhaps they were passing meters :lol: )

Reply
Dec 2, 2012 13:01:59   #
Scubie Loc: Brunswick Georgia
 
I use as much of a person as possible. The rule is to us a midpoint of a leg.....It does not look natural to me.....Example try to pose a person with their legs pulled up to their chest...When you use two people, use the triangle pose if possible....

Reply
Dec 2, 2012 13:04:19   #
robert-photos Loc: Chicago
 
Scubie wrote:
I use as much of a person as possible. The rule is to us a midpoint of a leg.....It does not look natural to me.....Example try to pose a person with their legs pulled up to their chest...When you use two people, use the triangle pose if possible....


I'm trying to understand so could you post an example?

Reply
 
 
Dec 2, 2012 13:06:34   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
robert-photos wrote:
Once in Prague I sat in the town square and took photos of passing feet for more than two hours. An interesting study. (but perhaps they were passing meters :lol: )

In Prague, it would definitely be meters. Of course, for little kids, it would be more like centemeters.

Reply
Dec 2, 2012 14:26:38   #
tlbuljac Loc: Oklahoma
 
hahaha good answer
lighthouse wrote:
Most of the time.
Because it is usually connected to their torso.

Reply
Dec 3, 2012 05:49:38   #
radiumjohn Loc: Pulaski, Virginia, USA
 
jerryc41 wrote:
robert-photos wrote:
In your group photos do you include the feet and lower body of the subjects and why?

Should be an interesting discussion. :P

Include feet in the U. S. and meters in the UK.


Who wants to look at gas, electric, and water meters?

Reply
Dec 3, 2012 06:24:44   #
PhotoGator Loc: Florida
 
robert-photos wrote:
In your group photos do you include the feet and lower body of the subjects and why?

Should be an interesting discussion. :P


Show the entire body in some and crop to waist level in others and below knee in others.
Side view of individuals make then look thinner.

Reply
Page 1 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.