Swiss Village
Dec 1, 2012 16:18:12 #
Dec 1, 2012 16:22:43 #
Dec 1, 2012 16:50:12 #
dachs wrote:
had it been high definition , great; as it is (with the web limitations) yes fine but....
It was shot with a Minolta 105i on Fuji 400 in 2001 before digital and scanned in from a 4x6 matte finish print
Dec 1, 2012 17:08:32 #
tad1937 wrote:
It was shot with a Minolta 105i on Fuji 400 in 2001 before digital and scanned in from a 4x6 matte finish print
dachs wrote:
had it been high definition , great; as it is (with the web limitations) yes fine but....
It was shot with a Minolta 105i on Fuji 400 in 2001 before digital and scanned in from a 4x6 matte finish print
in that case, marvellous! Love the old Minoltas,, way under-rated
Dec 1, 2012 19:43:42 #
dachs wrote:
in that case, marvellous! Love the old Minoltas,, way under-rated
tad1937 wrote:
It was shot with a Minolta 105i on Fuji 400 in 2001 before digital and scanned in from a 4x6 matte finish print
dachs wrote:
had it been high definition , great; as it is (with the web limitations) yes fine but....
It was shot with a Minolta 105i on Fuji 400 in 2001 before digital and scanned in from a 4x6 matte finish print
in that case, marvellous! Love the old Minoltas,, way under-rated
yes they were, do they make them anymore??
Dec 2, 2012 11:06:41 #
Great scenery and nice photo. Would you ever get used to seeing that every day? I'd never get anything done for all the open-mouthed gawking!
Dec 2, 2012 13:54:00 #
Treepusher wrote:
Great scenery and nice photo. Would you ever get used to seeing that every day? I'd never get anything done for all the open-mouthed gawking!
You are so right !! It is all around you, you don't know where to look. I so wish I had digital then and knew immediately what kind of shot I got. I would have taken hundreds.
Dec 2, 2012 14:40:16 #
tad1937 wrote:
yes they were, do they make them anymore??
dachs wrote:
in that case, marvellous! Love the old Minoltas,, way under-rated
tad1937 wrote:
It was shot with a Minolta 105i on Fuji 400 in 2001 before digital and scanned in from a 4x6 matte finish print
dachs wrote:
had it been high definition , great; as it is (with the web limitations) yes fine but....
It was shot with a Minolta 105i on Fuji 400 in 2001 before digital and scanned in from a 4x6 matte finish print
in that case, marvellous! Love the old Minoltas,, way under-rated
yes they were, do they make them anymore??
sony took over Konica-Minolta so it has not the same ethos as it used to - the designers laboured to give amateurs top end pro features at a decent (relative) price but I guess those guys long since retired. Minolta XG (XE on the States) even had an eyepiece window shutter for long exposures, brilliant brick of a tool, nock in nails solid, half the price of a Nikon.
Rokkor glass was amongst the best too, at one time.
Ah well, mine's in the cupboard gathering dust, shame
Dec 2, 2012 17:39:27 #
dachs wrote:
quote=tad1937 quote=dachs quote=tad1937 quote=... (show quote)
I had another firefighter I worked with who had several Minoltas and loved them and got great results with them
Dec 3, 2012 16:33:54 #
Dec 4, 2012 11:32:19 #
dstead wrote:
you should go go back!
Thank you very much, and if I was physically able to do so , believe me I would. At this point shooting the mountains of Tennessee will have to suffice. As I go through my prints I see so many places I wish I could go back to with the digital.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.