Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Gallery
Lets see those eclipse photos
Page 1 of 2 next>
Apr 8, 2024 16:26:54   #
avflinsch Loc: Hamilton, New Jersey
 
Nikon D500
Sigma 150-600 @600
1/3200 f8.0
ND1000 filter - we had lots of cloud cover, so I could get away with the ND1000


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
Apr 8, 2024 17:13:24   #
freediver808 Loc: Hawaii
 
avflinsch wrote:
Nikon D500
Sigma 150-600 @600
1/3200 f8.0
ND1000 filter - we had lots of cloud cover, so I could get away with the ND1000



Solar Filter n24-120 F4 at F8, ISO 200, 1/250


(Download)

Reply
Apr 8, 2024 17:40:26   #
JR69 Loc: Wolverine Michigan
 
Boy are you guys quick. I was south od Lima Ohio and mine are still in the camera. Need to go to dinner before I download.

Reply
 
 
Apr 9, 2024 03:01:06   #
24Megapixseal Loc: Kansas
 
Westlake, Texas
Pre and post totality with D3500, AF-P 70-300 Non-VR on tripod with K&F Concept ND100000 filter
Diamond Ring and Bailey's Beads and Totality with D5600, AFP 70-300 VR, no filter


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)




(Download)


(Download)




(Download)


(Download)

Reply
Apr 9, 2024 07:38:05   #
crafterwantabe Loc: Mn
 
Those are all fantastic!

Reply
Apr 9, 2024 08:15:05   #
dbfalconer Loc: Salida CO
 
24Megapixseal wrote:
Westlake, Texas
Pre and post totality with D3500, AF-P 70-300 Non-VR on tripod with K&F Concept ND100000 filter
Diamond Ring and Bailey's Beads and Totality with D5600, AFP 70-300 VR, no filter


Great set.

Reply
Apr 9, 2024 08:38:23   #
tcthome Loc: NJ
 

Reply
 
 
Apr 9, 2024 08:59:36   #
alberio Loc: Casa Grande AZ
 
avflinsch wrote:
Nikon D500
Sigma 150-600 @600
1/3200 f8.0
ND1000 filter - we had lots of cloud cover, so I could get away with the ND1000


I like these, but I bet you weren't impressed with the clouds photo bombing you.

Reply
Apr 9, 2024 09:47:38   #
Bubbee Loc: Aventura, Florida
 
Fabulous!

Reply
Apr 9, 2024 12:09:40   #
BurghByrd Loc: Pittsburgh
 
24Megapixseal wrote:
Westlake, Texas
Pre and post totality with D3500, AF-P 70-300 Non-VR on tripod with K&F Concept ND100000 filter
Diamond Ring and Bailey's Beads and Totality with D5600, AFP 70-300 VR, no filter


Truely outstanding set. You nailed focus and exposure and were rewarded with great images of the flares and lunar surface. Very, very nice.

Reply
Apr 9, 2024 17:45:49   #
24Megapixseal Loc: Kansas
 
Thanks everyone.... I was thinking today, wonder if it's possible to expose for earthshine on the "dark side of the moon".... 😂... It would have to be during full totality, and it would probably blow out the coronasphere... BUT... WOULD IT BE POSSIBLE?!?!?!?

Too bad these don't happen 3 or 4 times a year in the USA, huh?!.... CUZ THEY'RE AWESOME!!!

Reply
 
 
Apr 9, 2024 20:22:37   #
dbfalconer Loc: Salida CO
 
Sample of some shots from Sulphur Springs, TX, eclipse. Struggled to keep track of sun in heavy clouds for a while after 1st contact. Then they cleared for Totality. Sony a7iii Tamron 150-500 ICE ND100000 on tripod. F8 ISO 200. Bracketed. Various shutter speeds. WB Daylight. VERY Difficult to see screen due to reflection. Slightly edited and cropped, resized to post. I hope I added to this Conversation appropriately. (I did not recall having to resize before!) Novice here. Should I edit to "warm up" or leave white? Comments welcome.

DSC8273 1/40
DSC8273  1/40...

DSC8310 1/160
DSC8310 1/160...

DSC8311 1/80
DSC8311  1/80...

DSC8319 1/6
DSC8319  1/6...

DSC8581 1/1600
DSC8581  1/1600...

Reply
Apr 9, 2024 21:03:10   #
alberio Loc: Casa Grande AZ
 
24Megapixseal wrote:
Thanks everyone.... I was thinking today, wonder if it's possible to expose for earthshine on the "dark side of the moon".... 😂... It would have to be during full totality, and it would probably blow out the coronasphere... BUT... WOULD IT BE POSSIBLE?!?!?!?

Too bad these don't happen 3 or 4 times a year in the USA, huh?!.... CUZ THEY'RE AWESOME!!!


Somebody has done something like this, only I think it was a composite.

Reply
Apr 9, 2024 21:09:21   #
BurghByrd Loc: Pittsburgh
 
Here's one from my own efforts and my lessons from it.

The focus was not sharp. I began the session trying to focus on the sun's edge before the moon began to obscure the sun; it was not effective. The edge of the sun is in-distinct and more so if over exposed. Preliminary research on the subject recommended exposing with a spot meter and centering the meter. I believe that resulted in over exposed images and that I would have been better served lowering it down to where sunspots became visible. Sun spots could be used to assist with focus. The edge of the moon could also have been used to good effect particularly with a lower exposure. That was an omission made that should have been done and would have probably been effective or at least an improvement.

The camera was set up in advance for exposure bracketing. The increment was 0.7 EV, 0.3 would have been better. Also, there are two options for bracketing order, Low - nominal - high and nominal - low - high. For a Nikon for exampe, if "apply settings to live view" (d9 is on) and the bracketing order is low - nominal - high the view finder will reflect the under exposed image (number one in the sequence). This can be misleading and “fool” the photographer into an erroneous adjustment to increase the exposure as it did I.

In all it was a worthwhile experience beyond just the photographic challenges and lessons. The environmental changes alone were moving. Cooling and the breezes from it, shadow bands and rainbow colors in the clouds along with the changing quality of light. Those of us who were lucky enough to see it were blessed.



Reply
Apr 9, 2024 21:45:26   #
dbfalconer Loc: Salida CO
 
BurghByrd wrote:
Here's one from my own efforts and my lessons from it.

The focus was not sharp. I began the session trying to focus on the sun's edge before the moon began to obscure the sun; it was not effective. The edge of the sun is in-distinct and more so if over exposed. Preliminary research on the subject recommended exposing with a spot meter and centering the meter. I believe that resulted in over exposed images and that I would have been better served lowering it down to where sunspots became visible. Sun spots could be used to assist with focus. The edge of the moon could also have been used to good effect particularly with a lower exposure. That was an omission made that should have been done and would have probably been effective or at least an improvement.

The camera was set up in advance for exposure bracketing. The increment was 0.7 EV, 0.3 would have been better. Also, there are two options for bracketing order, Low - nominal - high and nominal - low - high. For a Nikon for exampe, if "apply settings to live view" (d9 is on) and the bracketing order is low - nominal - high the view finder will reflect the under exposed image (number one in the sequence). This can be misleading and “fool” the photographer into an erroneous adjustment to increase the exposure as it did I.

In all it was a worthwhile experience beyond just the photographic challenges and lessons. The environmental changes alone were moving. Cooling and the breezes from it, shadow bands and rainbow colors in the clouds along with the changing quality of light. Those of us who were lucky enough to see it were blessed.
Here's one from my own efforts and my lessons from... (show quote)


This is a great shot despite all you might have done differently. I learned a lot with my efforts, too. It was extremely difficult to track the sun with thick clouds before Totality. Reflections on my screen made it almost useless. I bracketed 1.0 with 5 shots. I wish I could remember the experience better—I did not just view through the camera but it was still so fleeting!

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.