He claims to have won the last e******n, so isn't he disqualified as a candidate?
ArtzDarkroom wrote:
He claims to have won the last e******n, so isn't he disqualified as a candidate?
That's what the 2020 e******n deniers are having trouble justifying!
IF as they claim, t***p w*n the 2020 e******n, then trump would definitely NOT Constitutionally be allowed to run for office in 2024.
It's a conundrum for them.
They either need to admit that trump lied to his cult members about falsely claiming that he won the 2020 e******n, or they they shouldn't be supporting trump in 2024 because he's ineligible to run for a 3rd term.
I can't wait to see which choice they decide to go with, and their reasons for their choices!
ArtzDarkroom wrote:
He claims to have won the last e******n, so isn't he disqualified as a candidate?
For the same reason that Obama ran for a third term. The difference is that Obama won.
rcarol wrote:
For the same reason that Obama ran for a third term. The difference is that Obama won.
There was no stopping him once he got his birth all sorted out eh!
Did you ever see Obama tear strips from Trump's "Birther" hide? WH Correspondents' dinner? Up close and personal? It was masterful and elegant! My word! My oath! It was surgical!
rcarol wrote:
For the same reason that Obama ran for a third term. The difference is that Obama won.
That he did. And his errand boy is taking phone calls telling him what to do every day.
FrumCA wrote:
That he did. And his errand boy is taking phone calls telling him what to do every day. ...
As opposed to trump taking advised by or taking orders from Putin or other enemies of the United States?
I don't know about you, but I'd much rather see a POTUS be advised by a previous POTUS of either party who understands and follows the US Constitution and the rule of law, rather than by an adversary or enemy of the United States.
Shutterbug1697 wrote:
As opposed to trump taking advised by or taking orders from Putin or other enemies of the United States?
I don't know about you, but I'd much rather see a POTUS be advised by a previous POTUS of either party who understands and follows the US Constitution and the rule of law, rather than by an adversary or enemy of the United States.
And the Trump/Russian conspiracy theory continues …..
rcarol wrote:
And the Trump/Russian conspiracy theory continues …..
Gee, what a novel comeback.
Shutterbug1697 wrote:
As opposed to trump taking advised by or taking orders from Putin or other enemies of the United States?
I don't know about you, but I'd much rather see a POTUS be advised by a previous POTUS of either party who understands and follows the US Constitution and the rule of law, rather than by an adversary or enemy of the United States.
You should consider putting the Trump/Russian conspiracy to bed. This was debunked years ago.
FrumCA wrote:
You should consider putting the Trump/Russian conspiracy to bed. This was debunked years ago.
Lol, make her a deal and work out a viable trade.
ArtzDarkroom wrote:
He claims to have won the last e******n, so isn't he disqualified as a candidate?
Because Obama is in his third term.
T***h Seeker wrote:
Because Obama is in his third term.
Sleeping late again, huh!
DaveO wrote:
Sleeping late again, huh!
He's a ... 'red nosed Idaho m*****a camo boob'. Not endangered
Clarify for me please: Does the Constitution for bid "running/winning" for a third term or. "serving" for a third term?
Makes a difference as to whether he can qualify for a next term.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.