AI Crucifixion
Mar 24, 2024 13:19:46 #
Before you tell me that this should be in the "AI Artistry & Creation" section, I did initially post this only to that AI section. The owner of the AI section sent me a PM stating "Your topic AI Crucifixion was deleted. Please do not post christian imagery in this section." REALLY??? I checked the "Please read" post in the AI section, and it showed nothing about religious imagery. I wonder if the owner of that section is anti-Christian?
So, re-posting it here...we regularly see pictures here of churches and other religious topics. The images shown were created using Bing Creator AI using the text: "Crucifixion on Calvary, with 2 additional crosses for thieves, sky background, saying INRI on top of Jesus' cross, with Mary, Martha, St. John, Roman Soldiers." There were several images created, and here are the best of the lot. Note that in the last 2 shown, it put the INRI (which translated is: Jesus of Nazareth King of the Jews) onto to thieves crosses, so I blurred those out in post.
So, re-posting it here...we regularly see pictures here of churches and other religious topics. The images shown were created using Bing Creator AI using the text: "Crucifixion on Calvary, with 2 additional crosses for thieves, sky background, saying INRI on top of Jesus' cross, with Mary, Martha, St. John, Roman Soldiers." There were several images created, and here are the best of the lot. Note that in the last 2 shown, it put the INRI (which translated is: Jesus of Nazareth King of the Jews) onto to thieves crosses, so I blurred those out in post.
Mar 24, 2024 13:35:46 #
Mar 24, 2024 13:44:10 #
Neat.
I've noticed that in the majority of the AI creations that the colors are very bold and brilliant, as well as the lighting.
I've noticed that in the majority of the AI creations that the colors are very bold and brilliant, as well as the lighting.
Mar 24, 2024 14:54:08 #
There is a group for Christian photography that does not specifically ban AI images. You might try posting there. It would avoid needless argument. https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/s-111-1.html
Mar 24, 2024 16:14:09 #
terryMc wrote:
There is a group for Christian photography that does not specifically ban AI images. You might try posting there. It would avoid needless argument. https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/s-111-1.html
That wasn't his point........
It was an AI image.
Section rules don't specify "no religious images", Christian OR otherwise.
Mar 24, 2024 16:41:12 #
Longshadow wrote:
That wasn't his point........
It was an AI image.
Section rules don't specify "no religious images", Christian OR otherwise.
It was an AI image.
Section rules don't specify "no religious images", Christian OR otherwise.
I know, but we've been through this before. Rongnongno made it pretty clear, but apparently never spelled it out in the rules. He should.
Mar 24, 2024 17:27:26 #
terryMc wrote:
I know, but we've been through this before. Rongnongno made it pretty clear, but apparently never spelled it out in the rules. He should.
How elets would people know?
Mar 24, 2024 17:40:34 #
Mar 24, 2024 17:46:26 #
EJMcD wrote:
but who's work is it?
"...under current US law, there is no ownership of AI generated works..."
Currently, I believe, only art created by a human can be copyrighted.
Gonna be interesting, eh?
Mar 24, 2024 17:50:16 #
Longshadow wrote:
"...under current US law, there is no ownership of AI generated works..."
Currently, I believe, only art created by a human can be copyrighted.
Gonna be interesting, eh?
Currently, I believe, only art created by a human can be copyrighted.
Gonna be interesting, eh?
Exactly MY point! Thanks for your support.
Mar 25, 2024 00:52:50 #
I don't care how the images were created they are both beautiful and appropriate
Mar 25, 2024 07:53:17 #
Curmudgeon wrote:
I don't care how the images were created they are both beautiful and appropriate
I'll agree with that and so far, it doesn't appear anyone has said otherwise.
Mar 25, 2024 10:39:58 #
bobbyjohn wrote:
Before you tell me that this should be in the &quo... (show quote)
I'm not a fan of AI images as substitution for actual photographs. That having been typed, I can accept AI as a substitution for a painting of a historical event for which no photographs would be available. In this case, I find the images very well composed, relatively appropriate and very impressive. Also, as a Christian I appreciate the message conveyed by the images. Thank you for insuring they are available for review and comment.
Mar 25, 2024 11:57:18 #
Mar 25, 2024 14:25:44 #
This is the OP. Rather strange that I posted a Nativity Scene to the "AI Artistry & Creation" section about 7 weeks ago, and the owner of that AI section had no problem with that one...but he does have a problem with a Crucifixion scene.
See: https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-799059-1.html
See: https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-799059-1.html
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.