Playing with Generative Fill
Mar 24, 2024 13:15:51 #
Mar 24, 2024 13:29:42 #
Mar 24, 2024 13:30:33 #
Mar 24, 2024 13:36:56 #
Mar 24, 2024 13:40:35 #
Mar 24, 2024 14:06:10 #
Curmudgeon wrote:
Yep
The proportions were ok. The 'look' was not. It seemed out of place, too 'slick' for lack of words.
Mar 24, 2024 15:02:04 #
Rongnongno wrote:
The proportions were ok. The 'look' was not. It seemed out of place, too 'slick' for lack of words.
I hadn't tried Generative Fill that way. Probably won't again unless it improves
Mar 24, 2024 18:26:22 #
Mar 24, 2024 19:03:03 #
Mar 25, 2024 06:51:13 #
Curmudgeon wrote:
I hadn't tried Generative Fill that way. Probably won't again unless it improves
I used Generative Fill a lot and some things were good, but I was never satisfied with biological life. I still use it some, but bing does a lot better. Generative Fill has a long way to go to catch up. I like your image.
Mar 25, 2024 08:14:39 #
A year from now if you if you used the same description the otter would look even better.
Mar 25, 2024 13:00:00 #
Bill Hancock wrote:
I used Generative Fill a lot and some things were good, but I was never satisfied with biological life. I still use it some, but bing does a lot better. Generative Fill has a long way to go to catch up. I like your image.
Thanks for looking Bill. I think Generative Expand and Generative Fill are ready for prime time. IMHO the weakness is Firefly which has a long way to go to equal Bing or MidJourney
Mar 25, 2024 13:02:40 #
NJFrank wrote:
A year from now if you if you used the same description the otter would look even better.
Only if Adobe makes major advances in Firefly
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.