The big green lie exposed
Mar 22, 2024 05:49:47 #
Truth Seeker
Loc: High Mountains of the Western US
Proof that wind and solar are disasters, and the energy America really needs
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/proof-wind-solar-disasters-energy-america-really-needs
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/proof-wind-solar-disasters-energy-america-really-needs
Mar 22, 2024 06:05:22 #
You even wake up choking!
Someone offers an opinion and you call it proof. What a maroon.
Someone offers an opinion and you call it proof. What a maroon.
Mar 22, 2024 06:19:13 #
T***h Seeker wrote:
Proof that wind and solar are disasters, and the energy America really needs
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/proof-wind-solar-disasters-energy-america-really-needs
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/proof-wind-solar-disasters-energy-america-really-needs
Overall, we rate Fox News right biased based on editorial positions that align with the right and Questionable due to the promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, p***********e, the use of poor sources, and numerous false claims and failed fact checks. Straight news reporting from beat reporters is generally fact-based and accurate, which earns them a Mixed factual rating. (7/19/2016) Updated (M. Huitsing 04/26/2023)
Mar 22, 2024 07:26:16 #
Kraken wrote:
Overall, we rate Fox News right biased based on editorial positions that align with the right and Questionable due to the promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, p***********e, the use of poor sources, and numerous false claims and failed fact checks. Straight news reporting from beat reporters is generally fact-based and accurate, which earns them a Mixed factual rating. (7/19/2016) Updated (M. Huitsing 04/26/2023)
Lie-Speaker needs all the bias he can get to defend and bow to his cult leader.
Mar 22, 2024 07:27:19 #
From seekingalpha.com
The issue that should concern everyone is not the Joe Biden administration and their ideology around c*****e c****e, or the EPA, or even the viability of EVs themselves. The issue that should draw the biggest concern is how the regulation originates; what is the impetus; who are the beneficiaries?
The regulation itself did not originate in the EPA, nor was it created from an origination process amid climate ideologues in the administration. Everything starts with BlackRock positioning their assets. From that empirical point, all political activity then takes place, which includes the regulations to support the BlackRock objective.
A massive, multinational investment firm is in control of political outcomes in the USA. That should be the emphasis, not necessarily the regulation that flows as an outcome of that control, and certainly not the debate over whether EVs are a viable alternative to combustion engines.
BlackRock, and the control agents of finance, banking and investment, would like nothing more than to see Congress have debates about c*****e c****e, the viability of EVs as an alternative to combustion engines, the nuances of power grid generation from alternative energy sources, the scale of energy need as estimated and debated for the next two decades, etc.
All these points of debate become useful political policy issues that divide and contrast. Sure, Congress would love to hold hearings about EV viability, U.S. grid compliance, the need for subsidized charging stations, etcetera, etcetera. Because what is not discussed in this debate is where the subject matter comes from.
BlackRock positions their money to benefit from policy. BlackRock, like others, then manipulate the policymakers to support their position. We The People end up in a debate over EVs, while the BlackRock executives dance merrily into cocktail hour, discuss the latest climb in their value, and debate which politician should get a cut of the proceeds.
Nowhere in the political process on Capitol Hill does anyone ask, “How did the BlackRock investment group know to support Chinese EV plants in Mexico?”
The obvious fire of corporatism/f*****m is ignored while the politicians, and us, debate the ramifications of the smoke, EVs.
Democrats would love to debate EVs and say the Republicans are planet k**lers. Republicans would love to debate EVs and say the Democrats are taking away your freedom.
Meanwhile, corporations are running the U.S. government…. and people are oblivious.
The elected political representatives are dancing tools, useful for the purposes of distracting the American people, and funded by the corporations who need them to continue the distractions.
In a very similar fashion to how laws are written by K-Street corporations and sold by lobbyists, so too are regulations originated by outside groups and then pushed into the administration. The politicians and/or bureaucrats in the administration then benefit financially from implementing the regulation.
The issue with Joe Biden’s EPA mandate for EV use is not an issue over which form of energy development is more useful for the passenger t***sportation needs of American consumers. The issue with Joe Biden’s EPA mandate is that BlackRock originated it.
Once you elevate to the level of root cause, then you start to ask, “What else is BlackRock originating?”
"2022 – NEW YORK, March 24 (Reuters) – BlackRock Inc’s (BLK.N) chief executive, Larry Fink, said on Thursday that the Russia-Ukraine war could end up accelerating digital currencies as a tool to settle international t***sactions, as the conflict upends the globalization drive of the last three decades.
In a letter to the shareholders of the world’s largest asset manager, Fink said the war will push countries to reassess currency dependencies, and that BlackRock was studying digital currencies and stablecoins due to increased client interest.
“A global digital payment system, thoughtfully designed, can enhance the settlement of international t***sactions while reducing the risk of money laundering and corruption”, he said".
Russia enters Ukraine Feb 14, 2022. Less than 4 weeks later, BlackRock CEO Larry Fink is outlining a dollar-based central bank digital trade currency.
Huh. Imagine that.
Everything else is chaff and countermeasures.
The issue that should concern everyone is not the Joe Biden administration and their ideology around c*****e c****e, or the EPA, or even the viability of EVs themselves. The issue that should draw the biggest concern is how the regulation originates; what is the impetus; who are the beneficiaries?
The regulation itself did not originate in the EPA, nor was it created from an origination process amid climate ideologues in the administration. Everything starts with BlackRock positioning their assets. From that empirical point, all political activity then takes place, which includes the regulations to support the BlackRock objective.
A massive, multinational investment firm is in control of political outcomes in the USA. That should be the emphasis, not necessarily the regulation that flows as an outcome of that control, and certainly not the debate over whether EVs are a viable alternative to combustion engines.
BlackRock, and the control agents of finance, banking and investment, would like nothing more than to see Congress have debates about c*****e c****e, the viability of EVs as an alternative to combustion engines, the nuances of power grid generation from alternative energy sources, the scale of energy need as estimated and debated for the next two decades, etc.
All these points of debate become useful political policy issues that divide and contrast. Sure, Congress would love to hold hearings about EV viability, U.S. grid compliance, the need for subsidized charging stations, etcetera, etcetera. Because what is not discussed in this debate is where the subject matter comes from.
BlackRock positions their money to benefit from policy. BlackRock, like others, then manipulate the policymakers to support their position. We The People end up in a debate over EVs, while the BlackRock executives dance merrily into cocktail hour, discuss the latest climb in their value, and debate which politician should get a cut of the proceeds.
Nowhere in the political process on Capitol Hill does anyone ask, “How did the BlackRock investment group know to support Chinese EV plants in Mexico?”
The obvious fire of corporatism/f*****m is ignored while the politicians, and us, debate the ramifications of the smoke, EVs.
Democrats would love to debate EVs and say the Republicans are planet k**lers. Republicans would love to debate EVs and say the Democrats are taking away your freedom.
Meanwhile, corporations are running the U.S. government…. and people are oblivious.
The elected political representatives are dancing tools, useful for the purposes of distracting the American people, and funded by the corporations who need them to continue the distractions.
In a very similar fashion to how laws are written by K-Street corporations and sold by lobbyists, so too are regulations originated by outside groups and then pushed into the administration. The politicians and/or bureaucrats in the administration then benefit financially from implementing the regulation.
The issue with Joe Biden’s EPA mandate for EV use is not an issue over which form of energy development is more useful for the passenger t***sportation needs of American consumers. The issue with Joe Biden’s EPA mandate is that BlackRock originated it.
Once you elevate to the level of root cause, then you start to ask, “What else is BlackRock originating?”
"2022 – NEW YORK, March 24 (Reuters) – BlackRock Inc’s (BLK.N) chief executive, Larry Fink, said on Thursday that the Russia-Ukraine war could end up accelerating digital currencies as a tool to settle international t***sactions, as the conflict upends the globalization drive of the last three decades.
In a letter to the shareholders of the world’s largest asset manager, Fink said the war will push countries to reassess currency dependencies, and that BlackRock was studying digital currencies and stablecoins due to increased client interest.
“A global digital payment system, thoughtfully designed, can enhance the settlement of international t***sactions while reducing the risk of money laundering and corruption”, he said".
Russia enters Ukraine Feb 14, 2022. Less than 4 weeks later, BlackRock CEO Larry Fink is outlining a dollar-based central bank digital trade currency.
Huh. Imagine that.
Everything else is chaff and countermeasures.
Mar 22, 2024 07:51:49 #
Truth Seeker
Loc: High Mountains of the Western US
DaveO wrote:
You even wake up choking!
Someone offers an opinion and you call it proof. What a maroon.
Someone offers an opinion and you call it proof. What a maroon.
We all know what you are choking on and so does Obiden.
Mar 22, 2024 07:55:21 #
Truth Seeker
Loc: High Mountains of the Western US
DaveO wrote:
You even wake up choking!
Someone offers an opinion and you call it proof. What a maroon.
Someone offers an opinion and you call it proof. What a maroon.
Maybe you should try reading for a change
“Unfortunately, the debate over energy is dominated by agenda-driven outbursts and misleading statistics, from activists and governmental officials alike. That’s why we released a comprehensive report card that reviews every major energy source's benefits (and limitations). “
It’s a report not an opinion
Mar 22, 2024 07:55:43 #
T***h Seeker wrote:
We all know what you are choking on and so does Obiden.
Awww, aren't you just special, gargle-boy!
Don't you ever tire of humping Big Perp's leg and reaching into your playground rhetoric? Will you make it into the sixth grade this year and leave your buddies behind?
Mar 22, 2024 07:58:14 #
Truth Seeker
Loc: High Mountains of the Western US
dakotacheryl wrote:
From seekingalpha.com br br The issue that should... (show quote)
Black Rock and their useful i***ts have put us in a dark place
Mar 22, 2024 07:59:47 #
Truth Seeker
Loc: High Mountains of the Western US
DaveO wrote:
Awww, aren't you just special, gargle-boy!
Don't you ever tire of humping Big Perp's leg and reaching into your playground rhetoric? Will you make it into the sixth grade this year and leave your buddies behind?
Don't you ever tire of humping Big Perp's leg and reaching into your playground rhetoric? Will you make it into the sixth grade this year and leave your buddies behind?
I must be over the target. You’re juvenile slip is showing.
Mar 22, 2024 08:01:19 #
T***h Seeker wrote:
Maybe you should try reading for a change
“Unfortunately, the debate over energy is dominated by agenda-driven outbursts and misleading statistics, from activists and governmental officials alike. That’s why we released a comprehensive report card that reviews every major energy source's benefits (and limitations). “
It’s a report not an opinion
“Unfortunately, the debate over energy is dominated by agenda-driven outbursts and misleading statistics, from activists and governmental officials alike. That’s why we released a comprehensive report card that reviews every major energy source's benefits (and limitations). “
It’s a report not an opinion
The very title states it is an opinion and lists the contributors, so it must be quite confusing for you. The Hooked On Phonics course won't help you.
From your link: "CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION."
BTW, did you save up enough change to buy a camera yet? Did you figure out that you joined a photography forum and the Attic is not the only section?
What a maroon!Mar 22, 2024 08:02:20 #
T***h Seeker wrote:
I must be over the target. You’re juvenile slip is showing.
Yeah, your target is trump's leg.
Mar 22, 2024 09:06:27 #
T***h Seeker wrote:
Maybe you should try reading for a change
“Unfortunately, the debate over energy is dominated by agenda-driven outbursts and misleading statistics, from activists and governmental officials alike. That’s why we released a comprehensive report card that reviews every major energy source's benefits (and limitations). “
It’s a report not an opinion
“Unfortunately, the debate over energy is dominated by agenda-driven outbursts and misleading statistics, from activists and governmental officials alike. That’s why we released a comprehensive report card that reviews every major energy source's benefits (and limitations). “
It’s a report not an opinion
It is a "report" based on opinion, not facts.
Mar 22, 2024 09:11:23 #
National Park wrote:
It is a "report" based on opinion, not facts.
Who would expect fact to come from fiction other than the Right! Opinion is all that they have to fuel their conspiracy theories, which they try to peddle as fact to the lower educated rural v**ers.
Mar 22, 2024 09:13:58 #
McKinneyMike wrote:
Who would expect fact to come from fiction other than the Right! Opinion is all that they have to fuel their conspiracy theories, which they try to peddle as fact to the lower educated rural v**ers.
Alternate facts are not facts. They are lies.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.